Originally posted by TempAccount
What makes them more qualified? Because they're lawyers and career politicians? This is actually what the founding fathers didn't want.The people serving in government were meant to be successful entrepreneurs and professionals who understood how the world work; not those looking to suck-up to lobbyists in order to line their pockets.
Because they all have some government experience 👆
People already ass-blasted you on this, so I'll let you recoup.
Originally posted by dadudemon
But the extreme overwhelming majority are and if you have to appeal to the very small exception to make your point, you've missed the point.Also, here's how your business sense works in the real world:
"I should invest is this great idea because I have money I was born into to invest. I have a team of highly qualified people who can run the company and act as advisers. I will not fail because my money gives me every advantage to make this investment successful."
FYI, I've been on the receiving side of these wealthy investors. They are often morons and highly ignorant. But they have enough money to hire very talented people.
👆
The ability to sniff out and hire talent that does exceptional work and makes you richer is key to being a wealthy investor.
Originally posted by Robtard
The ability to sniff out and hire talent that does exceptional work and makes you richer is key to being a wealthy investor.
No, you hire people to hire people. lol
That's called HR. You can also hire big name recurting comapnies to do this work for you, too.
Meaning, all you need is money to be successful. And a willingness to listen to your talented employees at least 20% of the time.
Just look at Trump: still very successful, is a complete moron, but listens to his people often enough not to fail horribly.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No, you hire people to hire people. lolThat's called HR. You can also hire big name recurting comapnies to do this work for you, too.
Meaning, all you need is money to be successful. And a willingness to listen to your talented employees at least 20% of the time.
Just look at Trump: still very successful, is a complete moron, but listens to his people often enough not to fail horribly.
You're making a distinction without difference to what I said. If you hire someone competent that then hires other competent people, that's still steaming from you.
Originally posted by Robtard
You're making a distinction without difference to what I said. If you hire someone competent that then hires other competent people, that's still steaming from you.
Pay attention to these steps to understand how rich, dumb, people make money and why you are wrong:
1. Google search "recruiting companies".
2. Look at glassdoor reviews for the ones you find from 1.
3. Select a local one that has very high ratings.
4. Call them, tell them you need someone to help you invest your money.
5. The recruiting company tells you to sign documents and walks you through literally every single step. Including how to pay them.
6. They find someone. You talk to them, they seem like they are smart, the recruiting company says they have a stellar resume, had great references, and are a perfect fit.
7. You hire them. The recruiting company takes care of all the HR stuff including paying the person. You just have to let all that paperwork you signed take care of all the business. All of it.
8. Your investment adviser puts together several investment portfolios for you. Presents the prospects. And you select the one you like the most just because it sounds cool. But you're literally too dumb to understand any of it.
9. Bam, you get an ROI after 2 years because your adviser was good at their job. Oh, and your employee base expands and your adviser becomes your COO.
How much of this gets credited to the person born into the money? Here's what the rich person had to do: know how to read and know how to use the internet decently enough to understand reviews.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Pay attention to these steps to understand how rich, dumb, people make money and why you are wrong:1. Google search "recruiting companies".
2. Look at glassdoor reviews for the ones you find from 1.
3. Select a local one that has very high ratings.
4. Call them, tell them you need someone to help you invest your money.
Stopped there. That's the same as you hiring competent people (that hire more competent people) to make you money and that's a skill to success as an investor.
We're saying the same thing from the start, essentially. Distinction without Difference.
Originally posted by Robtard
Stopped there. That's the same as you hiring competent people (that hire more competent people) to make you money and that's a skill to success as an investor.We're saying the same thing from the start, essentially. Distinction without Difference.
But we aren't saying the same thing at all, you know it, and it's odd that you're taking the side of rich morons like Trump over me who is pointing out the problem of why the "free market" isn't actually free.
I don't think we're arguing that at all? Least I wasn't arguing about the "free market".
Side note: Trump is both rich and a moron, but to argue he's not capable of hiring talent at times is faulty, as he certainly is. He does have trouble keeping that talent though, due to being a horrible manager.
Anyhow, we'll just have to agree to disagree I guess.
Originally posted by P-Geyser
I skipped the debate. Though what I can say, is that Bill DeBlasio or as I call him, Bill DeBla$$hole is a total Stooge and a clown. He is one of the worst Mayor's we have had here in NYC.
There were hilarious parts, like not one but *two* democrats randomly speaking in spanish lol.
Oh and they seemed to spend more time discussing how they'd help illegals than they did discussing how they'd help Americans.
While I find it silly, just speak English as that's America's common tongue. It's funny seeing Trumpers criticize other politicians for doing it when Trump has done it many a time and the whole Trumper bus cheered.
Then again, Trump attacked Bush for speaking Spanish during the debates adn then did it himself later, so it's no real surprise.
Originally posted by Robtard
While I find it silly, just speak English as that's America's common tongue. It's funny seeing Trumpers criticize other politicians for doing it when Trump has done it many a time and the whole Trumper bus cheered.Then again, Trump attacked Bush for speaking Spanish during the debates adn then did it himself later, so it's no real surprise.
I certainly don't recall ever cheering him on for speaking spanish.
Originally posted by RobtardI can't remember a presidential debate that had so much Spanish spoken... And Castro, the one Spanish person on stage wasn't the one speaking the most Spanish.
While I find it silly, just speak English as that's America's common tongue. It's funny seeing Trumpers criticize other politicians for doing it when Trump has done it many a time and the whole Trumper bus cheered.Then again, Trump attacked Bush for speaking Spanish during the debates adn then did it himself later, so it's no real surprise.
And of course the debate was in Miami and started off with the candidates competing over who loves immigrants more. Please pander harder, guys.
Originally posted by mike brown
I can't remember a presidential debate that had so much Spanish spoken... And Castro, the one Spanish person on stage wasn't the one speaking the most Spanish.And of course the debate was in Miami and started off with the candidates competing over who loves immigrants more. Please pander harder, guys.
That's a whole lotta cringe...
Originally posted by Surtur
There were hilarious parts, like not one but *two* democrats randomly speaking in spanish lol.Oh and they seemed to spend more time discussing how they'd help illegals than they did discussing how they'd help Americans.
Yeah, I saw that in clips on FOX news (I'd never actually force myself to watch that retarded clown show especially w/crazy conspiracy theorist Madcow as one of mods). What a disgusting display. One good thing I heard from the clips I saw/heard though, was that certain candidates believe that men (transgendered women) are entitled just as much to free abortions as women are lol. Yep, that's the "party of science" alright. 😂
Democrats: the party of infanticide, anti-self-defense, wide-open borders, criminal aliens, socialism... and... "science." 😆
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think we're arguing that at all? Least I wasn't arguing about the "free market".
We were because you disagreed with me and made this point:
Originally posted by Robtard
The ability to sniff out and hire talent that does exceptional work and makes you richer is key to being a wealthy investor.
So I explained how corporate headhunters work to you.
But you don't need me to recap our convo at all. You know all this. You're just bored.
Originally posted by Robtard
Side note: Trump is both rich and a moron, but to argue he's not capable of hiring talent at times is faulty, as he certainly is. He does have trouble keeping that talent though, due to being a horrible manager.Anyhow, we'll just have to agree to disagree I guess.
Oh yeah? And how does Trump get directed to this talent? Does he find them and "sniff them out" to see if they are talented?
Or does he have headhunters and advisers doing that for him?
It's as if you're completely ignorant of how all this stuff works but you and I both know you're not.