General Grievous vs. Wonder Woman

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Aye.

She never blitzed Supe.

Okay, so then you're confusing what street-levelers do when they "Aim-Dodge" vs what Wonder Woman does, which is legitemate bullet timing. Because she didn't watch where he was shooting and then jump in between where she guessed the bullets were going. She literally watched them flying toward her and the hostages in slow motion, then blocked them when they got close enough. Those are two completely different things. That's like saying Quicksilver from Fox or MCU are predicting trajectories when they literally watched bullets flying by them in super slo-mo and had ample time to react.

You're downplaying Diana like hell and uplaying Grievous like a summbitch.

You're the only one who thinks he wins for a reason.

Originally posted by KingD19
Okay, so then you're confusing what street-levelers do when they "Aim-Dodge" vs what Wonder Woman does, which is legitemate bullet timing. Because she didn't watch where he was shooting and then jump in between where she guessed the bullets were going. She literally watched them flying toward her and the hostages in slow motion, then blocked them when they got close enough. Those are two completely different things. That's like saying Quicksilver from Fox or MCU are predicting trajectories when they literally watched bullets flying by them in super slo-mo and had ample time to react.

You're downplaying Diana like hell and uplaying Grievous like a summbitch.

You're the only one who thinks he wins for a reason.

Her reflexes are peak and her arms fast enough to intercept them.

That doesn't mean she can move that fast (bodywise).

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Her reflexes are peak and her arms fast enough to intercept them.

That doesn't mean she can move that fast (bodywise).

It absolutely does. An average bullet moves around 2,500 fps/1,700mph. A bullet from a SCAR battle rifle is even faster because it uses a big round and the bullet goes faster to hit harder. She was a few feet away from the gunman, who himself was a few feet away from the hostages. So she had to cross double the distance to block the bullets. So she was moving far in excess of 1,700mph because she was across the room. And had to run and intercept every single bullet after it was fired. If only her arms were that fast, then everyone would have gotten shot because she couldn't get to them in time.

Math bro. Not that hard. I'm not detailed like guys like ddm, but this is simple stuff.

Originally posted by KingD19
It absolutely does. An average bullet moves around 2,500 fps/1,700mph. A bullet from a SCAR battle rifle is even faster because it uses a big round and the bullet goes faster to hit harder. She was a few feet away from the gunman, who himself was a few feet away from the hostages. So she had to cross double the distance to block the bullets. So she was moving far in excess of 1,700mph because she was across the room. And had to run and intercept every single bullet after it was fired. If only her arms were that fast, then everyone would have gotten shot because she couldn't get to them in time.

Math bro. Not that hard. I'm not detailed like guys like ddm, but this is simple stuff.

She is using her arms to block the rounds once they are fired. That's fast.

However, her lateral movement (body movement) is simply in coordination with how fast the shooter is aiming the gun sideways.

That's fast, for sure. But that doesn't make her a speedblitzer.

Again, Diana has never speedblitz anybody. She is simply peak fast.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I know you would make that bet, you are something of a drooling retard.

And because you are widely-mocked by literally everyone on this board as a drooling retard with literally no one you can claim has a positive opinion of you, your attempt at shaming me for my "reputation" is hilarious. 😂

Everyone is laughing at him😂

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Again with that BS?

I clearly posted the clip where Diana anticipates the shot's trajectory!

I've already stated that I'm not debating ROTJ Grievous.

If you disagree then post the scene showing her running to block the first shots before they are fired.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Read carefully next time Robtard, there is a difference in being able and being fit for a job. Blocking a blaster bolt with a electrostaff is possible, doesn't mean it isn't much harder than with a normal lightsaber.

YouTube video

Your gif is tricky. The clip actually shows Diana anticipating the bullet's trajectory.

The guy's arm is moving in relation to Diana's body movement. She is moving fast, but she isn't a speedster.

Unless you can prove that Grievous will be frozen to Diana, which you haven't, since Diana has never frozen anybody, my points are intact.

Minute 2:36, the guy was about to pull the trigger when Diana broke the roof and felt on the ground with her bracelet anticipating the shot's trajectory.

I wonder if people even analyze the scenes before bringing their arguments to the table.

[QUOTE=17003596]Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
She is using her arms to block the rounds once they are fired. That's fast.

However, her lateral movement (body movement) is simply in coordination with how fast the shooter is aiming the gun sideways.

That's fast, for sure. But that doesn't make her a speedblitzer.

Again, Diana has never speedblitz anybody. She is simply peak fast. [/QUOTE

Peak fast? Going back to that scene with Supes she covers quite a bit of ground almost instant. Much faster than a true Peak like Captain America or Black Panther.

What or who is your definition of speedster? Do they have to be Flash/Quicksilver/Superman speed?

ok, forget speed, you guys clearly can't come to a consensus on that and its annoying (obviously WW is much faster than Grievous btw) her AOE bracelet attack alone would be enough to drop the General and she can do that outside of the range of his Sabers, there's nothing he can do to her this is a spite thread really

Josh is the only one arguing. And with no proof at that. We're all in agreement.

Except you are wrong. I've agreed that Diana will defeat Grievous in a standard fight.

This debate has arose because Robtard believes Diana can defeat a peak Grievous in sword to sword combat.

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
[QUOTE=17003596]Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
[B]She is using her arms to block the rounds once they are fired. That's fast.

However, her lateral movement (body movement) is simply in coordination with how fast the shooter is aiming the gun sideways.

That's fast, for sure. But that doesn't make her a speedblitzer.

Again, Diana has never speedblitz anybody. She is simply peak fast. [/QUOTE

Peak fast? Going back to that scene with Supes she covers quite a bit of ground almost instant. Much faster than a true Peak like Captain America or Black Panther.

What or who is your definition of speedster? Do they have to be Flash/Quicksilver/Superman speed? [/B]

Where's that?

Ofcourse. Diana is no speedster. She lies within the peak fast categoty alongside beings like Thor, Valkyrie and others.

Her body speed isn't fast enough to render Grievous motionless or helpless.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Minute 2:36, the guy was about to pull the trigger when Diana broke the roof and felt on the ground with her bracelet anticipating the shot's trajectory.

I wonder if people even analyze the scenes before bringing their arguments to the table.

No. The shots after that. He shoots before she moves.

Originally posted by h1a8
No. The shots after that. He shoots before she moves.

The shots are within arm reach. Her body is just adjusting for the speed at which the shooter is moving the gun sideways. She isn't running as fast as a bullet.

Originally posted by KingD19
Josh is the only one arguing. And with no proof at that. We're all in agreement.

This is how he’s been been debating for years, it’s sad imp has let him carry on like this with no consequences.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The shots are within arm reach. Her body is just adjusting for the speed at which the shooter is moving the gun sideways. She isn't running as fast as a bullet.

Prove that the initial shots are within arm reach.

Prove that she is tracking the movement of the barrel vs looking at the bullet in the air.

Originally posted by h1a8
Prove that the initial shots are within arm reach.

Prove that she is tracking the movement of the barrel vs looking at the bullet in the air.

Lol! The killer is trying to kill all hostages, which means he is aiming at the person right next to diana for each shot. Diana's arm is long enough.

I don't need to prove logic, you need to prove illogic.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol! The killer is trying to kill all hostages, which means he is aiming at the person right next to diana for each shot. Diana's arm is long enough.

I don't need to prove logic, you need to prove illogic.

It's a machine gun. He's not aiming at a particular person. He's just spraying.

You made the claim that Diana was following his aim and not the bullets. You you must prove your claim.

Originally posted by h1a8
It's a machine gun. He's not aiming at a particular person. He's just spraying.

You made the claim that Diana was following his aim and not the bullets. You you must prove your claim.

He is spraying to the next person, which means Diana is still within arm reach.

I don't need to prove logic. Obviously she knows he is spraying sideways and moving alongside his movement.

She is using her super reflexes to block the bullet with her arms

Again h1, do you have any solid proof that Diana is a speedblitzer? Assumptions won't be accepted.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
He is spraying to the next person, which means Diana is still within arm reach.

I don't need to prove logic. Obviously she knows he is spraying sideways and moving alongside his movement.

She is using her super reflexes to block the bullet with [B]her arms

Again h1, do you have any solid proof that Diana is a speedblitzer? Assumptions won't be accepted. [/B]

Logic? What are you talking about? It's not illogical for a superhuman to see a bullet in the air and run to try to intercept it.

So again, you have to prove that she followed the aim of the gun and not the actual bullets in the air.