Originally posted by Baziemarc123
Where do we see Superman stopping Starbreaker from moving Earth?and are you trying to pass it off as some kind of striking feat?
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
Oh wait, that Hal harness feat is supposed to be relevant to Starbreaker. yeah I remember, Hal had to assist Superman with the feat LOLit'd only be planetary away
pushing the wheels is unquantifiable as hell, i know this feat been discussed too much to even be posted. it's definiately not stellar mass thats for sure
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
The Mageddon feat have been debunked. Superman fans always post something you've seen for years and try to pass as it off acting as if it hadn't been debunked on countless forums smh
I didn't even open the link and I knew it would be idiotic.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Actually he has.He stopped moon from moving when it was being moved by a machine with a sun as power source, threw a growing solar system away and stopped Starbreaker from moving Earth when Starbreaker had absorbed several red suns and opposing Hal and Superman drained him completely.
LOL All the scans you showed are not proof Superman can move stellar mass. They are good feats, but you're misinterpreting them to an extreme extent. I'll explain
First, your scans from JLA 80 Page Giant #3
Superman stopping the deceleration of an out of orbit moon is nowhere near stellar mass
Yes, the alchemical engines that cause the moon to decelerate, are powered by a (small sun)
--> But the sun (energy source) has no correlation to the mass of the moon. It's just an energy source, that's it
My car battery (powers) my car. Does that mean my car has the same weight as the battery, since it's powering it? No
The energy source had no effect on the objects mass
--> The small suns energy that powers the alchemical engines, which decelerates the moon, has no effect on the moons mass
Let me explain what happened in that story
- Small sun powers the alchemical engines
- The Alchemical engines cause the moon to decelerate
- To prevent this from happening, kyle and Superman push/pull the moon, causing it (to) accelerate, in hopes of keeping it on its natural orbit speed
All Superman is doing, is embracing the mass of the moon and pushing it against whatever force the alchemical engines are enacting on it. That's nowhere near stellar mass (weight of our sun). Absolutely nowhere near
Now, even if you believe the alchemical engines power source (small sun) is in fact the mass that which moon now suddenly became for no reason, then it (still) wouldn't equate to stellar mass (weight of our sun)
Because Hugh, directly stated that the small sun that powered the alchemical engines had a mass of a few Jupiters, give or take. That's directly stated:
https://postimg.cc/image/bdwl1fvkr/188fac39/
Even though he said a (few) I'll highball it and say that small sun had the mass of 10 Jupiters
- One Jupiter equals 1.898e27 kg
Ten Jupiters would equal 1.898e28 kg
Stellar mass is 1.989e30 kg
That means the highballed hypothetical moon (10 Jupiter mass) is 104x lighter than the sun (stellar mass)
So even if you wanted to go with that inaccurate explanation, it still wouldn't equate to stellar mass
As far as your other scans, they're not proof of stellar mass
Stopping a 70 mile ship that would split the mantle of a planet is nowhere near stellar mass
Him "moving" the wheels in Mageddon is nowhere near stellar mass
Breaking out of the source wall is not a star level feat. It just shows if anything, that he's more powerful than the planet that got sucked in
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
LOL All the scans you showed are not proof Superman can move stellar mass. They are good feats, but you're misinterpreting them to an extreme extent. I'll explain
That should be fun.
First, your scans from JLA 80 Page Giant #3
Superman stopping the deceleration of an out of orbit moon is nowhere near stellar mass
Yes, the alchemical engines that cause the moon to decelerate, are powered by a (small sun)
--> But the sun (energy source) has no correlation to the mass of the moon. It's just an energy source, that's it
My car battery (powers) my car. Does that mean my car has the same weight as the battery, since it's powering it? No
The force required to stop the moon moving would be to stop the force used by stellar engine. And it was a sun's energy.
Small sun is still stellar punk.
The battery doesn't moves the car, it's engine does and try to stop a moving car, why don't you?
The energy source had no effect on the objects mass
--> The small suns energy that powers the alchemical engines, which decelerates the moon, has no effect on the moons mass
Let me explain what happened in that story
- Small sun powers the alchemical engines
- The Alchemical engines cause the moon to decelerate
- To prevent this from happening, kyle and Superman push/pull the moon, causing it (to) accelerate, in hopes of keeping it on its natural orbit speed
All Superman is doing, is embracing the mass of the moon and pushing it against whatever force the alchemical engines are enacting on it. That's nowhere near stellar mass (weight of our sun). Absolutely nowhere near
How about the force punk? The moon isn't moving out from the orbit on its own.
Now, even if you believe the alchemical engines power source (small sun) is in fact the mass that which moon now suddenly became for no reason, then it (still) wouldn't equate to stellar mass (weight of our sun)
Because Hugh, directly stated that the small sun that powered the alchemical engines had a mass of a few Jupiters, give or take. That's directly stated:
https://postimg.cc/image/bdwl1fvkr/188fac39/
Even though he said a (few) I'll highball it and say that small sun had the mass of 10 Jupiters
- One Jupiter equals 1.898e27 kg
Ten Jupiters would equal 1.898e28 kg
Stellar mass is 1.989e30 kg
That means the highballed hypothetical moon (10 Jupiter mass) is 104x lighter than the sun (stellar mass)
So even if you wanted to go with that inaccurate explanation, it still wouldn't equate to stellar mass
I'm talking about the force the sun engine is putting out punk.
Try to keep up.
As far as your other scans, they're not proof of stellar mass
Right, why don't you post the gibberish for them too.
Stopping a 70 mile ship that would split the mantle of a planet is nowhere near stellar mass
Him "moving" the wheels in Mageddon is nowhere near stellar mass
Breaking out of the source wall is not a star level feat. It just shows if anything, that he's more powerful than the planet that got sucked in
How about the Starbreaker feat?
Why would the starbreaker feat be above planetary when Superman just moved a planet assisted by Hal?
Post proof that it's somehow "stellar mass"
I'll address your other claims shortly. you've already conceded on that 70 mile planetary, the mageddon, and the source wall considering you didn't address it and switched to "WHAT ABOUT THE STARBREAKER FEAT"
You're so bad at this
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
You didn't prove a relevant point on the absorptionI calculated the joules, not the poison dosage, because antisunlight doesn't exist
Like I said, you've only skimmed and cherry picked words, lol. I brought up multiple points and you only addressed one.
Remember what you typed? You said:
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
LOL several? Hahaha I'd love to see this, and it was never confirmed he absorbed the hypernova. all he did was push the gears which is a known unquantifable feat
Now, did he 'just' push the gears? Was that 'all' he did? Or did he do other things as well?
Lol.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Good response.So did he not absorb anything?
He absorbed anti sunlight, that I agree with it, But it's not a durability feat like ive EXPLAINED too many times to you. right now we're going in circles
if you have anything relevant that I haven't ADDRESSED already, post it otherwise you're just repeating yourself
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
Why would the starbreaker feat be above planetary when Superman just moved a planet assisted by Hal?Post proof that it's somehow "stellar mass"
I'll address your other claims shortly. you've already conceded on that 70 mile planetary, the mageddon, and the source wall considering you didn't address it and switched to "WHAT ABOUT THE STARBREAKER FEAT"
You're so bad at this
Starbreaker had absorbed suns and the power was totally drained opposing Superman and Hal. The force is stellar level in the situation even if the mass is just planetary.
You're just fixated on stellar mass now.
Why don't you post stellar feats for Thor now?
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
He absorbed anti sunlight, that I agree with it, But it's not a durability feat like ive EXPLAINED too many times to you. right now we're going in circlesif you have anything relevant that I haven't ADDRESSED already, post it otherwise you're just repeating yourself