The UN wanted to end sex as a weapon of war; Trump admin stopped it.

Started by BrolyBlack5 pages
Originally posted by snowdragon
I smell the troll factor 😉

The moment he showed up he was a trolling.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Free Press means 95% negative coverage of the President? That doesnt sound like free press, that sounds like communism.
I read in another thtead 94% of Scientists were not republicand. That figure would fit for intelligent people.

Originally posted by Premolar
I read in another thtead 94% of Scientists were not republicand. That figure would fit for intelligent people.
very logical.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I don't know where this romanticization of journalists comes from where we're supposed to view them as these morally incorruptible saviors who "speak truth to power" or some shit and how anyone who criticizes large portions of the media is suddenly an authoritarian...

But here's the real truth of the situation, the media doesn't just "speak truth to power," they are a power in and of themselves and they deserve criticism in the same way politicians, or CEOs, or religious institutions do.

I'd like to know where the stupidity in not knowing what real fascism is also comes from.

Originally posted by Flashing Blade
So you are against the media in America and you would rather get your news frim somewhere else. This seems a bit paranoid against our own free society.

By all means, freedom of the press for the win. But they aren't a purely objective innocent institution in society with no power, they are a power in and of themselves, so I will be critical of them in the same way I am critical of politicians.

Because another element of a free society is freedom of speech, and that includes the right of the citizen to criticize media actors. They should not be treated like some special protected class who must never be criticized.

In the same way me criticizing an elected politician isn't me seeking to undermine democracy, me criticizing a member or multiple members of the media isn't me arguing against press freedom.

Personally I think the answer to this is free market competition. The expansion of the dialogue to the point where the traditional media cease to be gatekeepers of political discourse and news.

Thing is, the press isn't free to spread bullshit lies. Any thing they divulge that isn't a confirmed fact should appear in the op ed sections. Period.

And refusing to believe the press at times acts like the enemy is just as dumb as believing it's *always* the enemy.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg

^Same side calling everyone who disagrees with them a fascist or a nazi. Comedy gold.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Personally I think the answer to this is free market competition. The expansion of the dialogue to the point where the traditional media cease to be gatekeepers of political discourse and news.
You don't think that just leas to the increase in fake news and rumour mongering we see now, where important subjects like this are dismissed by people who just don't want to hear it?

Originally posted by Premolar
I read in another thtead 94% of Scientists were not republicand. That figure would fit for intelligent people.

Libtards are so smart they think cutting someones dick off makes them female.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Libtards are so smart they think cutting someones dick off makes them female.

They are so inconsistent in a variety of things it borderlines on parody.

"Trump is destroying democratic norms!"

"Let's pack the courts!"

"Thoughts and prayers don't solve anything"

"Lets shout at the sky in impotent rage cuz our fee fee's are hurt"

"Saying all lives matter is wrong and misses the point"

"It's totally okay we ducked out of a resolution on anti-semitism and just condemned all hate"

I could go on and on.

Originally posted by Surtur
^Same side calling everyone who disagrees with them a fascist or a nazi. Comedy gold.

^Trig'd all day every day

"there are 67 genders"

Originally posted by Bashar Teg

No I agree Trump casts his net too wide, that doesn't mean there isn't a problem with the mainstream media though.

And I can see why some people would consider them the enemy of the American people when people of a similar point of view and principle to myself could predict that if we were public political figures we would be constantly smeared as alt-right the way people like Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, and Carl Benjamin are.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^Trig'd all day every day

Nah you posted a meme, going by your logic you're triggered.

Originally posted by Flashing Blade
You don't think that just leas to the increase in fake news and rumour mongering we see now, where important subjects like this are dismissed by people who just don't want to hear it?

Sure you'd have more people spewing bullshit, but you'd also have more people to challenge the bullshit, a wider range of perspective.

Not to mention a better format to actually delve into things.

Cable news has these little segments, whereas on youtube for example you can get several longform conversations between people who disagree, or detailed explanations of what a person believes.

I can only imagine how triggered Surt is right now.

Trolling Surt behind your ignore list isnt very honorable.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Trolling Surt behind your ignore list isnt very honorable.

I love seeing his obsession on full display though. And I know he's reading my posts, I guarantee it.