Who would be a bigger threat: Thor vs. Superman

Originally posted by h1a8
The fact that you and everyone else thought the star was much smaller is proof I wasn't trolling. Bran was wrong, stating that the scaling wasn't wrong and I was.
But the scaling is wrong, if the star is 20km in diameter. So Bran is wrong.

Anyway, in fiction stars can be any size the writer wants it to be (even marble size).

If we can't rely on visuals then we can't calculate from them either. That means Thor's velocity can't be calculated. Therefore the pushing force on Thor is unknown.

Who thought the star was much smaller? No one questioned my number since my number WAS a question, genius. Unlike certain trolls out there, I didn't declare it as fact and acknowledged that it was likely wrong (so no one had to accept/contradict it).

FYI, ppl thinking it's not much smaller is not proof of you not being a troll. What kind of stupid non sequitur reasoning is that?! 😆

You said 100 feet (not to mention 300 million tonz pressah), w/c means you were trolling as no one is that stupid (well, no one that can access the internet and use a keyboard anyway).

And even then (if we scale off visuals), 100 feet diameter is a stupidly absurd trolling lowball number that everyone should ignore (or better yet, laugh at). And you should feel bad for even posting it.

Unless a CLEAR storytelling tool is used to contradict real world facts, we assume something to have real world qualities. Otherwise, it can be pointed out that it is simply your own opinion/interpretation.

Don't be stupid. Of course we can calculate. If a Neutron Star is at a minimum of 20kms, we can easily scale the rest of the environment based on that. Stop trying to play the "make the "feat" ambiguous so we can't use it" tactic. Doesn't have to be precise, but we can establish reasonable minimums. This is why people don't take you seriously, you never argue in good faith, always with the sh!tty tactics that we can easily see through.

Originally posted by h1a8
Star was probably around less than 100 feet in diameter.

Proof that h1 is a troll

Originally posted by Silent Master
Proof that h1 is a troll

We should all do this until he goes away

Agreed. For me, it'll just be this:

In this thread h1 has gone from claiming a bullet has a pressure of 300 million tons, to a neutron star being 100 feet to lying about what I said. So yeap. Proof that h1 is a troll.

^Imma just continuously repost the above via cut/paste quote. Wasted enough time on that troll.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Who thought the star was much smaller? No one questioned my number since my number WAS a question, genius. Unlike certain trolls out there, I didn't declare it as fact and acknowledged that it was likely wrong (so no one had to accept/contradict it).

FYI, ppl thinking it's not much smaller is not proof of you not being a troll. What kind of stupid non sequitur reasoning is that?! 😆

You said 100 feet (not to mention 300 million tonz pressah), w/c means you were trolling as no one is that stupid (well, no one that can access the internet and use a keyboard anyway).

And even then (if we scale off visuals), 100 feet diameter is a stupidly absurd trolling lowball number that everyone should ignore (or better yet, laugh at). And you should feel bad for even posting it.

Unless a CLEAR storytelling tool is used to contradict real world facts, we assume something to have real world qualities. Otherwise, it can be pointed out that it is simply your own opinion/interpretation.

Don't be stupid. Of course we can calculate. If a Neutron Star is at a minimum of 20kms, we can easily scale the rest of the environment based on that. Stop trying to play the "make the "feat" ambiguous so we can't use it" tactic. Doesn't have to be precise, but we can establish reasonable minimums. This is why people don't take you seriously, you never argue in good faith, always with the sh!tty tactics that we can easily see through.

I explained why I thought it was 100ft. I misinterpreted the whole scene. I apologized. That's not trolling. If I was trolling then I would never admit to being wrong. I would just keep trolling. Like Quan does.

Anyway, in fiction, stars can be any size. Who's to say the writer's intent wasn't the size shown?
If the star is supposedly 20km then we can't calculate shit because the physics will also be off. For example, if the writer had the scene drawn to proper scale then Thor might have reached the ring at a longer time.

Also remember the leviathan scene? We got two completely different results by using the distance vs using the time elapsed. The speed and distance you used force time to be under a second. But we clearly see that it took longer than a second.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Agreed. For me, it'll just be this:

In this thread h1 has gone from claiming a bullet has a pressure of 300 million tons, to a neutron star being 100 feet to lying about what I said. So yeap. Proof that h1 is a troll.

^Imma just continuously repost the above via cut/paste quote. Wasted enough time on that troll.

Per square in. It was an error. Not trolling.
100 ft star was because of misinterpreting the scene. Not trolling.
I didn't lie about what you said. I didn't remember that you said thickness but you still assumed the wrong size anyway (which was my point). Here's the kicker, EVERYONE agreed with your findings.
Again not trolling.

Originally posted by h1a8
Peak Pressure = Peak Force /Area of tip
> 221 tons/ (pi x (0.001m)^2]
= [b]313 million tons per square inch

So give me feats where Thor was shown to withstand pressures on his body above 313 millions tons per square inch. [/B]

Originally posted by h1a8
Star was probably around less than 100 feet in diameter.

Proof that h1 is a troll

Originally posted by Silent Master
Proof that h1 is a troll

What's funny is that your post is immediately after mine. Once reading mine and then yours, anyone can see that you are the troll actually.

Originally posted by h1a8
Peak Pressure = Peak Force /Area of tip
> 221 tons/ (pi x (0.001m)^2]
= [b]313 million tons per square inch

So give me feats where Thor was shown to withstand pressures on his body above 313 millions tons per square inch. [/B]

Originally posted by h1a8
Star was probably around less than 100 feet in diameter.

Proof that h1 is a troll

Originally posted by h1a8
I explained why I thought it was 100ft. I misinterpreted the whole scene. I apologized. That's not trolling. If I was trolling then I would never admit to being wrong. I would just keep trolling. Like Quan does.

Anyway, in fiction, stars can be any size. Who's to say the writer's intent wasn't the size shown?
If the star is supposedly 20km then we can't calculate shit because the physics will also be off. For example, if the writer had the scene drawn to proper scale then Thor might have reached the ring at a longer time.

Also remember the leviathan scene? We got two completely different results by using the distance vs using the time elapsed. The speed and distance you used force time to be under a second. But we clearly see that it took longer than a second.

Originally posted by h1a8
Per square in. It was an error. Not trolling.
100 ft star was because of misinterpreting the scene. Not trolling.
I didn't lie about what you said. I didn't remember that you said thickness but you still assumed the wrong size anyway (which was my point).
Again not trolling.

The writer's intent was a neutron star. Plain and simple. I don't have to prove it to a troll like you because we know you'd never accept it.

You mean the leviathan scene debate we had where I challenged you to a BZ repeatedly to prove whose math was closer (seeing as I knew where you went wrong, just didn't want to tell you outside of a wagered BZ because you'd likely gloss over it and move on to another time-wasting tangent as usual) and you kept refusing?

Yeah we got different results but only one of us was willing to back his shit up.

Trying to lie about what really happened on that debate won't change things.

Lied about what I said. Now misrepresenting past debates to make it look like that wasn't another one of your "math" BS.

This is why no one should trust anything you say. Well, in truth, no one really does.

With that, I'm done with you. Expect nothing else but this reply past this point:

Originally posted by Nibedicus
In this thread h1 has gone from claiming a bullet has a pressure of 300 million tons, to a neutron star being 100 feet to lying about what I said (edit. and tried to misrepresent what happened in past debates). So yeap. Proof that h1 is a troll.

If the star is 100 feet I wonder what size H1 thinks Thor is.

So......we don't use direct comparisons, writers intent, logic, or common sense when coming to conclusions. We go simply off of lies and mathmagical equations.

^ Hulk: “I told you have Baby arms!”

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
So......we don't use direct comparisons, writers intent, logic, or common sense when coming to conclusions. We go simply off of lies and mathmagical equations.

No h1a8 is all about writers intent.

Only those intentions are whatever h1 likes them to be.

Mathmagical...oddly fits. Lol

Originally posted by Surtur
Mathmagical...oddly fits. Lol

I stole that from somebody else on this site but when dealing with 100ft stars that that carry single protons and super rounds that pack billions of tons of force I imagine wizardry plus faulty math is needed to come to these conclusions.

I once saw someone say h1 is a math teacher. I hope that was trolling.

^ I heard science teacher.

Not sure which would be worse.

The cool thing about lying is you can be whatever the **** u wanna be. Cowboy astronaut, porn ninja etc..

^ So why would you pick teacher Jeez. Use some imagination.