Originally posted by Sin I AMYeah I said it was good you dope. It's a real reading
I personally like Hello Kitty, Bran you offended me. You're cancelled.
You like it because it's popular and it's popular because it's the second most interesting franchise in history. No arguments here.
Originally posted by One Big Mob
Concession accepted. Easy win. Make it official Sin.I agree sales mean a lot though, which is why Superman and Batman are among the top 3 most interesting [b]comic
characters with the best comic storylines in their comic arcs in comic books on this comic board. And I'm glad you agree friend. 👆Or can you still not read concession maker? [/B]
If you re read my post again you would understand my point about Marvel being an independent company and was the top beating DC for decades who had Warner backing them since 73. Hence why i cited sales, and statistics backing it up. None of this is up for dispute.
I don't think...hmmm...I don't think so much that Al is a loser per se. I mean yes he loses(r). But I think it's easier to just bash him and overlook the deeper concerns at play here. I think his reality view is stemming from maybe a childhood drama perhaps? Maybe he's morbidly obese. I think maybe deep down inside it's a cry a for help. Maybe when he wipes after he poops his finger strays too close to the hole. Things like that can mess up your world view. We should be encouraging and not bash the differently abled.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
If you re read my post again you would understand my point about Marvel being an independent company and was the top beating DC for decades who had Warner backing them since 73. Hence why i cited sales, and statistics backing it up. None of this is up for dispute.
If you learned how to read you would have realized that I'm ok with that but you've danced around your own logic making Superman and Batman the top 1-5 most interesting characters in comics.
Marvel is more interesting than DC because of sales. Good. Superman is more interesting than Thor because of sales.
There's nothing deep here. It's quite frankly bewildering that you keep trying to strawman me while latino dancing in your frilly suit around this.
You have no individuality beyond Marvel and hating Superman I get that, but I know you understand how retarded you are being when you purposefully ignore a question I asked where you knew any answer would result in you well looking retarded. Or you have no favorite series going back to the illiteracy thing.
Let's try an easier one.
Is comic Batman more interesting than comic Iron Man?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeEERdbfH0cApple slaves REVOLT, destroy factory over $7/month pay
Originally posted by One Big Mob
If you learned how to read you would have realized that I'm ok with that but you've danced around your own logic making Superman and Batman the top 1-5 most interesting characters in comics.Marvel is more interesting than DC because of sales. Good. Superman is more interesting than Thor because of sales.
There's nothing deep here. It's quite frankly bewildering that you keep trying to strawman me while latino dancing in your frilly suit around this.
You have no individuality beyond Marvel and hating Superman I get that, but I know you understand how retarded you are being when you purposefully ignore a question I asked where you knew any answer would result in you well looking retarded. Or you have no favorite series going back to the illiteracy thing.
Let's try an easier one.
Is comic Batman more interesting than comic Iron Man?
Let me dumber it down for you. the reason why Marvel has so much better isn't the movies I mentioned comic sales, TV series, I didn't even mentioned Videogames. Until Arkham DC games would always flop. Seriously from Marvel vs Capcom, X-men Legion, X-men Academy, Ultimate Alliance, and ect Marvel was killing Videogames for decades.
The REASON why Marvel has a higher amount of sales and can charge more is because they are valued more and have successes other companies in plubshing can only dream of. both have been telling the same stories but Marvel has been very creative latley. DC litterally just had 3 Crisis but called them Dark Knights metal , Death Metal and the last is Heroes in Crisis.
Hell even when Marvel re-did secret wars notice that new story was nothing like the first 2.
It's that ****ing simple, you cannot be this hard headed. I'm too old to be educating you youngsters bout a simple shit like this ffs
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilThat about sums up that post.
Let me [b]dumber it down for you. [/B]
I'm not sure what the posturing is about when you're not even talking about anything in my post? And you keep using the same type of logic that if distilled to purely comic characters as opposed to companies that it leads to something you need to keep moving the goalpost back to Marvel being better because of mostly not-comics. A need to divert away. Literally cannot fathom talking about it. Nothing complicated at all, just need to ignore it and pretend you know something.
You're having a conversation with yourself with zero awareness.
Marvel good so there! Marvel be good all areas predicated on sales. Batman comics are better than Thor comics based on sales... ? No Marvel movies better than DC AHHHHHH!
I don't want to hammer in on how retarded you are because you just copied me and it'd be as circular as you basing things needing to be good based on sales and they sell because they're good, but...
You realize I absolutely hate DC comics right now? I just think your circular reasoning is retarded and you can't even pretend to apply the same standards to individual comic characters. If you understand the difference between a movie and a game then I'm sure you should understand looking at a game or a movie in a bubble right as their own thing? Now imagine you took comic characters and didn't use movies or game feats and they had their own canon? Now imag...
Nah nevermind, not worth it. Complete blockhead.
Originally posted by One Big Mob
That about sums up that post.I'm not sure what the posturing is about when you're not even talking about anything in my post? And you keep using the same type of logic that if distilled to purely comic characters as opposed to companies that it leads to something you need to keep moving the goalpost back to Marvel being better because of mostly not-comics. A need to divert away. Literally cannot fathom talking about it. Nothing complicated at all, just need to ignore it and pretend you know something.
You're having a conversation with yourself with zero awareness.
Marvel good so there! Marvel be good all areas predicated on sales. Batman comics are better than Thor comics based on sales... ? No Marvel movies better than DC AHHHHHH!
I don't want to hammer in on how retarded you are because you just copied me and it'd be as circular as you basing things needing to be good based on sales and they sell because they're good, but...
You realize I absolutely hate DC comics right now? I just think your circular reasoning is retarded and you can't even pretend to apply the same standards to individual comic characters. If you understand the difference between a movie and a game then I'm sure you should understand looking at a game or a movie in a bubble right as their own thing? Now imagine you took comic characters and didn't use movies or game feats and they had their own canon? Now imag...
Nah nevermind, not worth it. Complete blockhead.
You said nothing relevant to my post, you're dismissed.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil"The reason why Marvel makes more money is that it makes more money"
Let me dumber it down for you. the reason why Marvel has so much better isn't the movies I mentioned comic sales, TV series, I didn't even mentioned Videogames. Until Arkham DC games would always flop. Seriously from Marvel vs Capcom, X-men Legion, X-men Academy, Ultimate Alliance, and ect Marvel was killing Videogames for decades.
The REASON why Marvel has a higher amount of sales and can charge more is because they are valued more and have successes other companies in plubshing can only dream of.
Nicely done. Keep shifting your point until it's just a tautology.
Originally posted by SmurphAre you denying that Marvel makes more money than DC and is therefore more interesting because they make money because they're interesting and they're interesting because they make money and they make money because...
"The reason why Marvel makes more money is that it makes more money"Nicely done. Keep shifting your point until it's just a tautology.
Because whether you were or weren't you better prepare for Marvel movies pal!
Originally posted by One Big MobMarvel's more interesting because it sells more books and if you disagree that sales prove quality then I'll tell you that they also sell other stuff and so sales prove quality and quality drives sales but also this only applies to Marvel because DC sells stuff and all of it sucks and none of it's interesting and DC isn't Marvel
Are you denying that Marvel makes more money than DC and is therefore more interesting because they make money because they're interesting and they're interesting because they make money and they make money because...Because whether you were or weren't you better prepare for Marvel movies pal!
Originally posted by MrMind
I doubt Alberto is how old he says
Alberto is eight years old.
Mods are breaking KMC's rules by allowing him to post.
Under 13's
We do not allow the registration for users under the age of 13. This is basically for their own protection and our need to comply with US Law, especially the COPPA.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/misc.php?action=rules
Pr, you're going to the worst CIA prison on the planet.