Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
That is just BS. That's your way of avoiding picking a side!They are not equals and both are quite different.
Pick a side, or just admit you don't know whose better.
I made the thread specifically because it was a close match in my head.
Captain America is a better leader, more inspirational, more sincere, is more used to being the underdog and has a stricter moral compass.
Thor has gone through more personal development, conquered more hardships, is more honest, has made harder choices, and his actions have saved more lives.
Originally posted by FrothByte
I made the thread specifically because it was a close match in my head.Captain America is a better leader, more inspirational, more sincere, is more used to being the underdog and has a stricter moral compass.
Thor has gone through more personal development, conquered more hardships, is more honest, has made harder choices, and his actions have saved more lives.
Pick a side or stay ond the sidelines mr. Froth. You can't pretend to support both sides, it's like trying to vote for two presidents.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Why does my opinion matter so much to you Josh? Or are you being argumentative just for the sake of being argumentative?
Because you've been lowballing my arguments and attacking my points. You've been pretending to debate me and in the end you come with the pathetic excuse of, " I never picked a side".
If you are gonna debate or attack someone you've got to have an opposite belief or argument, not a neutral one!
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Because you've been lowballing my arguments and attacking my points. You've been pretending to debate me and in the end you come with the pathetic excuse of, " I never picked a side".If you are gonna debate or attack someone you've got to have an opposite belief or argument, not a neutral one!
No, I've been pointing out how your arguments were false and blatantly exaggerated. It's not lowballing when you simply point out the truth.
I never disagreed with your choice of Cap, I disagreed with your misrepresentation of feats and your claim that Cap went through more adversity than Thor.
Originally posted by Josh_AlexanderIn a thread like this, you can support both IMO. Both are heroes, honestly both are similar in terms of morals and values.
Pick a side or stay ond the sidelines mr. Froth. You can't pretend to support both sides, it's like trying to vote for two presidents.
I personally give Cap the win, although it's pretty close.
Thor is more the adventurer archetype IMO. He loves what he does and does it because it's his responsibility, sure, but also because it's another adventure to have and another story to make.
Cap fits more snuggly into the hero archetype. He does what he does for no reason other than it's right. He doesn't actually enjoy it. He didn't enjoy siding against Tony in the entire Accords ordeal or fighting his prior teammates, but he did it but he did it to avoid the deterioration of the status quo. He realized that the Accords going through would lead to loss of autonomy which would inevitably lead to the unnecessary the loss of life.
When Thor has a new enemy to fight, he relishes the impending struggle. He sees it all as another development in his own personal story. When Cap has a new enemy to fight, he only sees the potential threat to the civilians and world around him. There's nothing glamorous about the impending destruction. He just wants to put a stop to it ASAP. Cap has more purely altruistic motivations and character.
That's my opinion on this thread. I do prefer Thor as a character though, and always have.
Originally posted by FrothByte
No, I've been pointing out how your arguments were false and blatantly exaggerated. It's not lowballing when you simply point out the truth.I never disagreed with your choice of Cap, I disagreed with your misrepresentation of feats and your claim that Cap went through more adversity than Thor.
You can disagree as much as you want Mr. Froth. Reality keeps intact, unless that is, you have the Reality Stone. 😂
Either way, nice knowing you are neutral. Keep that way.
Originally posted by Arachnid1
In a thread like this, you can support both IMO. Both are heroes, honestly both are similar in terms of morals and values.I personally give Cap the win, although it's pretty close.
Thor is more the adventurer archetype IMO. He loves what he does and does it because it's his responsibility, sure, but also because it's another adventure to have and another story to make.
Cap fits more snuggly into the hero archetype. He does what he does for no reason other than it's right. He doesn't actually enjoy it. He didn't enjoy siding against Tony in the entire Accords ordeal or fighting his prior teammates, but he did it but he did it to avoid the deterioration of the status quo. He realized that the Accords going through would lead to loss of autonomy which would inevitably lead to the unnecessary the loss of life.
When Thor has a new enemy to fight, he relishes the impending struggle. He sees it all as another development in his own personal story. When Cap has a new enemy to fight, he only sees the potential threat to the civilians and world around him. There's nothing glamorous about the impending destruction. He just wants to put a stop to it ASAP. Cap has more purely altruistic motivations and character.
That's my opinion on this thread. I do prefer Thor as a character though, and always have.
Good points. Something more to consider.
Originally posted by Arachnid1
In a thread like this, you can support both IMO. Both are heroes, honestly both are similar in terms of morals and values.I personally give Cap the win, although it's pretty close.
Thor is more the adventurer archetype IMO. He loves what he does and does it because it's his responsibility, sure, but also because it's another adventure to have and another story to make.
Cap fits more snuggly into the hero archetype. He does what he does for no reason other than it's right. He doesn't actually enjoy it. He didn't enjoy siding against Tony in the entire Accords ordeal or fighting his prior teammates, but he did it but he did it to avoid the deterioration of the status quo. He realized that the Accords going through would lead to loss of autonomy which would inevitably lead to the unnecessary the loss of life.
When Thor has a new enemy to fight, he relishes the impending struggle. He sees it all as another development in his own personal story. When Cap has a new enemy to fight, he only sees the potential threat to the civilians and world around him. There's nothing glamorous about the impending destruction. He just wants to put a stop to it ASAP. Cap has more purely altruistic motivations and character.
That's my opinion on this thread. I do prefer Thor as a character though, and always have.
I retract what i said. Was just a bit pissed off.
You have the right to chose whosoever you please.