Greater feat: Thor pulling the rings vs. Superman Pulling a ship

Started by h1a810 pages
Originally posted by Silent Master
Like I said, your whole argument is based on how things would work in real life. entertainment doesn't have to get everything perfect in order for it to count. that is what suspension of disbelief is all about.

Suspension of disbelief has nothing to do with anything here.
We suppose to be believed that Thor is being pulled when he actually is being pushed? Idiot you.

Again, entertainment doesn't have to get everything perfect in order for it to count. that is what suspension of disbelief is all about.

Is h1 still saying what the movie says doesn't matter, only what he says matters? Because we all know h1's opinion overrules what the movie directly states and shows. -sarcasm-

Originally posted by h1a8
Figurative language.
The full force can be measured by Thor's mass times his acceleration.

Figurative language.
Thor experienced heat, radiation, and a net push force.
The actual force (the push force) can be measured within a certain degree of accuracy.

movies are about entertaining us, you twit... when you go see a movie you are supposed to check your rain at the door and hopefully be entertained at what you just watched.. you must think aquaman actually exist, lmao. real life science/physics is not movie science/physics.. you should learn that, but you won't ever

Originally posted by KingD19
Is h1 still saying what the movie says doesn't matter, only what he says matters? Because we all know h1's opinion overrules what the movie directly states and shows. -sarcasm-

nah... he's just bringing some facts that should be applied to the feat. But you guys are doing well to sidestep it, just bcos it exposes a misconception/flaw in that feat; terming it "suspension of belief".
Meanwhile you fail to apply/disregard these factors to other characters&situations. smh.

Originally posted by KingD19
Is h1 still saying what the movie says doesn't matter, only what he says matters? Because we all know h1's opinion overrules what the movie directly states and shows. -sarcasm-

It's what he does, you'll notice that he only applies the RL argument when it helps his side.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, entertainment doesn't have to get everything perfect in order for it to count. that is what suspension of disbelief is all about.
Suspension of disbelief doesn't apply here. How can Thor experience gravity pull when he was pushed away? Clearly the writer didn't write any gravity force in the scene.
Thor stood on the platform of the star talking. No forces were acting.

The more you argue the point the dumber you appear.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's what he does, you'll notice that he only applies the RL argument when it helps his side.

RL physics has nothing to do with anything here.
You want to believe Thor was pulled when it was shown he was pushed. You are an idiot troll.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
movies are about entertaining us, you twit... when you go see a movie you are supposed to check your rain at the door and hopefully be entertained at what you just watched.. you must think aquaman actually exist, lmao. real life science/physics is not movie science/physics.. you should learn that, but you won't ever
And figurative language is still figurative language.

It has everything to do with it, your whole argument is based on how things would work in real life. entertainment doesn't have to get everything perfect in order for it to count. that is what suspension of disbelief is all about.

cool how were throwing the phrase "suspension of belief" about. B'when its supes the sub disapears.
S.M.H

Can you give some examples of where suspension of disbelief was thrown out for Superman feats?

The building carrying feat is quite a good example.

Wasn’t that explained as a parody of h1’s posting style? Or you talking about another post? Pls quote what you mean.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Wasn’t that explained as a parody of h1’s posting style? Or you talking about another post? Pls quote what you mean.

Inhuman claimed the building supes carried (effortlessly btw) must have been very light. saying that the point of contact wouldnt have allowed the building to remain intact.
so where was the s.o.b??
what did he base that on??

Why the ship feat? Why not the building carrying feat?

Originally posted by The Spectre+
Inhuman claimed the building supes carried (effortlessly btw) must have been very light. saying that the point of contact wouldnt have allowed the building to remain intact.
so where was the s.o.b??
what did he base that on??

He was making fun of h1’s posting style. It was a joke, a parody, a sham, a flimflam, a mockery.

Hope that clears things up.

😂 flimflam 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
😂 flimflam 😂

Only slightly less annoying than Scrappy.

Suspension of disbelief tells us that gravity isn’t affecting Thor.
We are shown Thor getting pushed away (not pulled).
We are shown Thor standing at the star talking with no forces acting on him. In other words, replace Thor with Superman and we would get the same result.

Also, Silent downplayed Superman's black hole feat by saying Lois wasn't harmed. Silent downplayed Superman's tectonic plate feat, suggesting that he used equipment to do it when clearly it was a reference to Reeve's Superman.

Back to the thread. The ring feat is unquantifiable. We have no idea how impressive it is.
Therefore the thread is invalid.