Thor vs. Captain Marvel

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
No, am just listing what the movie hinted at.

In this case, the movies hint at Captain Marvel having a bigger exposure to space. As simple as that.

Thor was seen briefly on space, and if we are talking about [B]assuming things then we can assume that Thor's unconciousness was product of his long exposure to the void.

In this case, I am being objective by saying that Thor's resistance to the void is questionable (There are feats that question his resistance to space).

It's called objectiveness, something you've always lacked when Thor is concerned. [/B]

So your proof of your objectivity is claiming that Thor got knocked out due to his exposure to space and not due to the power gem explosion that completely demolished his ship?

Hah! With a claim as ridiculous as that I guess there's really no point in wasting anymore of my time on you.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So your proof of your objectivity is claiming that Thor got knocked out due to his exposure to space and not due to the power gem explosion that completely demolished his ship?

Hah! With a claim as ridiculous as that I guess there's really no point in wasting anymore of my time on you.

Do you have evidence to claim that Space had no baring in Thor's condition? And do not bring the Nidavellir feat, in where Thor was briefly exposed to space.

Again, it's called being objective. I never said Thor has no resistance to space, I said that there is a feat which makes his resistance to space questionable. Carol in her binary form has no such feat.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So your proof of your objectivity is claiming that Thor got knocked out due to his exposure to space and not due to the power gem explosion that completely demolished his ship?

Hah! With a claim as ridiculous as that I guess there's really no point in wasting anymore of my time on you.

He and quan have a good bit in common.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He and quan have a good bit in common.

Just because we have similar opinions in a thread doesn't mean we have something in common.

Not like you, Froth and Darth at least.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Just because we have similar opinions in a thread doesn't mean we have something in common.

Not like you, Froth and Darth at least.

A "no you" response, how typical.

Originally posted by Silent Master
A "no you" response, how typical.

Cheerleading for Froth, how typical. 😂

Now, accusations of being a cheerleader. how original.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Now, accusations of being a cheerleader. how original.

You've always cheerleader for Froth, it's nothing new.

Doubling down on the cheerleader tactic, Zzzzzzzzzzzz.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
[B] Do you have evidence to claim that Space had no baring in Thor's condition? And do not bring the Nidavellir feat, in where Thor was briefly exposed to space.

Again, it's called being objective. I never said Thor has no resistance to space, I said that there is a feat which makes his resistance to space questionable. Carol in her binary form has no such feat. [/B]

So you want to disregard the Nidavellir feat, the feat where Thor was specifically shown to easily survive in space, because you claim it is too brief despite it probably being longer than any outerspace scene of CM?

Yeah, you're not applying any double standards at all. /Sarcasm

You've clearly lost this debate, so just give it up. The rational person would simply conclude that both Thor and CM are equally invulnerable to outer space till proven otherwise.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So you want to disregard the Nidavellir feat, the feat where Thor was specifically shown to easily survive in space, because you claim it is too brief despite it probably being longer than any outerspace scene of CM?

Yeah, you're not applying any double standards at all. /Sarcasm

You've clearly lost this debate, so just give it up. The rational person would simply conclude that both Thor and CM are equally invulnerable to outer space till proven otherwise.

Carol: Nothing to trump her immunity to space whilst in her binary form.

Thor: He was discovered unconciously floating through space by the GOTG. He has no feat where he is shown being exposed to space for a prolongued period of time.

Conclusion: Thor's immunity to space is QUESTIONABLE (we have a feat that makes it questionable) whilst Carol's doesn't.

The only one who has lost here is you my friend.

Again, it's called being objective, you should try it some time.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
He has no feat where he is shown being exposed to space for a [B] prolongued period of time.

[/B]

You mean, other than those scenes where Thor was in space for longer periods of time than any scene Captain Marvel was in outerspace? Those scenes?

Originally posted by Silent Master
He and quan have a good bit in common.

At this point he reminds me more of h1. Except instead of arguing about visual speed and implied speed he's arguing about visual space exposure vs. implied space exposure.

He's applying implied exposure for CM while applying visual exposure for Thor.

Originally posted by FrothByte

He's applying implied exposure for CM while applying visual exposure for Thor.

Exactly, and do you know why that's valid?

Because CM has no feat to make the assumption questionable. Whilst Thor has.

In other words, there is no reason to believe that CM is vulnerable to space, whereas Thor floating motionless through space, and the fact that he has no feat of prolongued exposure to such space, makes his resistance to the void QUESTIONABLE

We have no visual feat to trump Carol's immunity to space, where we do have one for Thor.

Sorry boy, google the world "objectiveness" one of these days.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Exactly, and do you know why that's valid?

Because CM has no feat to make the assumption [B]questionable. Whilst Thor has.

In other words, there is no reason to believe that CM is vulnerable to space, whereas Thor floating motionless through space, and the fact that he has no feat of prolongued exposure to such space, makes his resistance to the void QUESTIONABLE

We have no visual feat to trump Carol's immunity to space, where we do have one for Thor.

Sorry boy, google the world "objectiveness" one of these days. [/B]

And there you are again, claiming that Thor got knocked out from his exposure in space instead of the explosion caused by the power gem. Then you have the audacity to claim you're being objective. Lol.

Then you keep dodging my point that Thor actually spent more time in space as per feats than Carol did. Why do you refuse to address this?

You know what, if you want to make a complete fool of yourself, go for it. Don't say I didn't warn you.

Originally posted by FrothByte
And there you are again, claiming that Thor got knocked out from his exposure in space instead of the explosion caused by the power gem. Then you have the audacity to claim you're being objective. Lol.

Then you keep dodging my point that Thor actually spent more time in space as per feats than Carol did. Why do you refuse to address this?

You know what, if you want to make a complete fool of yourself, go for it. Don't say I didn't warn you.

If i were claiming that Thor got knocked by his exposure to the void, I would have said that Thor is vulnerable to space instead of saying that his immunity to space is questionable.

Again, we don't know exactly what caused Thor to go unconcious. Reason why, his immunity to the void is questionable (either side could be correct)

Objectiveness isn't a hard word

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
If i were claiming that Thor got knocked by his exposure to the void, I would have said that Thor is [B] vulnerable to space instead of saying that his immunity to space is questionable.

Again, we don't know exactly what caused Thor to go unconcious. Reason why, his immunity to the void is questionable (either side could be correct)

Objectiveness isn't a hard word [/B]

And there you go again, dodging the point that Thor actually spent more time in space as per feats than Carol did. Why do you keep dodging Josh? Double standards much?

Originally posted by FrothByte
And there you go again, dodging the point that Thor actually spent more time in space as per feats than Carol did. Why do you keep dodging Josh? Double standards much?

Concession accepted, Thor's resistance to space is questionable. Man, took you long to realize the meaning of my words.

And? Doesn't mean Carol in her binary form can't replicate the same. Also, I don't remember the exact time of the scene in CM (from the moment she enters space to the moment Ronan leaves).

Josh tries so very hard and still fails.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
Josh tries so very hard and still fails.

You can't differ from winning and failure, just like you can differ from a fake account and a real one.

Pathetic sock.