Originally posted by Bashar Teg
your point is invalid because fee-fees; and this topic proves it, because reasons
His point is invalid because of logic not feelings. Logically the fact that men have molested young boys in bathrooms should have no impact on whether or not we make it easier for predators to have access to young girls.
I'm shocked that actually had to be pointed out, but there it is.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
You seem to actually be ideologically consistent on this issue.My problem really is the double think with some people who invest a lot of moral outrage and posturing into this issue but don't really take the logic to its conclusion.
I truthfully don't care much about the issue itself. Idgaf if all biological men or in my rest room, or everyone who identifies as a man, or everyone regardless of sex and gender identification.
This whole trans bathroom argument is weird to me. You understand that regardless of which bathroom they use, there might also be kids in there? Citing the safety of children as a reason to dictate which bathroom they use assumes that if they're going to molest a kid it has to be one of the opposite sex.
Very foolish assumption. Let me ask you something... Who is most likely to molest a little boy?Man or woman? A man by far is more likely to molest a boy than a woman. Therefore, little boys need to start using the women's room right? For their safety?
Originally posted by mike brown
This whole trans bathroom argument is weird to me. You understand that regardless of which bathroom they use, there might also be kids in there? Citing the safety of children as a reason to dictate which bathroom they use assumes that if they're going to molest a kid it has to be one of the opposite sex.Very foolish assumption. Let me ask you something... Who is most likely to molest a little boy?Man or woman? A man by far is more likely to molest a boy than a woman. Therefore, little boys need to start using the women's room right? For their safety?
Originally posted by Surtur
His point is invalid because of logic not feelings. Logically the fact that men have molested young boys in bathrooms should have no impact on whether or not we make it easier for predators to have access to young girls.I'm shocked that actually had to be pointed out, but there it is.
Originally posted by mike brown
But you're ignoring the fact that you are basically saying you'd rather the predators go after young boys than young girls. Why is that?
I'm not ignoring anything because it's not a fact lol. You just twisted my words. Why is that? Did you have so little an argument you had no other choice?
No. It is a reality. There are 2 bathrooms. By enforcing who goes in which one, you merely shift sexual predators from one bathroom to another. Both bathrooms have kids and potential victims. So why are you worried enough about little girls being molested by men to separate them from men but you aren't worried enough to do that for boys?
Originally posted by mike brown
No. It is a reality. There are 2 bathrooms. By enforcing who goes in which one, you merely shift sexual predators from one bathroom to another. Both bathrooms have kids and potential victims. So why are you worried enough about little girls being molested by men to separate them from men but you aren't worried enough to do that for boys?
No, it's not a reality. I'm saying because some victimization exists it doesn't mean we should make it easier for further victimization to take place. It has nothing to do with preferring one gender get victimized over the other.
Do better.
Originally posted by Surturmy point is thata bunch of people pretending that protecting the kids is their main priority is a joke. when in reality it seems more like they care more about persecuting a certain group.
His point is invalid because of logic not feelings. Logically the fact that men have molested young boys in bathrooms should have no impact on whether or not we make it easier for predators to have access to young girls.I'm shocked that actually had to be pointed out, but there it is.
But hey lets put the majority of our focus on the minority of kids that are less likely to be sexually assaulted by a smaller sub group rather than the majority of kids that are more likely to be sexually assaulted by a much larger grpup.
U guys can sell that "im doing it for the kids" B.S somewhere else. Im not buying it.
You're failing to address the point. What about it isn't a reality? You're worried predators will use the women's room to assualt little girls, thereby shifting the supposed threat to the men's room where there are little boys. That is you prioritizing girls over boys.
Why should we not have boys say ages 10 and younger use the women's room where they will be safer and let the adolescent and grown men and trans people use the men's room. Wouldn't that be safer for everyone?
Originally posted by Raptor22
my point is thata bunch of people pretending that protecting the kids is their main priority is a joke. when in reality it seems more like they care more about persecuting a certain group.But hey lets put the majority of our focus on the minority of kids that are less likely to be sexually assaulted by a smaller sub group rather than the majority of kids that are more likely to be sexually assaulted by a much larger grpup.
U guys can sell that "im doing it for the kids" B.S somewhere else. Im not buying it.
Trans people have been using the other side's bathrooms for as long as there have been trans people. it being such a public issue now is just because some people want to signal how woke and better than other people they are.
Originally posted by Raptor22
my point is thata bunch of people pretending that protecting the kids is their main priority is a joke. when in reality it seems more like they care more about persecuting a certain group.But hey lets put the majority of our focus on the minority of kids that are less likely to be sexually assaulted by a smaller sub group rather than the majority of kids that are more likely to be sexually assaulted by a much larger grpup.
U guys can sell that "im doing it for the kids" B.S somewhere else. Im not buying it.
I do not recall anyone here claiming they are against transgenders in the ladies room solely because of the threat to children, so I'll assume you're speaking in general. Which is fine. However, the example you used wasn't a good one. It's easier to keep men out of the ladies room than it is to keep men out of the men's room. That is just the way it is.
It doesn't mean people don't care if a boy gets molested in the men's room.
Originally posted by Flyattractorno hypocrisy smells like
[b]JAnd that Kids is what Hypocrisy Smells Like! [/B]
Person A- Black lives matter
Person B- why r u only focussing on black lives? All lives matter
Person A- yes all lives matter but were trying to focus on this 1 specific problem.
Person B- nope. Its either all or nothing
Person B- girls rooms need to be protected
Person A- why r u only focussing on girls rooms? Dont all bathrooms matter? I thought it was all or nothing.
Person B- yes they all matter but im trying to focus on this one specific probl... Oh wait i see what u did.
Originally posted by Raptor22
no hypocrisy smells likePerson A- Black lives matter
Person B- why r u only focussing on black lives? All lives matter
Person A- yes all lives matter but were trying to focus on this 1 specific problem.
Person B- nope. Its either all or nothing
Person B- girls rooms need to be protected
Person A- why r u only focussing on girls rooms? Dont all bathrooms matter? I thought it was all or nothing.
Person B- yes they all matter but im trying to focus on this one specific probl... Oh wait i see what u did.
Actually people are focusing on not making a problem even worse.
I know the left says it loves equality, but "men have an easier time of molesting boys in the bathroom so we need to make it easier for girls to get molested too" is not the way to go bro.
Originally posted by Silent Masterso if its been happening for so long then why do people have a problem with it now? Is it because Its being officially accepted? Was it ok before as long as we didnt talk about it?
Trans people have been using the other side's bathrooms for as long as there have been trans people. it being such a public issue now is just because some people want to signal how woke and better than other people they are.
Should we not officially accept gay marriage because gay dudes have already been living with eachother as long as there have been gay dudes?
Originally posted by MythLord
Ah I see... Several instances of schools getting shot up and "B-but muh guns! We can't ban muh guns!"
One instance of a child assaulted by a Trans person and suddenly we shouldn't allow them to use their preferred bathrooms?Either way, this woman should obviously be charged with assault and jailed.
^Bingo
Blanket-blame here, but not there. Selective blanketing from these bozos.