Thanos w/o IG vs. Thor w/o SB

Originally posted by quanchi112
Except we know the filmmakers have told us becauself his willpower. Korath already says so without possessing a single stone so banner is fine for having an opinion but the in and out of universe statements all lead to Thanos being the most powerful being in the universe.

You accept banners opinion but not koraths or the filmmakers. You cannot be this stupid. It all leads to the same statement. Thanos is the most powerful being in the universe. Filmmakers make it crystal clear. Hell, Thanos was stated as the most powerful back in Gotg one you idiot.

So now you're changing goalposts? No longer is your claim "he's the most powerful" but now it's simply "he has the most willpower"?

Korath doesn't know every single being in the universe, so his opinion means squat.

As far as the Russo's go, I don't recall them saying a stoneless Thanos is the most powerful being in the universe. And even if they did, they aren't the law when it comes to the MCU as a whole. They directed 3 movies. If word of mouth is all you care for then Captain Marvel would easily defeat Thanos because Feige claimed her most powerful. And Feige's word >>> Russo's word.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So now you're changing goalposts? No longer is your claim "he's the most powerful" but now it's simply "he has the most willpower"?

Korath doesn't know every single being in the universe, so his opinion means squat.

As far as the Russo's go, I don't recall them saying a stoneless Thanos is the most powerful being in the universe. And even if they did, they aren't the law when it comes to the MCU as a whole. They directed 3 movies. If word of mouth is all you care for then Captain Marvel would easily defeat Thanos because Feige claimed her most powerful. And Feige's word >>> Russo's word.

"He's not using it," Russo said. "This is to show that Thanos, the Genghis Khan of the Marvel Universe, he's unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle. He's conquered thousands of worlds. He's a much more polished fighter than the Hulk, and Thor, and Loki."'

This along with Korath's statement makes it pretty damn clear that Thanos is the top dog even without the stones.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
"Here you see the early establishment of just how fearsome Thanos is even without, he's got one stone here and I don't think he's even using it," McFeely said.

"He's not using it," Russo said. "This is to show that Thanos, the Genghis Khan of the Marvel Universe, he's unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle. He's conquered thousands of worlds. He's a much more polished fighter than the Hulk, and Thor, and Loki."

This along with Korath's statement makes it pretty damn clear that Thanos is the top dog even without the stones.

Uhmm.. ok? Nowhere in there do I see the Russo's say that Thanos is the most powerful. It seems like you and Quan are intent on misinterpreting the Russo's quote even when it directly contradicts on screen feats. For example, how exactly do you think a stoneless Thanos can defeat Ego one on one?

Originally posted by FrothByte
So now you're changing goalposts? No longer is your claim "he's the most powerful" but now it's simply "he has the most willpower"?

Korath doesn't know every single being in the universe, so his opinion means squat.

As far as the Russo's go, I don't recall them saying a stoneless Thanos is the most powerful being in the universe. And even if they did, they aren't the law when it comes to the MCU as a whole. They directed 3 movies. If word of mouth is all you care for then Captain Marvel would easily defeat Thanos because Feige claimed her most powerful. And Feige's word >>> Russo's word.

Neither does Bruce Banner you moron. But somehow that logic does not apply to Bruce just Korath. Korath has had direct contact with Thanos whereas Hulk had limited interaction and came to this conclusion pretty quickly. When you use logic you have to apply it to Bruce banner not just the other guy Korath.

You really do not read everything I post. This is kind of sad I chose you for a battlezone tbh because you are like josh a waste of evidence.

Here I will do it again since you missed it the first five times I posted it.

I will boldface it so you can follow along.

https://comicbook.com/marvel/2018/08/03/avengers-infinity-war-thanos-powerful-without-infinity-stones/

^ That is the link I provided in your first battlezone post you skimmed over. Here is the part I copy and pasted for you.

From the films opening scene he already has the Power Stone, and by the time the opening title plays he obtains the Time Stone as well. But wielding two Infinity Stones does not make him the most powerful villain in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. He already had that distinction before his hunt for the stones because of his STRONG WILL.

>"He's unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle"
>"Thanos is the most powerful being in the universe"
>"He's a much more polished fighter than the Hulk, and Thor, and Loki."

/thread

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
>"He's unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle"
>"Thanos is the most powerful being in the universe"
>"He's a much more polished fighter than the Hulk, and Thor, and Loki."

/thread

😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am saying he is the most powerful being in the universe the filmmakers explain it is due to his willpower. I cannot tell if you are slow I am leaning towards that way. I covered this all with links in my first battlezone post but you obviously flewright over the links. Maybe you were at work maybe you did not care. Who knows.

Neither does Bruce Banner you moron. But somehow that logic does not apply to Bruce just Korath. Korath has had direct contact with Thanos whereas Hulk had limited interaction and came to this conclusion pretty quickly. When you use logic you have to apply it to Bruce banner not just the other guy Korath.

You really do not read everything I post. This is kind of sad I chose you for a battlezone tbh because you are like josh a waste of evidence.

Here I will do it again since you missed it the first five times I posted it.

I will boldface it so you can follow along.

https://comicbook.com/marvel/2018/08/03/avengers-infinity-war-thanos-powerful-without-infinity-stones/

^ That is the link I provided in your first battlezone post you skimmed over. Here is the part I copy and pasted for you.

From the films opening scene he already has the Power Stone, and by the time the opening title plays he obtains the Time Stone as well. [B]But wielding two Infinity Stones does not make him the most powerful villain in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. He already had that distinction before his hunt for the stones because of his STRONG WILL. [/B]

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
Don't bother, they're in denial.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am saying he is the most powerful being in the universe the filmmakers explain it is due to his willpower. I cannot tell if you are slow I am leaning towards that way. I covered this all with links in my first battlezone post but you obviously flewright over the links. Maybe you were at work maybe you did not care. Who knows.

Neither does Bruce Banner you moron. But somehow that logic does not apply to Bruce just Korath. Korath has had direct contact with Thanos whereas Hulk had limited interaction and came to this conclusion pretty quickly. When you use logic you have to apply it to Bruce banner not just the other guy Korath.

You really do not read everything I post. This is kind of sad I chose you for a battlezone tbh because you are like josh a waste of evidence.

Here I will do it again since you missed it the first five times I posted it.

I will boldface it so you can follow along.

https://comicbook.com/marvel/2018/08/03/avengers-infinity-war-thanos-powerful-without-infinity-stones/

^ That is the link I provided in your first battlezone post you skimmed over. Here is the part I copy and pasted for you.

From the films opening scene he already has the Power Stone, and by the time the opening title plays he obtains the Time Stone as well. [B]But wielding two Infinity Stones does not make him the most powerful villain in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. He already had that distinction before his hunt for the stones because of his STRONG WILL. [/B]

Oh I read your BZ links... but they don't really matter since none of them answered my arguments which is your team still has no way of getting through the forcefield and no way to see the dark elf ships and no way to stop Hela from impaling them from safety.

Also, Imp already made a ruling that websites don't superseed onscreen feats. So your links matter little.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Oh I read your BZ links... but they don't really matter since none of them answered my arguments which is your team still has no way of getting through the forcefield and no way to see the dark elf ships and no way to stop Hela from impaling them from safety.

Also, Imp already made a ruling that websites don't superseed onscreen feats. So your links matter little.

This is why evidence is useless you want to ignore it. Your mind is made up like josh. Evidence does not matter. The guys who made the film corroborate the obvious but still you want to cover your eyes and play make believe.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
It is confirmed by an out of universe source:

"Here you see the early establishment of just how fearsome Thanos is even without, he's got one stone here and I don't think he's even using it," McFeely said.

"He's not using it," Russo said. "This is to show that Thanos, the Genghis Khan of the Marvel Universe, he's unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle. He's conquered thousands of worlds. He's a much more polished fighter than the Hulk, and Thor, and Loki."

This is referring to his fight with the Hulk.

We don't use out of universe sources, though even if we did. nothing you just quoted says anything about him being the most powerful being in the universe. in fact Russo seems to be talking about Thanos' skill. what with calling him a much more polished fighter.

IOW, Russo's statement is rather ambiguous.

Originally posted by Silent Master
We don't use out of universe sources, though even if we did. nothing you just quoted says anything about him being the most powerful being in the universe. in fact Russo seems to be talking about Thanos' skill. what with calling him a much more polished fighter.

IOW, Russo's statement is rather ambiguous.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
Why? Because you don't like what they say? 😂 "Unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle" is not ambiguous at all LMAO. nice try

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
Why? Because you don't like what they say? 😂 "Unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle" is not ambiguous at all 😂 😂 😂 nice try

Russo attributed that to Thanos' skill, not power. Not that it matters as like I said, we don't use out of universe sources.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
>"He's unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle"
>"Thanos is the most powerful being in the universe"
>"He's a much more polished fighter than the Hulk, and Thor, and Loki."

/thread

Originally posted by quanchi112
If you read the post why ask for this again and again. You did not read it and you believe your opinion is all that matters. Hela will be defeated just like she was on the film. Destroy Asgard is the idea. Let her hang out on a terrace.

This is why evidence is useless you want to ignore it. Your mind is made up like josh. Evidence does not matter. The guys who made the film corroborate the obvious but still you want to cover your eyes and play make believe.

Asgard was destroyed by Surtur. As far as I know, he's not on Thanos's team. Now why don't you go back to the BZ and debate me there? Answer my arguments there and we'll see what happens.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Russo attributed that to Thanos' skill, not power. Not that it matters as like I said, we don't use out of universe sources.

😂

Originally posted by Silent Master
Russo attributed that to Thanos' skill, not power. Not that it matters as like I said, we don't use out of universe sources.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Asgard was destroyed by Surtur. As far as I know, he's not on Thanos's team. Now why don't you go back to the BZ and debate me there? Answer my arguments there and we'll see what happens.

Originally posted by xPRIMEx
Why? Because you don't like what they say? 😂 "Unbeatable in 1-on-1 battle" is not ambiguous at all LMAO. nice try

And yet he lost a 1v1 battle at the end to Thor.

So you have 2 choices here. Either

1) you think the Russos are completely brain dead and do not have a clue what they are talking about. Or

2) You keep quoting them out of context.

Its your choice.