Who is more heroic: Captain America vs. Thor

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I know i said I would ignore you for the rest of this thread, but DAMN SHIT this deserves me breaking my word!!

[B] YOU CONCEDED! YOU ARE FROTHBYTE'S CHEERLEADER!

I was specifically referencing FrothByte's cheerleader, and YOU CLEARLY quoted it!!!

YOU LOST 😂

I knew you were stupid, but this is GOLD!!! 😂

Keep cheerleading you moron! [/B]

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yes, you brought up the discussion about self sacrifice. I disagreed with your stance. All within bounds of the discussion. Now you can't find a way to properly rebutt my statements and are trying to find a way to squirm out of the debate without losing face.

I brought the Self Sacrifice argument as a direct support of me claiming Cap being MORE HEROIC.

These is the subject being debated here. Again anything else, falls outside thread parameters!

So again, were you/are you supporting Thor as the more heroic here?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are childish and very stupid. You live in your own reality. You don’t win any debates you’re there to be mocked. You can’t even spell dumbass correctly you dumb fat slob.

So lets resume a bit.

You are a racist, gay, stupid, clown, troll, and now a cheerleader too!? OMG you are unique! 😂

josh once again proves he is unable to see any thread as anything other than a black and white choice. Very limited intellect. Sad.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I brought the Self Sacrifice argument as a direct support of me claiming Cap being MORE HEROIC.

These is the subject being debated here. Again anything else, [B] falls outside thread parameters!

So again, were you/are you supporting Thor as the more heroic here? [/B]

And I'm saying Thor is more self sacrificing than Cap. I will also say that Thor is capable of making harder decisions and is more honest.

Originally posted by FrothByte
And I'm saying Thor is more self sacrificing than Cap. I will also say that Thor is capable of making harder decisions and is more honest.

And yet you are not addressing the motion being debated here.

Therefore mr Froth you are falling out of context.

Clearly the Tribunal has no concern here then.

Originally posted by quanchi112
josh once again proves he is unable to see any thread as anything other than a black and white choice. Very limited intellect. Sad.

Once again you fail to quote me aka you fear me 😂

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Once again you fail to quote me aka you fear me 😂

Originally posted by Silent Master
It goes to your credibility as a debator, thus it's very relevant.

So, back up your claim or admit you were lying.

Credibility has nothing to do with debating. Here, everything can be verified. No need to trust anyone on their word. Just verify what someone says. It's simple.

So you admit due to your past you don’t have any more credibility. Very telling.

Originally posted by h1a8
Credibility has nothing to do with debating. Here, everything can be verified. No need to trust anyone on their word. Just verify what someone says. It's simple.

Credibility has everything to do with debating, that you would try and argue otherwise is just further proof that people should never believe anything you've ever said.

Now, back up your claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Credibility has everything to do with debating, that you would try and argue otherwise is just further proof that people should never believe anything you've ever said.

Now, back up your claim.

If you believe this then you are an idiot. You should never believe anyone in a debate unless you verify what they are saying is true.

It's all about verifying what someone says. Taking their word without investigation means you are an idiot.

Originally posted by h1a8
If you believe this then you are an idiot. You should never believe anyone in a debate unless you verify what they are saying is true.

It's all about verifying what someone says. Taking their word without investigation means you are an idiot.

If you insist.

You h1 are a liar and everyone will continue to call you a liar until you back up your claim.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
And yet you are not addressing the motion being debated here.

Therefore mr Froth you are falling out of context.

Clearly the Tribunal has no concern here then.

I gave you my stance and my disagreements on yours. If you want to run away from this debate then go for it. Because we both know that all of your "not addressing the motion" is you trying to get out of the debate.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I gave you my stance and my disagreements on yours. If you want to run away from this debate then go for it. Because we both know that all of your "not addressing the motion" is you trying to get out of the debate.

Repeating yourself wont help.

You arent debating since you wont take a side in the motion presented here!

Stop playing fool.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Repeating yourself wont help.

You arent debating since you wont take a side in the motion presented here!

Stop playing fool.

Thor is more self- sacrificing than Cap. If you can't prove me wrong then it means you concede.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor is more self- sacrificing than Cap. If you can't prove me wrong then it means you concede.

1. You keep dodging and whimping
2. You are not debating
3. I already post my argument to which you failed to counter.
4. You ran from the debate

Conclusion: You lost.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor is more self- sacrificing than Cap. If you can't prove me wrong then it means you concede.

Don't see how one can be seen as being more self-sacrificing than the other when both have shown a willingness to give up their lives for the greater good on more than one occasion. IMO, you can't really go much further than that.

Also, lol at H1 talking about credibility and verifying things, when he has a long history of using personal claims and anecdotes in arguments, and then refusing to verify them with evidence when called out.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Don't see how one can be seen as being more self-sacrificing than the other when both have shown a willingness to give up their lives for the greater good on more than one occasion. IMO, you can't really go much further than that.

Also, lol at H1 talking about credibility and verifying things, when he has a long history of using personal claims and anecdotes in arguments, and then refusing to verify them with evidence when called out.

Someone who has more to lose sacrifices more than someone with less to lose.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Someone who has more to lose sacrifices more than someone with less to lose.

Why does Thor have more to lose? Steve has plenty of friends, loved ones etc. as well as an entire planet he calls home and feels at least partly responsible for.

Not to mention external circumstances don't necessarily reflect level of heroics. Is a homeless guy jumping on a grenade less heroic than a billionaire jumping on a grenade?