Originally posted by KingD19So you do not believe the infinity stones or Dormammu can kill her. That was the only way in that given situation with those characters involved with the tech/weapons they have available. You are incapable of common sense and are relying on a only Surtur can nonsensical theory you cannot prove.
And Surtur brought about Ragnarok, you idiot. The only thing able to kill her.So if you've got some evidence of Thanos being the wielder of the Twilight Sword and being the bringer of Ragnarok, bring it out. Otherwise Thanos loses.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
And Thanos was cut by a Human weapon. The IM armour.Difference is Hela instantly heals, and doesnt bleed.
I don't think Hela would recieve less wounds from that than Thanos.
Originally posted by Nevan
Not only is IW Iron Man far stronger than any normal asgardian, but the cut on Thanos's cheek was only a scratch compared to the would be fatal wounds Hela recieved when she was skewered.I don't think Hela would recieve less wounds from that than Thanos.
It's also way easier to wound someone with a weapon than with a punch. Heck, a 3 year old with a knife can still easily wound an adult.
Thanos doesn't have weapons in this fight.
Plus, as already mentioned, Hela simply healed from the wound whereas Thanos didn't.
Originally posted by h1a8
Hela's healing can have something to do with her being on Asgard (where she draws power from). Without her power source, her healing can be affected (speed of healing and number of times of healing).
Unfortunately without any proof to back this up, this theory doesn't really hold much weight in a debate.
Originally posted by Darth ThorThey are nothing to Thor just as normal humans are nothing to tony stark. Think, kid.
People saying “Normal” Asgardians as if they are normal humans.Asgardians are a super race, and their weapons far more durable and advanced than Earths regular ammo.
Also all Helas feats are on Asgard, save the Mjolnir crush. So those are the only feats we have for comparison.
Tony stark tech and the intelligence on planet earth is superior to Asgard despite their physical strengths.
So she is weaker off it thus we can surmise reasonable conclusions.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
People saying “Normal” Asgardians as if they are normal humans.Asgardians are a super race, and their weapons far more durable and advanced than Earths regular ammo.
Also all Helas feats are on Asgard, save the Mjolnir crush. So those are the only feats we have for comparison.
It needs to be proven that their random swords are durable to survive hits from ALL human ammo.
Hela blades were destroyed by human ammo.
Originally posted by h1a8
It needs to be proven that their random swords are durable to survive hits from ALL human ammo.
Hela blades were destroyed by human ammo.
An Asgardian farmer was able to bend a (human) tactical blade in his bare hand. It's pretty common sense to assume that Asgardian weapons are therefore a lot tougher than human weapons, otherwise they won't be effective for their race.
Besides, when was the last time you saw human blades glow like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNh_MOXVasE
Hela's blades are not the average Asgardian weapons. You'll notice that her spears and swords have a tendency to disappear after usage.
Arguing that Asgardian weapons are not incredibly durable considering they can pierce Asgardians who are incredibly durable themselves is the argument of a retard.
In regards to Hela's powers being amped if she's on Asgard, there's reason to believe this when you factor in one spoken and one visual from the film. Odin saying "she draws her power from Asgard" and when she first enters the Bifrost chamber, she has a very visual/body-language power-surge orgasm. To me that implied she powered up, but it's debatable.
Should still be noted that even if this is true, she was powerful enough to stop and crush Mjolnir with ease while on Earth and minutes after leaving her prison.
Originally posted by h1a8
It's up to you to prove their swords can survive hits from ALL human ammo. I have evidence of the contrary.
No, you don't have evidence that ALL human weapons can damage ALL Asgardian weapons.
If you want to claim that guns can damage their equipment (even though we've seen guns leave no damage on Loki's armor) then that's up to you to prove with actual feats.
You can't just make random claims and expect other people to prove them for you.
Originally posted by FrothByte
No you don't have evidence. Unless you're claiming that all Asgardians generate their weapons from thin air?If you want to claim that guns can damage their equipment (even though we've seen guns leave no damage on Loki's armor) then that's up to you to prove.
You can't just make random claims and expect other people to prove them for you.
Notice how h1, the guy that uses high-end feats for characters he likes is trying to use an obvious low-end feat for Hela? it's almost like he's a troll.
Originally posted by FrothByteThe original claim is that random Asgardian swords is beyond ALL human ammo.
No you don't have evidence. Unless you're claiming that all Asgardians generate their weapons from thin air?If you want to claim that guns can damage their equipment (even though we've seen guns leave no damage on Loki's armor) then that's up to you to prove.
You can't just make random claims and expect other people to prove them for you.