Originally posted by Darth ThorAnd he goes on to say he is going to Nidavellir to acquire Thanos killing weapons. We see his idea start to form to take him to the point he is going to the same dwarf who created the gauntlet that contains the power of the stones themselves.
He looks at his spoon and says "I don't need a spoon, I need a Hammer"Of course it's going to be a new hammer given his old one was destroyed. Duh.
So he goes to the right guy who creates his finest weapon everyday superior to his hammer but it does not matter since he already went there to acquire weapons capable of killing Thanos the most powerful being in the universe. Do you think his old hammer is capable of killing Thanos?
He says he had a chance with a weapon capable of killing the most powerful guy in the universe according to Thor. Try to think objectively on what the words mean together not selecting some and trying to skew their meaning.
Funny since I never even stated Thor with Mjolnir beats Thanos.Just that Thor seemed to think he definitely has no chance without Mjolnir, or a similar weapon.
He has no idea at that point that he was going to get the strongest weapon made for Asgard.[/B]
Ironic since your arguments are getting shredded. You even admitted you were in the wrong thread and have become a complete biased joke in this thread.
No you have started with one good argument today, then quickly proceeded to more trolling.I will decide if you are trolling or if you are coming up with anything worth paying attention to.
[/B]
There was a momentum change but Thor never defeated him. It gave him the advantage but he did not prevail. Thanos proved no parity since he quickly and desicobely beat the Hulk. That is the differencebetween two peers or someone out of your league. Once Thanos countered he quickly destroyed the Hulk.
No you are just refusing to admit that there was no parity once the Lightning came down.Everyone could see that. There were not many people still arguing Hulk and Thor as equals after Ragnorak. Because it was clear and obvious Hulk was in out of his depth which is why GM had to aid Hulk and essentially forefeit the fair 1 v 1.
[/B]
They are peers only a biased fanboy would say otherwise. Thornevereven defeated him and just hit him a few times to which the Hulk recovered. Quit being so emotional all the time this is why you are pathetic.
Thor did not faze him. That is what the intro showed. Hulk did Thor did not. Hulk is stronger than Thor, clearly. But they are not equals in every category. Thor is more skilled than the Hulk, etc. but comparing the two they are definitely peers. Thanos would destroy either one in a one on one setting.
Troll point, and you are not even being consistent. One minute claiming Thor and Hulk are equals, the next minute claiming Thor can't even faze Thanos.
[/B]
[/QUOTE]
Even Iron Man was capable of fazing him, so don't be retarded.
[/B][/QUOTE]I never said Thor could never faze him only in the first scene he was unable to but the Hulk clearly did. Just stating the obvious you woman.
That is fine he was not aware of what Eitri would create but he was sure he would create a weapon capable of killing Thanos. That is the point. At no point did he ever say he would create a replica of his hammer so it is a false distinction you’re trying to make. What is important is he said he would create the Thanos killing weapon.
You keep pretending he never mentioned the word Hammer. Or the place he went to get his new weapon wasn't the same place Mjolnir was built. [/B]
Well we see Thor with a weapon and a cheapshot against Thanos after he just tangled with the Hulk. We also know what the directors think which corroborates the screen facts. Thor does not hold a candle to Thanos in a one on one fight. I did see the film and I know what the director said and how. Thor fares with a weapon and a cheapshot. Not well, kid.
No, He admits he does not stand a chance WITHOUT A WEPAON against a Thanos with AT LEAST 2 INFINITY STONES.Try watching the film more often so you know where we are up to at each point of the film we are discussing.
In any case I don't believe Thor could take Thanos without Stormbreaker. Just that he had the best chance and the equivalency to Hulk is no longer valid. [/B]
You admit he loses so just stew in your own Thanos envy.
Originally posted by xPRIMEx
The MCU clearly wanted to establish Thanos as the most powerful being in the universe, why else would they include that in the script? And Ronan confirmed it when he responded "not anymore", as he used the power stone.
And Bruce Banner said Hulkbuster already beat the crap out of the Hulk. Does that make it true?
The line was in there to illustrate Thanos is The Big Bad in the MCU. Now If someone reliable from Asgard confirmed the same then that would be different.
Oh and convenient how Quan makes his drivel unquotable.
Thor was clearly looking for a replacement for Mjolnir. That is why he says I NEED A HAMMER.
And he didn't know Eitri made Thanos the gauntlet until he got there, so that's a desperate point.
And LOL No, it's only you and Josh claiming Hulk and Thor were still peers at the end of Ragnarok. No one with even an ounce of objectivity is calling them peers in anything besides from physical strength anymore.
Originally posted by Darth ThorFilm makers confirm Thanos is the most powerful without the stones. Cry more.
And Bruce Banner said Hulkbuster already beat the crap out of the Hulk. Does that make it true?The line was in there to illustrate Thanos is The Big Bad in the MCU. Now If someone reliable from Asgard confirmed the same then that would be different.
Originally posted by Darth ThorHe went for a Thanos killling weapon. Point is Eitri made the best weapons in the universe and never said he wanted an exact replica of his old hammer.
Oh and convenient how Quan makes his drivel unquotable.Thor was clearly looking for a replacement for Mjolnir. That is why he says I NEED A HAMMER.
And he didn't know Eitri made Thanos the gauntlet until he got there, so that's a desperate point.
And LOL No, it's only you and Josh claiming Hulk and Thor were still peers at the end of Ragnarok. No one with even an ounce of objectivity is calling them peers in anything besides from physical strength anymore.
False, a momentum change did not propel Thor out of his league. Feige would laugh at your bias. Honestly, it is pitiful. Thanos is not a peer but Thor is. Fact is he never beat the Hulk so continue to tell me how you feel it will not change the facts.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He went for a Thanos killling weapon. Point is Eitri made the best weapons in the universe and never said he wanted an exact replica of his old hammer.False, a momentum change did not propel Thor out of his league. Feige would laugh at your bias. Honestly, it is pitiful. Thanos is not a peer but Thor is. Fact is he never beat the Hulk so continue to tell me how you feel it will not change the facts.
Of course he will go for a better weapon if one is available Lmao. But he was clearly looking for a new Hammer. I.e. A Replacement Hammer.
Funny though how Thor never went to Eitri for a Hela killing weapon. Could it be because Hela already showed she can Crush Mjolnir?!
Yeah its completely comparable. GM having Hulks back against Thor is again totally comparable 😂