Originally posted by TheHulkster
The default setting with regard to the confrontation is what the narration describes. The things you refer to are peripherals. You have to prove that the peripherals override the default. The problem is that Galactus's power causes the peripheral reality warps and it is illogical to state that his power warps his own power.Galactus is a multiversal force at this point and is more than capable of unleashing his power as he desires to. So what happens peripherally has nothing to do with what he does directly. Comprende?
Illogical?
Like in a world where logic and science no longer apply?
Originally posted by carver9
You do this to everyone you debate against. You try to belittle them to make your points stand out more. Hide behind calling people dumb, idiots, where is your brain, etc... I've already posted threads of you doing this. I dont even know why you try it on me when you know it does nothing. You've taken this route for yrs now. Whenever you're ready to debate this topic like adults, I'm here.
Carver you pointed out one thing that happened years ago as it was the reason Superman overcame the time stop. I don't believe this was intentional (you just misunderstood) as you posted the comic for all to read. So in my opinion, you didn't lie.
Yes after the encounter with Hal Superman had some residual energy (like the others). But that in no way allowed Superman to withstand the time stop (the others were frozen). This residue energy allows a user to create constructs and do other GL things, not withstand a time stop. Hal can't withstand a time stop without exiting his body. Superman overcame the time stop due to his super speed (as the writer intented). GL energy does not amp Superman's powers (strength, speed, etc).
Originally posted by -Pr-
You are right about one thing: Philo can be an awful, abrasive prick when he wants to be. And yes, that is bad. But, there is one thing you need to consider:You flat out lied in this post:
Like you've done in so many others. Philo is a lot of things, but he's far more honest about the comics he reads, so even if I didn't like him (but I do, he's yummy), I could respect him for that at least.
So yes, Phil's abrasiveness might get him banned one day because truthfully, a person can only get away with saying so much. The truth is, though, that it's likely to be long after you get banned for such rampant, dishonest, constant trolling.
And I swear, if I see you mention "new KMC rules" or "in character" one more time, I'll ban you out of principal for lying about something I said.
==
All of that said? Back on topic please, and try to use some civility, everyone.
Savage.