Originally posted by Robtard
I also hold the POTUS to a higher standard than Whirly.
I do not. I hold Whirly to a much higher standard than the shit-show presidents we've had because Whirly meant something magical to KMC for years. A certain mythical level of sock trolling the likes of which the internet may never experience ever again.
Originally posted by Jeffo
I agree with all of this and was hoping Robtard would come up with a reason as coherent as any of the above.Alas he failed.
Obviously the strongest point in that deck would be the decriminalisation of those much in demand substances. Of course, a wall couldn't hurt either imo in addition to these.
Nice. You seem reasonable.
I hope you're not another racist Ziggy type or a super woman-hating type. cry
Originally posted by Robtard
-Asylum seekers can only carry a limited amount of food and water, if they reach a part of Trump's great super wall and they're low on supplies, they could die by the time they go around. eg a child died while in [b]Trump's border patrol hands due to dehydration. They failed to give someone water.-Asylum seekers forced to try and go over the wall could slip and fall off and die. eg any of the various examples where people fell off of things and died
-Asylum seekers could be hit and killed by falling pieces of concrete because the project would largely go to Trump's concrete/construction buddies who will cut corners because they know no on will be looking. eg like when Halliburton overcharged the US taxpayers and Cheney sweep it under the rug
Any other silly questions, Surt? Might as well call it Trump's Wall of Murder at this point. [/B]
What?
Are you serious? This isn't serious, right? There is a proper process to seek Asylum in the US. And it's actually one of the only decent systems for getting into the country legally and quickly.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I do not. I hold Whirly to a much higher standard than the shit-show presidents we've had because Whirly meant something magical to KMC for years. A certain mythical level of sock trolling the likes of which the internet may never experience ever again.
I assume you mean to a much higher standard of trolling and not Presidential decorum?
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I saw a good quote:[b]"Why can't we just use thoughts and prayers to protect our borders? That's what we use to protect our schools."
[/B]
Protect the border
Originally posted by dadudemonI feel both ashamed and aroused at the moment. Thank you DDM that's perhaps the nicest back handed compliment anyone has ever given me.
I do not. I hold Whirly to a much higher standard than the shit-show presidents we've had because Whirly meant something magical to KMC for years. A certain mythical level of sock trolling the likes of which the internet may never experience ever again.
Originally posted by dadudemonAgain thank you, without wanting to urn this discussion into one about me, as I am shy and have no vanity or narcissism and always try and be humble, the truth is as your post alludes, I no longer have the troll class I had, my views are ingrained in my doterage and long debates and posts are no longer of interest, I pretty much know how people will react to troll posts and can't be bothered to sock anymore. I am a shadow of myself as a troll, but perhaps that's how it should be. I have been trolling since Netscape Navigator and my dial up connection and as with anything overtime the hunger for it is lost.
No, just high-standards in general. Whirly had troll-class.
Originally posted by BackFireCan you change the name of this thread so people stop getting confused?
The wall will essentially just be a $20+ billion symbol (the wall won't cost $5 billion) to the rest of the world, it has no practical use and will be ineffective at securing the border. It serves no function on its own, and is easily defeated by a $40 ladder, or other means. DDM has made various posts and provided a good deal of evidence as to why the wall won't be effective, showing how easy it will be for people to go over it or under it, thus, the only way it actually improves border security is if there is an increase in border agents to guard it, but an increase in border agents alone would also improve border security by probably the same amount. As such, I'd much rather money be spent on hiring more and better border agents, and supplying them with improved training, tech and tools to protect the border. The wall itself is pointless and stupid.Besides, wasn't Mexico supposed to pay for it?
Maybe "Trump's Great Wall Shutdown", or something along those lines.
Originally posted by dadudemonWhirly is still on KMC.
I do not. I hold Whirly to a much higher standard than the shit-show presidents we've had because Whirly meant something magical to KMC for years. A certain mythical level of sock trolling the likes of which the internet may never experience ever again.
@Putinbot1