I feel that you are seeking to push the debate towards an argument I never made.
First, you are insisting that I take a person position on the matter. Thing is, my position (and yours as well) is from a position of ignorance. We are just not equiped to make completely informed decisions on this. What do I feel is my opinion from an uninformed position? My opinion is that I need to see more information to make as informed a decision as I can. Personally, I have no position I’d like to take just as of now.
Secondly, the intention of my statement wasn’t to determine if the motivations behind the actual decision to ban transgenders itself (by the administration) was transphobic or not. Again, I am not psychic so I wouldn’t know. I was stating if the idea itself of having a selectiveness geared towards transgenders within the military has a foundation of logic. Granted, admittedly, the way I stated my sentence IS a bit misleading (it should have wrote “if selectivity is based purely on prejudice...” NOT “if THE selectiveness is based solely on prejudice”) and may have understandably confused you so I will admit that fault (I was kinda replying with under 2 hours of sleep and a hangover at the time). But if you view my sequence of responses, it would be obvious that this was my intention from the very beginning.