silly philly mental breakdown continues
Breathe, chromy. Breathe.
I actually agree with the Breathe part, b/c I have been laughing so hard at you.
I repeat: I am more then happy to BZ all of my position.
The fact that you want to BZ a part and not the entire thing shows your lack of understanding because it all fits together. For instance I have showed the proper context and important parts of all four battles between Lester and Frank. So in the BZ all four battles will be discussed.
So once you agree to it, we can begin.
Your quote specifically refers to the 3 fights we talked about, as it's those performances specifically you called inconsistent.
I don't care about anything else you might add, that we haven't discussed.
Do you stand on those two quotes that you yourself said, or not?
I asked you multiple questions there, try to focus, and answer them all. I repeat, for the third time:
Is Monday-Wednesday ok with you?
Two posts should be enough for such a small topic?
Judges? Galan, Pr, Leo? The first two are disinterested in street, and Leo is top notch.
Originally posted by Supermutant
so crazy BE performed way better with a toothpick and knife than in an armored exoskeleton with basically a cannon for a gun.Taskmaster has him beat there though, he's near the top for most inconsistent. He has two-shotted the Cat, one-shotted Karnak, humiliated Agent Venom, stalemated briefly Cap and Cap Bucky, owning both Pun and Deadpool. On the other hand he has been two-shotted by Elektra, one-shotted by Black Panther, humiliated by Mr. X, lost bad to Deadpool b/c he couldn't copy his unpredictable moves.
Nope I'd still say that Puniisher is more inconsistent because he loses to canon fodder. Ever see TM get beaten by 3 or 5 guys? Or have have trouble with two?
Seriously though what makes this debate so stupid is that lots of characters study each other, that could pretty much end it. As it's been pointed out I don't remember Phil going into a Bane or Taskmaster thread saying that these characters study their opponents. Oh yeah Punisher pretty much stated that he studies anybody he might meet in combat.
EDIT: I don't trust leo for mod. According to leo Phil is unbiased..so yeah. Sry.
Originally posted by leonidas
yeah, i've enjoyed the hell out of reading this, but judging it...? it would have to be like, REALLY specific, and both would need crystal clear thesis statements in their openings. as a bz, this could get messy. lol
I disagree with those two statements I quoted, as I have done the whole thread, and I will argue against them. If you go back, from my first post, to my last post in thread, those are the sole things I've been arguing about. The rest is just smoke mirrors.
He's defending these statements:
Originally posted by Supermutant
I'm stating that Bullseye stalemating both DD and Elektra simultaneously in one comic, then getting knock down casually by Taskmaster in one shot show inconsistency.
Originally posted by Supermutant
Frank dominate BE on one occasion, BE perform much better as he used Frank to collect a huge pay day on another, and BE dominated Frank in yet a different encounter. The very definition of inconsistency.
...and I'm disagreeing with them.
The funniest part is, I thought I somehow missed a legitimate Taskmaster vs Bullseye fight, in which Pointdexter gets one-shotted - which is why I focused on Bullseye's knowledge of DD/Elektra, and not the BS/Taskmaster fight.
I didn't think he was dumb enough to use that scene as an argument.
The moment I saw that's what he did, well...the battlezone was obvious, just for the lulz.
Originally posted by Deadline
Nope I'd still say that Puniisher is more inconsistent because he loses to canon fodder. Ever see TM get beaten by 3 or 5 guys? Or have have trouble with two?
With canon fodder and lackeys probably since Tasky trains those type of guys, he certainly shouldn't be losing to them. With his ability Tasky should always be a tough fight, but his mindset sometimes and the way some writers used him, goes against that.
Originally posted by Deadline
Seriously though what makes this debate so stupid is that lots of characters study each other, that could pretty much end it. As it's been pointed out I don't remember Phil going into a Bane or Taskmaster thread saying that these characters study their opponents. Oh yeah Punisher pretty much stated that he studies anybody he might meet in combat.
lol of course this is not really a debate. But that's what silly philly was implying with his first post in this thread. It was so easy to point out how stupid and weak that argument was. And ever since then silly philly has gone into mental meltdown mode trying someway to lessen his embarrassment.
Originally posted by Deadline
EDIT: I don't trust leo for mod. According to leo Phil is unbiased..so yeah. Sry.
leo is alright in small doses.