Loki vs Immortal Hulk

Originally posted by Galan007
Yeah, that was neat.

I'm just talking about the scene you posted. Emma's like: "Z0MG!!!! Watch what the most powaful one of us can do with the space gem!!!111!1!!!"

Then he just.... Flies. none

😂 😂

i've only barely been following war of the realms--i think it really sucks--so i'm not up on the MOST current loki. i guess if the current version is being shown less capable than the classic one, then maybe hulk can win. and are we giving hulk a gem in this...? 😕

anyway, current, who cares? classic loki still wins this every time.

Originally posted by carver9
Agreed but in issue 6, he did use the gem to punch a black hole inside of someone.

I kid, I kid.

Originally posted by leonidas
i've only barely been following war of the realms--i think it really sucks--so i'm not up on the MOST current loki. i guess if the current version is being shown less capable than the classic one, then maybe hulk can win. and are we giving hulk a gem in this...? 😕

anyway, current, who cares? classic loki still wins this every time.

Naah, not the gem. He is just considered the most powerful on a team that have Loki on it. Hulk is the powerhouse of the team.

Power =/= winning the fight.

There's lots of characters that are more powerful than another one, but they'd lose to them. Match-ups and match-ups.

👆

Versatility is a b*tch.

Only when the 'specialist' is SO specialized, does it make a difference.
Flash, for example. All he does is speed.....but with forum rules as they are, he can trump many others who are more versatile than him.

But at this level, over the distance? Am surprised Carv suddenly doesn't support versatility, unlike in the Surfer/Doomsday thread and the Blue Marvel/WW thread....

^ Those threads didn't have Hulk, though.

Hulk can apparently punch versatility in its face.

We're 15 years into carver not realizing that no matter how strong and durable Hulk will ever get, he can't win against specific power sets, like people who can simply suspend him helpless in air, or who can make it so that they're never touched etc.

Originally posted by Galan007
^ Those threads didn't have Hulk, though.

Hulk can apparently punch versatility in its face.

😂

I agree with Phil. That's why people like Surfer, Beta Ray Bill and Stardust stomps any version of Doomsday skull in.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Only when the 'specialist' is SO specialized, does it make a difference.
Flash, for example. All he does is speed.....but with forum rules as they are, he can trump many others who are more versatile than him.

But at this level, over the distance? Am surprised Carv suddenly doesn't support versatility, unlike in the Surfer/Doomsday thread and the Blue Marvel/WW thread....

Are you implying the forum rules are bias towards only speed? If so, I agree.

Originally posted by carver9
I agree with Phil. That's why people like Surfer, Beta Ray Bill and Stardust stomps any version of World Breaker Hulk's skull in.

fix that for you my boy

Originally posted by carver9
Are you implying the forum rules are bias towards only speed? If so, I agree.

It's not a bias, it's fact.

There's a reason why militaries have been moving toward faster and faster weaponry. From hand held weapons, to slingshots,to arrows, to crossbows, to muskets, to rifles, to missiles, to ICBMs.....propellor driven planes to jet fighters.....speed is and always has been the primary driver of offensive weaponry.

You don't see fighters practicing to be slow, do you?

Originally posted by Galan007
This scene was so laughably retarded.

She wanks Hulk like he can use the space gem to preform some sort of esoteric feat we've never seen before...But then all he does is fly, lol.

Wow... Super creative way to use the infinite power of the space gem there, Hulkie.

GALAN, YOU MONSTER

YOU'RE THE HERALD OF THE LUCIFERIAN AGE

LOOK AT THE LAST PANEL

YOU F*CKING ANTI-CHRIST

I'M REPORTING YOU TO BLUEDICKRIDER

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It's not a bias, it's fact.

There's a reason why militaries have been moving toward faster and faster weaponry. From hand held weapons, to slingshots,to arrows, to crossbows, to muskets, to rifles, to missiles, to ICBMs.....propellor driven planes to jet fighters.....speed is and always has been the primary driver of offensive weaponry.

You don't see fighters practicing to be slow, do you?

So you mention speed but in the same post you mention versatility. The military isnt focusing on ONE weapon either. Even though speed is a factor, they are also trying to revolutionize the weaponry their weapons.

And yes, you are bias.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It's not a bias, it's fact.

There's a reason why militaries have been moving toward faster and faster weaponry. From hand held weapons, to slingshots,to arrows, to crossbows, to muskets, to rifles, to missiles, to ICBMs.....propellor driven planes to jet fighters.....speed is and always has been the primary driver of offensive weaponry.

You don't see fighters practicing to be slow, do you?

Originally posted by carver9
So you mention speed but in the same post you mention versatility. The military isnt focusing on ONE weapon either. Even though speed is a factor, they are also trying to revolutionize the weaponry their weapons.

And yes, you are bias.

Of course they're not.

But speed is a primary attribute.

Who wins - a guy with a Swiss army knife which can do 101 different things, or a guy with a gun?

Originally posted by darthgoober
Oh I don't think that's true at all. Yes speed is a big issue, but it's not like their primary goal is to have rapid firing hand held weapons and slingshots, what the military wants more than anything is to have a lot of options. They want the most efficient ways to bring down the enemy in any given situation whether it's high tech machine guns, napalm, poison gas, cruise missiles, EMPs, or anything else they manage to cook up.

Exactly. I dont know what Darksaint is talking about.