How to Recognize a Fascist

Started by Emperordmb9 pages

Originally posted by Putinbot1
So you believe in being the thought Police even if someones religion is different and they follow the rules of your Society, if they have different morals regardless of if they act upon them they should be treated differently... That's kind of Fascist.

I just said they should be held to the same legal standard as everyone else in this country.

Originally posted by Robtard
I asked the question for clarification, so calm thyself.

Disagreed. Look how emboldened they where during the 2016 election, shows they're a prominent force, you're also not taking into account the fringe supporters of these groups, the people who won't march with them and chant hatred openly, but will find solidarity to their cause behind closed doors.

By your own reasoning, if they're insignificant, than so are these "Leftist" you're clamoring on about.

Well Leftists are insignificant they don't tend to be pro firearms etc. Janus is from the U.K. how many leftists have killed Politicians for ideology mate?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I just said they should be held to the same legal standard as everyone else in this country.
Well not exactly but if that's what you mean fine, then you agree with equality.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Not really as the left don't label themselves that or have those labels attributed to them by anyone credible, the Alt right, white supremacists and Neo Nazi's do.

Oh boy, Antifa is the brown shirt communist of the left and that's just literally pointing out a fact rather then playing down a reality you want to believe in.

Then again the label Alt Right is painted like the star of david on folks on the right without logic but feefees.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Oh boy, Antifa is the brown shirt communist of the left and that's just literally pointing out a fact rather then playing down a reality you want to believe in.

Then again the label Alt Right is painted like the star of david on folks on the right without logic but feefees.

As I always say when they start shooting and bombing and killing, then they are the same threat level as the Neo Nazi's till then, they are not.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Well not exactly but if that's what you mean fine, then you agree with equality.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
If they are in this country they should still be held to the same legal standard regardless,

The only distinctions I made were that immigration policy should be conscious of someone's cultural values and whether or not they're compatible with the society they're trying to immigrate into. And that people in a society should be free to criticize each other's values.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
The only distinctions I made were that immigration policy should be conscious of someone's cultural values and whether or not they're compatible with the society they're trying to immigrate into. And that people in a society should be free to criticize each other's values.

If someone says they will follow the rules then they should be taken on face value regardless, most Muslims in the US follow the rules and your Universities like my own can't get enough of the Saudi buck. Bin Laden was hardly a poor Muslim.

Well if someone thinks women should be treated like second class citizens or thinks people should ideally be killed if they speak ill of Muhammad, then I'm gonna feel a lot sketchier about extending the privilege of entering my country to them because I'm interested in preserving the values of my country.

It would be the same thing if someone who wanted a white ethnostate wanted to immigrate to the US and promised they'd follow all of the rules, I still think the immigration policy should be more hesitant to allow such a person in.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
As I always say when they start shooting and bombing and killing, then they are the same threat level as the Neo Nazi's till then, they are not.

How about in the UK, where do all the knifers and acid splashers fall in your view of the political spectrum.

I wonder how people would react if you use the same arguments for groups other than the American right. Let's see, just by changing a couple of words. we would get a statement like this.

A lot of muslims are terrorits, then you have to consider all their fringe supporters, the people who won't march with them and chant hatred openly, but will find solidarity to their cause behind closed doors.

Would the people arguing about how a lot of people on the right are Nazis also agree with the quoted statement?

Who has denied that extreme Islamist are not a problem? They are, they kill people and push a political agendas depending on said groups? eg Obviously there are non ISIS members who support ISIS' cause.

I understand you were trying to be clever with another "gotcha!" type of post, but all you did is support the opposite.

A Little bit of Robbie's inner Loony Lefty just died a little.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Would the people arguing about how a lot of people on the right are Nazis also agree with the quoted statement?

I don't think there is any group that is as overtly aggressive as the neo-nazi when they are organized in the US.

I could be wrong it just seems as though at the grassroots the extreme right takes the cake.

mmmmNo. You are Pretty WRONG.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]mmmmNo. You are Pretty WRONG. [/B]

Ok I said it seems so I could be wrong, support your position.

Thanks to rob for being constant and agreeing that saying a lot of Muslims are terrorists is just as fair a statement as saying a lot on the right are Nazis.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thanks to rob for being constant and agreeing that saying a lot of Muslims are terrorists is just as fair a statement as saying a lot on the right are Nazis.

AntiFa has show they they are Extremely Organized and Well Funded.
And also Extremely Violent in which videos have shown groups of them all but planning Out Right Murder on People and Groups.

Originally posted by snowdragon
I don't think there is any group that is as overtly aggressive as the neo-nazi when they are organized in the US.

I could be wrong it just seems as though at the grassroots the extreme right takes the cake.

I'm not talking about just America and extreme Islamists are far more overtly aggressive when organized. if you don't believe me. go visit a country like Afghanistan or Syria and publicly speak out about anything they disagree with.

BTW, don't actually do that. you'll be killed.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thanks to rob for being constant and agreeing that saying a lot of Muslims are terrorists is just as fair a statement as saying a lot on the right are Nazis.

You're spinning what I said into something else now, my comment wasn't on either's prominence. Seems you're doing your 'Time-Waster-Troll' thing again and I'm just not interested, so have the last word/spin.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]AntiFa has show they they are Extremely Organized and Well Funded.
And also Extremely Violent in which videos have shown groups of them all but planning Out Right Murder on People and Groups.
[/B]

True, but to be fair. the extreme Alt-right is currently more violent than they are.