Why I've Been Redpilled

Started by Robtard20 pages

So SW Legend is still a legit gay hater. Figured he would have grown out of that by now, it's 2019.

**** lol. I've been waiting for the "because it's [the current year]" to be used with 2019.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
**** lol. I've been waiting for the "because it's [the current year]" to be used with 2019.

Lmao

Originally posted by Emperordmb
**** lol. I've been waiting for the "because it's [the current year]" to be used with 2019.

You're welcome.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You really think I cosigned "bigotry" by agreeing that Democrats are full of hypocritical white people trying to virtue signal?

Hit a nerve? 🙂

Lol missed this, hilarious.

What kind of a muppet uses the word "gayism" seriously?

Especially in 2019.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Cosigning bigotry is so edgy.

As edgy as calling the truth "bigotry"?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
**** lol. I've been waiting for the "because it's [the current year]" to be used with 2019.

I was the first human alive to virtue signal with "2019" on January 3rd, in the elevator, when a coworker made a double entendre about possibly having a gay escapade during New Years and I said, "Hey, it's 2019, no judgments from me, man."

Please join me in patting me on my back.

DDM always trying to steal Robtard's thunder, but no, he can't have it

Originally posted by Robtard
DDM always trying to steal Robtard's thunder, but no, he can't have it

If you have time to post this, you have time to join Emperordmb in patting me on the back for being the first to virtue signal with the "it's 2019" phrase.

Thank you advance for the back pats.

Re: Re: Why I've Been Redpilled

Originally posted by SamZED
What is your stance on abortion?

I'm pro-rights, pro-contraceptive, and pro-STEM cell research. Ultimately, I am pro-premarital sex, but anti-premarital-pregnancy

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Hmm. I believe [B]polygyny is the correct word. [/B]

It's ultimately polygamy, which in any form is wrong.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
And what about your notion of morality? Having sex with women outside wedlock to figure out who is good at satiating your lusts?

LOL! You're talking about lust while supporting polygyny. Again, L.O.L!

Having kids with women outside wedlock?

Actually I'm against pre-marital pregnancy

Muhammad (PBUH) did not create a harem; he "married" women to advance his goals (promotion of Islam). This arrangement is much better than having an harem. This arrangement would also ensure 'political connections' in an environment when UN did not exist and the world wasn't filled with nation-states.

😆

So Muhammad had to phuck women to spread his religion? Funny how Jesus, Buddha, and Lao Tzi didn't have to do that. They were just enlightened prophets who spoke metaphysical wisdom, and those with open ears flocked to their message. Maybe Muhammad AKA Middle-Eastern David Koresh, didn't have a strong enough message

Secondly, SOCIETAL LAWS prevent men from having multiple wives in modern times; many in the West can have a single wife at a time NOT BY CHOICE but due to SOCIETAL LAWS. Push for legalization of polygyny in your country and many will be interested.

😆

"MUH MORAL RELATIVIZM!" Polygamy is objectively wrong

LOL - I suppose you have compelling scientific evidence on your side to support this rubbish.

You mean besides the fact that there are no Muslim-majority countries with a Human Rights Index ranking above 55%?

Thanks for your concern.

Political biases already? Do you believe that Israeli-Palestinian conflict is about Islam? Like seriously? This conflict is about REGIONAL IDENTITY and the defunct British Empire is "responsible." Palestinians have no problem with Jews at personal capacity but they believe that the state of Israel is a POLITICAL ENTITY IMPOSED ON THEIR LANDS by the "Imperialists." And majority of Israeli citizens are not natives but imports from Europe (migrations).

So a bunch of ethnocentric bullshit that does nothing to progress the rights or increase the productivity of the citizens in the region. Okay then. Like I said, Go Israel!

You are also demonstrating ethnocentrism in this matter - something you complain about in your post at a later stage. Be glad that you do not live in Palestine OR rather what is left of it, or your views would have been really different.

LOL! You're talking about me being ethnocentric after you just went on that entire schpeel about the British Empire? I am glad that I didn't grow up in Palestine, because it's a hellhole run by crazy ethnocentrists. Maybe if the Palestinians didn't care so much about "their land" and cared more about "their species", then they would realize that territorial bragging rights are irrelevant to mankind's evolution.

So you support this SOCIAL DEGENERATION but you have a problem with polygyny? NEAT.

LGBTQ filth is the greatest threat to societal values that have shaped notable civilizations over time, and homosexuality is NOT HEALTHY way of life. FYI: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html

Just wait for pro-pedophilia to gain momentum followed by pro-incest movement. Enlightening discussion here: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f75/t650646.html

In fact, pro-bestiality movement will be the endgame or worse. SOCIAL DEGENERATION have no limits, my naive friend.

😆 the typical homophobic argument. I made myself very clear that I view ONLY homosexuality as involuntary, and that I will only accept androgyny as an adult choice. It's funny how you talk about homosexuality being the gateway to social degeneration when you support men having a rotation of sex-slave wives and tribalist ethnocentrism that leads to unnecessary warfare with a far more advanced and secular society.

Congratulations for realizing political hypocrisy of Democrats. However, who is responsible for Democrats having so much power and sway? WHITE PEOPLE.

Because white people seem to be the only ones ho realize that they are not WHITE people, but rather white PEOPLE.

Nothing wrong with being homophobic - gayism is disgusting behavior.

Homophobia is the same as racism, xenophobic intolerance of another individual for an involuntary trait they possess that doesn't affect the xenophobic individual in the slightest.

You are guilty of ethnocentrism (see above).

Nope. I am a pro-anthropocentrist, anti-ethnocentrist kind of guy, even though I do support Western culture because it's innate secularism means that it leans more to the "anthropo", rather than "ethno" side

Misogyny and Misandry - both major problems.

And yet you support polygyny, which promotes both misogyny and misandry.

Nevertheless, I will not paint all Democrats with the same brush. Many are wise and decent people, but do not perceive the Republicans as being saviors of the country. Republicans should stop being hypocrites themselves.

I don't. Trump being buddy buddy with the Wahhabist Saudis is proof enough that the Republicans won't be enough to stop the ethnocentric anti-humanist scourge that plagues our world.

Some good ideas in the remainder of your post by the way - credit where due.

All of my ideas are good. You are just not enlightened enough to see it yet.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I was the first human alive to virtue signal with "2019" on January 3rd, in the elevator, when a coworker made a double entendre about possibly having a gay escapade during New Years and I said, "Hey, it's 2019, no judgments from me, man."

Please join me in patting me on my back.

Bro it's 2019, posts like this are in bad taste.

Re: Why I've Been Redpilled

Originally posted by Lestov16
It has been a long while since I've posted on here, and when I did, I was a massive leftist and Democrat supporter. In the past year and a half though, my political views have shifted massively, and I think that I may find myself closer to conservative ideology than liberal. I still do hold liberal views, but they have either become more centrist, or are outnumbered by my conservative stances. I am still unsure whether I will vote Republican or third party in 2020, but I'm near certain that I won't be voting Democrat. Here are some of my new political views, as well as some of the circumstances that led to them:

-Up until 2016, I used to vote Democrat. However, after the Wikileaks hack revealed that
A) Hillary set up Trump to be her "pied piper candidate"
B) Hillary and Obama's involvement in James' Alefantis' pedophile ring
I could no longer in good conscience vote Democrat. As I was not a Trump supporter, I voted for Jill Stein in 2016. I do not support all of Stein's views, and frankly I view her as an environmentalist hippie, but she matched my views moreso than Gary Johnson, and was not nearly as scummy as Hlllary, so for me, Stein seemed like a good choice

-I no longer support Islam, to the point where I can say that I am a proud Islamophobe. I view Islam, Mormonism, Rastafarianism, Branch Davidianism, and any other Abrahamic Post-Christian-Prophet religion with the same kind of scorn. I think it's ridiculous that God would go from such a virtuous man as Jesus to lustful polygamists like Muhammad, Joseph Smith, and David Koresh. I think that unlike Judaism and Christianity, Islam is an excessively dogmatic and theocratic cult whose extremists will ALWAYS outnumber it's moderates, and as such, it is a dangerous ideology that is obstructing the progression of our species. Because of this, I support the efforts of Trump and European countries that are trying to rid their nations of Islamic influence, and I feel bad for nations like Canada and the UK where criticism of Islam is illegal, allowing the ideology to spread. Note that I do not feel that all Muslims are extremists, but I do feel that moderate Muslims are deluding themselves and should probably convert either to Abrahamic religions (i.e. Judaism or Christianity) or Daoist religions (such as Buddhism or Taoism).

-Because I no longer support Islam, I am 100% pro-Israel, and I support all efforts of the Israelis in their fight against the Palestinians. I am not pro-Zionist and do not support ethnostates, but I am pro-secularism, and Israel is easily the most secular country in the Middle East, being one of the few if only countries where homosexuality and/or women's rights aren't outright illegal. I understand that Israel perpetrates a lot of collateral damage in it's war against Hamas, but as far as I know, every war has collateral damage. The main thing I'm focused on are the goals of the combatants. Israel is clearly trying to achieve a secular state whereas Hamas clearly wants to install a Shia sharia law dictatorship. As such, I feel that being pro-Israel is the only logical choice for me.

-When It comes to LGBTQWXYZ rights, my views are very centrist. I do believe that homosexuality is an innate involuntary trait, and as such I absolutely believe in the legality, marriage, and adoption rights of gay people. With "Transgender" people, however, my views are not so cut and dry. I do support Androgyny, but ONLY as a voluntary form of body art essentially equivalent to tattoos, and as such, deserving of the same rules of those with tattoos, i.e. being that ONLY adults should be allowed to partake in the practice, and those who do should not be allowed in the military (although I have nothing against transgender police officers). I think that "non-binary gender fluidity" is ridiculous bunk science on the same level of Creationism, and I think that indoctrinating children (such as Desmond Napoles) into transgenderism is as disgusting as forcing gay children to get conversion therapies. I also do not believe that the state should pay for transgender hormone treatments and surgeries, because, as I stated, transgenderism is a choice and not a necessity. If any child or adult DOES feel that transgenderism is a necessity, especially to the point of harming themselves, then at that point, it is no longer voluntary androgyny but rather the mental insanity of gender dysphoria, which requires medical treatment rather than delusion-cuddling. Also, when it comes to transgender bathrooms, I think that if an androgynous person has acceptable enough hormone treatments/ surgeries, then they can enter the bathroom of their assumed gender. If they are just an androgynous crossdresser though, they have to use the bathroom they were born to use.

-I find myself in disgust with not only Black Lives Matter, but all Afrocentric platforms in our society (BET, TV ONE, Ebony Magazine, etc.). IMO, the main problem with African Americans is that they view their skin color as overriding their nationality as well as their overall humanity. Black people need to realize that regardless of their skin pigmentation, they are American citizens and as such must integrate themselves into American culture if they want to be viewed as equal. Black people have taken too much joy in segregating their culture, whether it is not allowing Caucasians to say the n-word, or even attacking Caucasians for "wearing black hairstyles" (i.e. Bonita Tindle). Black people's self-segregation and ethnocentrism not only dissuades white people from viewing them equally, but in fact emboldens white supremacists who view their own desires for ethnocentric segregation as justified. Black people have also taken too much enjoy in embracing the "taboo counter-culture" of American society, proudly boasting about materialism, misogyny, violence, and crime as though it is cool, not realizing that their embrace of gang culture makes them seem more like African warlords than American citizens. It's hilarious how liberals, the party of racial equality, LGBT and womens rights, support blacks and Muslims, who are unabashedly ethnocentrism, misogynistic, and homophobic, yet criticize conservatives for being those same things. In addition to all of this, we have the recent wave of fake hate crimes, most notably Pussie Smaggot, as well as the ethnic cleansing of white people out of various African countries. At this point, black people, rather than ending oppression, are merely taking the place of the oppressors, and evolving (or devolving) into the exact stereotypes that led white people to oppress them to begin with.

-When it comes to welfare and universal healthcare, I do believe it is necessary, but only for those who absolutely require it, i.e juvenile and senile citizens, and those with physical/mental disabilities (including wounded/PTSD-inflicted veterans). Able-bodied, mentally sound adults do not need to be given welfare/healthcare for free. I would suggest an UBI and universal healthcare for tax paying citizens as well as the above aforementioned groups, but under no circumstances do I support a welfare state where NEETs get to be unproductive and lazy and still live comfortably.

-When it comes to illegal immigration, I think that this is the most muddled topic for me. On one hand, I do not think that well meaning immigrants should be excluded from our country due to the overtly long bureaucratic system of gaining citizenship. On the other hand, our country shouldn't be The Repository of Failed Nations, especially when many of those nations have had opportunities to repair themselves. As far as violent illegal immigrants and MS-13 goes, I think that illegal immigrants caught doing violent crimes should be subject to military tribunal and execution as domestic terrorist insurgents threatening the American Heartland (I actually think this should apply not just to MS-13, but US based gangs such as the Crips and Bloods as well)

-Speaking of gang members, I have some ideas of how to repair the prison system. Mainly legalize marijuana and psychedlics, release everyone ever arrested for drug possession with intent to use, and place them in treatment programs. Petty thieves and other misdemeanor crimes should be punished with probation, community service, and/or a fine, and repeat misdemeanor offenders should be sentenced to one year in a rehab facility. As far as felony crimes, i.e. rape/pedophilia, robbery, murder, domestic abuse, hate crimes, narcotics/arms/human trafficking, etc. ( and any proven false accusations of these crimes), I think that they, as stated above, should be charged as domestic terrorists and executed by the military. No last meal except for a spam sandwich, march em to the chair, but a bullet to the back of their head, cremate them, and flush their ashes down the toilet. We could essentially wipe out the need for prisons and induce fear into potential felons through threat of death.

These are just some of my new viewpoints. Some are liberal and some are conservative, but they are vastly different from what I used to believe. Make of them what you will.

I agree with a lot of this and I applaud your decision in removing yourself from the populist koolaid pushed by Mass Media and leftist ideology.

As I get older, better educated, learn more of history, biology and take more control of my life through self-improvement (A core tenant of red pill), the more harmful the leftist ideology is imo. It’s grown into this cancerous version focusing on victimhood and emotional driven movement. I think I’m harder on them than the right because I always expected better and I’m irritated at myself for not thoroughly researching all the major talking points to come to educated conclusions in my late teens.

Kudos on all this. 👆

Originally posted by Lestov16
Yes, because white people are the ones preventing black people from going to a library (or you know, the internet), learning a skill, and using that skill to be a productive member of society. Clearly, white people are censoring black people's education. It's all white people's fault that black people would rather sell drugs and lustfully phuck big booty bytches (thus increasing pregnancy rates amongst households that cant afford children, leading to said children being raised with poor parenting, and thus ensuring said children become violent thugs) than actually learn a trade and treat women respectfully.

It's white people who tell black people that "snitches get stitches", thus ensuring that black people become ghetto warlords who are essentially insurgents trying to override the US legal system with their "G-Code", which in turn ensures that the police officers in those areas treat them with much less respect than normal law-abiding US citizens.

It's white people who tell ethnocentric African Americans to refer to themselves as "African American", or "Black", or "Moorish", or "Melanated", or any other phrase that prioritizes skin color over the fact that, at the end of the day, we are all equally American citizens

It's all white people's fault. Black people dindu nuffin. They're good boys.

👆

I don’t care that your great grandfather was a slave. Get your ass up, get a job, and get educated. All these Athrocentric movements spend more time blaming white people than helping black people.

I’m not saying it’s easy, it’s hard. It’s meant to be hard. And it’s not unfair that the rich White kid who’s never had to work to get ahead in life will have it much easier. Because when you eventually get your foot in the door, you’ll f*cking smoke them. Nothing can overcome the work ethic you develop. I’m so grateful for not being a 4th generation trust fund kid. These poor bastards have poor work ethic, have shitty mental health, terrible addictions and a poor mind/body/soul harmony. This is purely ancentonal, but it seems like the older the money, the worse the kid is. Human beings are evolved to thrive through challenge and suffering.

The worst type of racism exists in the highest of upper echelons in society but that can only change when enough wealth has been accumulated by multicultural people that they no longer

Re: Re: Re: Why I've Been Redpilled

Originally posted by Lestov16
It's ultimately polygamy, which in any form is wrong.
Why?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Cosigning bigotry is so edgy.

You’re an idiot!

It’s not co-signing bigotry when it’s been proven that the Democratic Party have been using minorities for voters, and turning their on them when they are no longer useful.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Why I've Been Redpilled

Originally posted by NemeBro
Why?

Polygamy is ultimately organized infidelity, which I believe creates negative relationship dynamics and devalues the spouses of the polygamous individual. I think that there are 2 kinds of sexual relationships: Erotic (aka flirtatious) and Romantic (aka fidelity). People can engage in any kind of erotic relationship they want, but when it comes to raising children, people must be responsible enough to put aside their lust and find a single romantic partner whom they are both attracted to one a physical level and emotionally trust to raise a child, securing that emotional trust through marraige. If somebody is emotionally trusting and sexually attracted to an individual, but said individual is attracted to other people, said somebody needs to friendzone said individual, and be emotionally mature enough to accept the lack of mutual physical attraction. If any individual is merely sexually attracted to a single person who doesn't wish to share that mutual connection and wishes to either phuck other people alongside or besides said individual, then said individual is an emotionally immature follower and/or stalker who needs to amplify their self-respect.

Also, as part of being against polygamy, I'm also baffled by the cuckold fetish, which seems to comprise of insecure pussy-whipped men who don't know how to pleasure a woman or how to friendzone their partner to find a woman they can pleasure.

Originally posted by SquallX
You’re an idiot!

It’s not co-signing bigotry when it’s been proven that the Democratic Party have been using minorities for voters, and turning their on them when they are no longer useful.

Qualify your statements and substantiate your claims.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Qualify your statements and substantiate your claims.

Stop playing the fool. It’s been proven multiple times that Democrats talks down to Blacks because they think their not smart enough to understand them, while at the same time talk normally when addressing Whites.

It’s also proven, when election comes around, Democrats makes the Black communities multiple promises, and once their elected, they turn around and leave the Black communities high and dry. Only to come around next election and repeat the promise.

It’s also proven facts, that most Democrats run cities are proportionally poorer than most Republicans run cities when it concerns Balcks.

Acting like a dumbass doesn’t change those facts. Democrats actually thinks Blacks are morons. Atleast most Republicans gives Blacks a chance to stand on their own feet.