Originally posted by carver9
And I will probably keep using them to prove a negative. Once you all stop jerking DC characters, I'll stray away from countering your argument with similar showings.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
How can you prove a negative...when it was Abhi who used recent showing, and you're the one who used an old one?
The point is, I only mention it for a reason, only for a reason, not as an indication of Hulks current power level. In the sane thread, I mentioned Spiderman UN withstanding attack as well. I'm guessing you think that I think Spiderman is that strong as well?
Originally posted by carver9
The point is, I only mention it for a reason, only for a reason, not as an indication of Hulks current power level. In the sane thread, I mentioned Spiderman UN withstanding attack as well. I'm guessing you think that I think Spiderman is that strong as well?
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
No, I think you misunderstood the point here.
The point is you will use(and have used) old showings to counter recent showings.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Plus, if you want talk consistency. How many times does Hulk go into WBH?
Originally posted by abhilegend
Name any of the Marvel characters who can shatter a solar system by the shockwaves of their fights. I know WBH can't.
Originally posted by carver9
Is that even canon to Orion and even if it was, lol, Hulk have better fts like destroying a Universe for one. The same Universe you tried to downplay because they got to it through a door (Superman was able to travel to World Forger dimension through a door).
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Plus, if you want talk consistency. How many times does Hulk go into WBH?
You're missing the point, lol. You're using Pre Crisis showings as an indication on how powerful current Superman is. I'm using Hulk destroying a Universe to shut people TF up and do not think Hulk is that powerful. HUGE DIFFERENCE.
Hulk has went World Breaker enough for it to be a legitimate showing for him. I don't even know why you're mentioning that when I don't bring up WBH in a thread that doesn't involve him when most of the time, he doesn't need it (to beat people like Superman).
Originally posted by carver9
You're missing the point, lol. You're using Pre Crisis showings as an indication on how powerful current Superman is. I'm using Hulk destroying a Universe to shut people TF up and do not think Hulk is that powerful. HUGE DIFFERENCE.Hulk has went World Breaker enough for it to be a legitimate showing for him. I don't even know why you're mentioning that when I don't bring up WBH in a thread that doesn't involve him when most of the time, he doesn't need it (to beat people like Superman).
Originally posted by carver9
Again, Hulk is NOT a universe destroyer. I've always argued against using antique scans anyways. I don't even know why you brought me into this when I've been arguing against using classic scans for years now.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Parasite Imp and the amped Parasite seem pretty powerful
https://ibb.co/5sQn1QX
https://ibb.co/3TKf2GC
https://ibb.co/MnMkvmk
All of them looked pretty uber
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998So go ahead and embrace the stupidity. Did current Superman's career begin in the 1940s? It's like... the most basic consequence of the argument you're making. One you keep trying to flee but... either stand for something or don't.
It seems you're in the denial though.
I don't think I need to prove a goal that you sets here/proves an argument I don't make.It's *you* who assert that Superman's emerging time is some substantial evidence, while in reality, it really just something you can easily chalk up to comic timeline things. Since, by your logic, Hal shouldn't have begun his career in 1959
As for whether or not my perspective is something "witless propaganda"
Scott Snyder agrees with my interpretation
Two mods on this site agree with that interpretationSo again, it really seems just you're in the denial here
Originally posted by ODG
So go ahead and embrace the stupidity. Did current Superman's career begin in the 1940s? It's like... the most basic consequence of the argument you're making. One you keep trying to flee but... either stand for something or don't.
As for "trying to flee" part. Isn't you are the one who constantly dodge the comic book time(as, literally explained on-panel), and mods opinions?
ODG:" Why Superman doesn't emergy in 40s!!!?"
Me:" As the comics explained, the flow of time doesn't always follow. Or you can just google this trope"
ODG:" It doesn't explain!!! Posted scans to show Superman emerged in 40s!!!"
Your position is kind of retarded, don't you think?
I mean, if you've nothing to say instead of making an non-existence "basic"(which you can't prove it has any impact to my argument since the comics already gave answers), then you're basically just repeated your opinions/feelings/theories without anything to prove it
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998Isnt that Superman Red/Blue comic also the one that retconned a pre-crisis comic to show that Superman was basically raped every day for eight months.
You also have Superman directly refered his adventures in pre-crisis eraAnd I don't think your feeling matters that much when two mods actually agree with the notion.
As they said, if you don't like it, all you need to is making clear which version you're referring to.
Others have no obligations to indulge your feelingsEdit:
Also, it quite moot point that to ask a comics character's adventures on a specifical period, no?
Especially as explained even in pre-crisis comics, that the time period is moving along with the character's period.
https://ibb.co/vmzhmjWI.E, Superman/boy would forever be 14 years old/29 years old, so the time era they're acting is constantly changing. But it doesn't mean the stories set before 1970-85 are suddenly non-canon to Earth-1 Superman
Do we really need to argue that everything is cannon 🙁
Originally posted by Smurph
Isnt that Superman Red/Blue comic also the one that retconned a pre-crisis comic to show that Superman was basically raped every day for eight months.Do we really need to argue that everything is cannon 🙁
Though, all jokes aside. That comic actually didn't explicitly state Superman was raped.
Superman was powerless and was tortured in the story. Superman Red/Blue basically stated the same thing
Originally posted by Smurph
It was pretty explicit.
Not sure how is this pretty explicit though.