Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]What you like to imagine people do when Not On Line can't be claimed as Actual FACTS. [/B]
This is full proof science. After all, some guy in the 70s read some diaries and then it was mentioned in an article by The Guardian.
Doesn't get much more concrete than that.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]WHy should you get "Worried" about Incels. It aint like they are passing on their shitty genes. Like how the mass majority of EU nations are at a almost
0% native birth rate.Too bad the Invading Peoples are breeding like Radicalized Rabbits.
[/B]
Well a deranged person would say "worry cuz they have stuff in common with fascists and islamic terrorists!"
Originally posted by Putinbot1
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/04/what-do-incels-fascists-and-terrorists-have-in-common-violent-misogynyThe apparent connection of recent murders in Toronto to the “incel” movement has led to a torrent of commentary. Too much of it has appeared to rationalise Alek Minassian’s actions. Just yesterday, New York Times columnist Ross Douthat made their major gripe – that the world denies them sex – into the basis of a kind of seminar room thought experiment, wondering whether a redistribution of sex might not be “entirely responsive to the logic of late-modern sexual life”.
But to accept this is to take their story of victimhood as read. We shouldn’t.
To get the measure of this movement, and its danger, we could turn to their sympathisers on Twitter, who have been busy blaming “‘empowered’ w*myn on oral contraceptives” and “anti-male culture” for the incel phenomenon, and warning of insurrection.
Spot on story and it's telling who it trig'd in here. Very telling, the usual suspects.
Originally posted by Robtard
Like the fact you whined about people making sock accounts when you made one after getting a easy two-week ban to play the victim, cry that you'd never come back; only to come crawling back? Good stuff? Nay, GREAT stuff eat
As leftist cultists love to scream "false equivalency!"
A sad pathetic troll who has repeatedly been banned, come back, been banned, come back...is not the same. It's hilarious you thought you had a gotcha here.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Says the guy with Protected Status on this Board.Robbie is such a trigger beithc.
[/B]
I hope he pushes the issue lol. I'll compare my own one sock to the pathetic behavior of Putinbots many many socks any day. Remember when he registered under a name in order to talk shit about himself, and then was caught and banned? That shit was HILARIOUS.
Lol if you want some real entertainment go to the members list and click W. I wanted to see how many socks this sad soul has truly had. There were 108 pages for W, I took a chance and went immediately to page 50(figured names beginning with "Wh" would be around there), turns out I only had to go one page over to find this:
Lol...and those are just his socks that have the word "whirly" in some form.
Originally posted by Surtur
As leftist cultists love to scream "false equivalency!"A sad pathetic troll who has repeatedly been banned, come back, been banned, come back...is not the same. It's hilarious you thought you had a gotcha here.
That's not fair, though. He did it for "lols." It was a different time on the internet, then.
Now he's mostly just a normal poster who trolls occasionally.
And some of the same mods (I think) that banned his socks before are letting him stay, now.
It's not sad and pathetic: it was just funsies.
Edit - And to the redistribution of intercourse suggestion - I understand the concept. But that would have to be solely based on volunteers. Personal freedom is far far more important to me than solving dysfunctional, suicidal, and sometimes homicidal social issues. Yes, I am taking the stance that it is better people commit homicides and suicides than to force women to have intercourse with disenfranchised men.
A compromise is to make prostitution legal and offer counseling on how to be better men in this modern world.
Originally posted by Surtur
I hope he pushes the issue lol. I'll compare my own one sock to the pathetic behavior of Putinbots many many socks any day. Remember when he registered under a name in order to talk shit about himself, and then was caught and banned? That shit was HILARIOUS.
Never socked before. The one time I was banned for life, I never went back.
Unless...
If you switch accounts with someone, just to see if anyone notices, is that a sock?
Never been done here, but in a much older, much smaller community.
Originally posted by dadudemon
That's not fair, though. He did it for "lols." It was a different time on the internet, then.Now he's mostly just a normal poster who trolls occasionally.
And some of the same mods (I think) that banned his socks before are letting him stay, now.
It's not sad and pathetic: it was just funsies.
We'll agree to disagree I suppose. I understand trolling, I've done it myself. I even understand coming back a few times after a ban. IMO it enters the territory of sad when you get to 31 socks lol. And that's just with his Whirly ones.
I don't want him banned, IMO one should only be banned for stuff like posting kiddie porn or threatening to kill people.
Originally posted by cdtm
Never socked before. The one time I was banned for life, I never went back.Unless...
If you switch accounts with someone, just to see if anyone notices, is that a sock?
Never been done here, but in a much older, much smaller community.
The definition of a sock seems to be that it's a name one starts posting under once their username has been banned. So unless you were banned no you weren't socking. There isn't anything against the rules if two people willingly decide to swap accounts, at least I don't think there is.