Thanos w/o IG vs. Thor w/o SB

Started by quanchi11242 pages

Originally posted by FrothByte
I read your posts properly in the BZ. But posting multiple links doesn't matter if you're not actually addressing my points properly. Most of what you post don't address my points. Those that do I reply to. When you post enough proof that I am unable to provide counters for them, I admit my loss and relinquish that point, like how you pointed out that my dark elf ships were grossly outnumbered.

But don't expect me to reply to strawman and red herring tactics. If your links don't address my points, don't expect me to waste time answering each and every one of them.

Well I am saying quit asking for me to post stuff I covered in depth in my first battlezone post. You were completely unaware of it proving you did not read it. It is ok just do not lie about it. I do address your limited resources and limited ships.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
And yes obviously he could have killed Thanos, because he surprise attacked him with a weapon designed to kill him lmao.

Are you like just copying whatever Quan says? Do you have a brain of your own?

And no it wasnt Designed with Thanos in mind Lmao

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Youre right I havent done one. Which makes it even more embarrassing for you to chicken out.

Funny little stories you make in your head. Except you were called out. I wasnt.

You lost credibility so I do not take you seriously. It is just an argument or debate there is no secret thing to a battlezone. You would not know though despite it being obvious.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
And yes obviously he could have killed Thanos, because he surprise attacked him with a weapon designed to kill him lmao.

Oh dear, you haven't seen the movie. that does explain a few things.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Oh dear, you haven't seen the movie. that does explain a few things.
Avoiding the issue. Oh Sm you never evolve. You cannot learn.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Are you like just copying whatever Quan says? Do you have a brain of your own?

And no it wasnt Designed with Thanos in mind Lmao


Calm down child.

It's a "Thanos killing weapon", whether it was designed specifically for him is irrelevant. The fact is that Thor suprise attacked him, so that doesn't contradict Russo's statement.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Oh dear, you haven't seen the movie. that does explain a few things.

I've seen the movie 5+ times and literally just watched the scene again on youtube.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
I've seen the movie 5+ times and literally just watched the scene again on youtube.

Then point out the exact quote from the movie where Stormbreaker was stated to be specifically designed to kill Thanos.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Well I am saying quit asking for me to post stuff I covered in depth in my first battlezone post. You were completely unaware of it proving you did not read it. It is ok just do not lie about it. I do address your limited resources and limited ships.

Sorry, but nothing you have posted either here or in the BZ has proven that Thanos sans the IG is the most powerful being in the universe. If you actually posted proof I'd stop asking for it.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Are you like just copying whatever Quan says? Do you have a brain of your own?

And no it wasnt Designed with Thanos in mind Lmao

Are we sure they're not the same person?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Then point out the exact quote from the movie where Stormbreaker was stated to be specifically designed to kill Thanos.

Why does it matter if the weapon was designed specifically for Thanos?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Then point out the exact quote from the movie where Stormbreaker was stated to be specifically designed to kill Thanos.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
Calm down child.

It's a "Thanos killing weapon", whether it was designed specifically for him is irrelevant. The fact is that Thor suprise attacked him, so that doesn't contradict Russo's statement.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx

You claimed it was a weapon designed to kill Thanos, thus me asking for proof that it was actually designed to kill Thanos isn't irrelevant. it's a major part of your original claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You claimed it was a weapon designed to kill Thanos, thus me asking for proof that it was actually designed to kill Thanos isn't irrelevant. it's a major part of your original claim.

It's irrelevant because that's not even what my point was, I don't really give a **** if the weapon was designed specifically for Thanos or not. My point was that Thor surprise attacked him, so that doesn't contradict Russo's statement about Thanos being unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Sorry, but nothing you have posted either here or in the BZ has proven that Thanos sans the IG is the most powerful being in the universe. If you actually posted proof I'd stop asking for it.
I know you will not accept it that is why it is pointless when you ask for more confirmation. You just keep asking for more proof but ignore them hence why I quit providing proof. You ignored your own logic for Banner you do for Korath. It is like watching skip bayless and his nitpicks and poor logic ignored when applied to Tom Brady or any other athlete he likes but he uses it just against athletes he does not like. You are the same way. Inconsistent and not objective.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
It's irrelevant because that's not even what my point was, I don't really give a **** if the weapon was designed specifically for Thanos or not. My point was that Thor surprise attacked him, so that doesn't contradict Russo's statement about Thanos being unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle.

Let's not play games here, you put that in your original claim as a means to downplay the feat. but are now backtracking because you got called on it. do try and be honest.

As for Russo's comment it was that Thanos was "unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle" not that Thanos is unbeatable as long as he isn't surprised. so if Thor beat him beat him in the fight, then yes. it does contradict Russo's statement.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Are we sure they're not the same person?
Yes, since he pled me earlier for the link of the quote. We can ask a moderator to verify since you are so full of accusations and paranoid today.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Let's not play games here, you put that in your original claim as a means to downplay the feat. but are now backtracking because you got called on it. do try and be honest.

As for Russo's comment it was that Thanos was "unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle" not that Thanos is unbeatable as long as he isn't surprised. so if Thor beat him beat him in the fight, then yes. it does contradict Russo's statement.


It's a weapon capable of killing Thanos is what I should have said, you're right. It is a "Thanos killing weapon". Not that it makes any difference.

That is your opinion. In my opinion, and I feel like most would agree, a surprise attack does not qualify as a 1-on-1 battle.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
It's a weapon capable of killing Thanos is what I should have said, you're right. It is a "Thanos killing weapon"

That is your opinion. In my opinion, and I feel like most would agree, a surprise attack does not qualify as a 1-on-1 battle.

You could have just said a weapon or Stormbreaker. but that wouldn't put people in the frame of mind you were going for.

Where does Russo state that a surprise attack doesn't count?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, since he pled me earlier for the link of the quote. We can ask a moderator to verify since you are so full of accusations and paranoid today.

Actually, it would probably be better if you got a ruling regarding interview comments made by directors and how valid they are in discussions.