Superman [pre-OWAW] vs Gladiator

Started by h1a86 pages
Originally posted by carver9
Glads destroys.
Originally posted by h1a8
Superman has a long conversation, walks around casually, loosens his tie, etc all in the fraction of a nanosecond.

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman has a long conversation, walks around casually, loosens his tie, etc all in the fraction of a nanosecond.
Party pooper.

Ok..
https://imgur.com/a/W8zLDZW
https://imgur.com/a/1c8pTn8

vs

https://imgur.com/sMC5AbD

Fraction of a nanosecond vs nanoseconds.

So,
- combat speed Superman is superior
- striking
- durability

Anything else? Do we really have to do all the work?

😂

In mathematics, infinitesimal means so small as to be unmeasurable. Unmeasurable > fraction of a nanosecond.

https://imgur.com/a/HUzKvhk

https://imgur.com/a/rtQAcTl

Yes, this is a Gladiator from 30 years in the future, but this is an in-continuity comic and he and current Reed do make reference to their past encounter. That verifies that it's the same Gladiator.

Is....Well, I mean if future versions are allowed.....

Originally posted by TheHulkster
In mathematics, infinitesimal means so small as to be unmeasurable. Unmeasurable > fraction of a nanosecond.

https://imgur.com/a/HUzKvhk

https://imgur.com/a/rtQAcTl

Yes, this is a Gladiator from 30 years in the future, but this is an in-continuity comic and he and current Reed do make reference to their past encounter. That verifies that it's the same Gladiator.

👆

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Is....Well, I mean if future versions are allowed.....
Saint, do you really think anybody reads the rules? I expect What Ifs to be posted soon, too, as desperation escalates. Nevermind what the actual feats mean, lol.

Come carver. Your tiny pencil should, at the very least, be capable of bringing the one feat you're so sure of - Galactus? If the blood isn't running through the brain, at least the waist? Or do you intend to run away for more pages?

Originally posted by carver9
😂
carver, if you aren't at least going to attempt to add anything relevant to the discussion, then stop posting.

You're just trolling at this point and I am tired of dealing with it.

If we want to get technical, the scene with Clark Kent above does not involve combat.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Scientific rules were being completely rewritten, is my point. Was even explicitly said.

So my point is, using it as a yardstick is problematic. Gladiator outdoes the photons of Galactus attack, great. Was the speed of light the same? I cannot say, and neither can you.

Is energy stacking? If he is at 100GJ (as an example, just plucked an easy to use number), and Surfer is 10GJ, does absorbing him mean he's now 110GJ? Then when he has the shits, he's now....95GJ?

Impossible to say. I cannot say it for certain, you can't say it for certain. That's all I've ever said this entire time. Saying you, logically he MUST be super amped from feeding ignores that scientific laws - and hence, logic - were all gone.

Quite a bit of reaching there.

Is it?

If so, point out which parts are incorrect.

Every part where you attempt to claim ambiguity where there is none. The narration explains what is happening setting the default position. Stoic's question is legitimate.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Every part where you attempt to claim ambiguity where there is none. The narration explains what is happening setting the default position. Stoic's question is legitimate.

How is there no ambiguity?

The text clearly states science laws were being rewritten......

Default position was set , true. The setting was a universe where science was essentially gone.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Party pooper.

Ok..
https://imgur.com/a/W8zLDZW
https://imgur.com/a/1c8pTn8

vs

https://imgur.com/sMC5AbD

Fraction of a nanosecond vs nanoseconds.

So,
- combat speed Superman is superior
- striking
- durability

Anything else? Do we really have to do all the work?

This should have ended the discussion already. Why is it still going on?

"Was light speed really light speed". Wow! So name all of the ambiguous things that happened. Was Galactus's eye blast really his eye blast? Was it really Galactus's face that was punched?

I didn't know Galactus' eyeblasts, like the speed of light, is a scientific law.

You may have a point about the punching though. Newton's laws of momentum were probably being violated 👆 good catch.

Edit: did you see my theory on the Heart Force?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
How is there no ambiguity?

The text clearly states science laws were being rewritten......

Default position was set , true. The setting was a universe where science was essentially gone.

Yeah, what was even the point in adding that bit if it's not going to be relevant to Strange and the gang?

It's like you guys would suddenly stop liking Gladiator (because I'm sure all of you are really big fans of the character...) if he didn't suddenly become abstract level.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Yeah, what was even the point in adding that bit if it's not going to be relevant to Strange and the gang?

It's like you guys would suddenly stop liking Gladiator (because I'm sure all of you are really big fans of the character...) if he didn't suddenly become abstract level.

It's collateral damage to show the power exerted. As has been shown so often in comics for dramatic effect. Fabric of reality being torn, etc. etc.

The narration states what Gladiator CAN do while showing him doing it. His capabilities as they happen. Stop reaching guys. If I made your argument against Superman performing identically in an identical situation, you all would go crazy on me.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
It's collateral damage to show the power exerted. As has been shown so often in comics for dramatic effect. Fabric of reality being torn, etc. etc.

The narration states what Gladiator CAN do while showing him doing it. His capabilities as they happen. Stop reaching guys. If I made your argument against Superman performing identically in an identical situation, you all would go crazy on me.

👆

Originally posted by Galan007
carver, if you aren't at least going to attempt to add anything relevant to the discussion, then stop posting.

You're just trolling at this point and I am tired of dealing with it.

Understandable.