Originally posted by Josh_AlexanderIt was not just the arrow it was the placement and force it was fired. Rusted arrow plus the force>>Palp Fl.
Lightsaber>>>>> Rusted arrow.Vader wins this with a single blow...Except Smaug's death won't be that dramatic 😉
False. He failed to even defeat a weak Luke with a single blow. Dragon>>>>> human body.
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
It was not just the arrow it was the placement and force it was fired. Rusted arrow plus the force>>Palp Fl.False. He failed to even defeat a weak Luke with a single blow. Dragon>>>>> human body.
😂
oh cmon, it was obvious vader wasn't trying to kill luke in ESB and RotJ. give him some credit, will ya?
i know how you roll 😉
the combination of sentimental attachments vs his complete impracticality in this forum makes for top quality bait, especially since kylo/rey/snoke have far surpassed vader's or any force-user's power on screen (remember rey reverse-mind-raped kylo as a newbie so she's obviously of equal potential)
Originally posted by Bashar TegHave you seen either of the two fantastic beasts films? I know off topic but I have a feeling you might really like Grindelwald as a character.
i know how you roll 😉the combination of sentimental attachments vs his complete impracticality in this forum makes for top quality bait, especially since kylo/rey/snoke have far surpassed vader's or any force-user's power on screen (remember rey reverse-mind-raped kylo as a newbie so she's obviously of equal potential)
Originally posted by Bashar TegI doubt you will enjoy Voldemort who is my cup of tea. Grindelwald is pretty fantastic in his own right just not my sort of character that I gravitate towards. You see a Depp flesh out the character in Crimes of Grindelwald. Completely different modus operandi than dear old Tom (Voldemort).
never been much of a potter fan but i did see all the films and will check the others out when they become available at no extra cost to me
Ps. You do not need to see the Potter films since these are the prequels to the Potter franchise.
Found this online which will not ruin anything about the characters but briefly describes the differences between their approaches.
And both characters are right for their stories. There are many different types of villains; some want to destroy the world simply because they are bad, others have motivations that we can understand and even agree with. And it depends on the story as to which one it needs. A story like Lord of the Rings needs a villain who is just unstoppable evil, whereas a movie like Avengers: Infinity War requires someone like Thanos who makes sense, despite how vile his methods are.
Likewise, for Harry’s story, Voldemort was the required villain, because Harry needed to face someone who was undeniably evil. When Voldemort walked into a scene, we all held our breath. But with the Fantastic Beasts series, a more nuanced villain is called for. This is a more grown-up story we are experiencing now, and it calls for more gray areas. It calls for an antagonist who can be reasonable, and has the ability to sway even the best characters. We know- because of the books- that Grindelwald will go down as one of the darkest wizards of the age, and that he will be stopped. But now we get to see why he was regarded in that way, we get to see how he was dangerous, and learn how different he was from Voldemort.