Thanos vs Thor, Silver Surfer & Hulk

Started by Insane Titan12 pages

Originally posted by h1a8
Said blasts were striking the planet and only creating small craters.

Blasts capable of shattering planets failed to actually shatter a planet.

previous planets were cracked in half using a wider blast. These blasts were sold concentrated on Thanos, all stated and shown on panel.

As usual you avoid the other kind you can’t refute troll.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
previous planets were cracked in half using a wider blast. These blasts were sold concentrated on Thanos, all stated and shown on panel.

As usual you avoid the other kind you can’t refute troll.

Said blasts were shown striking the planet with only a small crater created.

Originally posted by h1a8
Said blasts were shown striking the planet with only a small crater created.
learn to read idiot. In the panels showing the dead Celestials the narration describes how the Kreee abs shiar home worlds were attacked and you see the planets cracked in half behind, troll.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
learn to read idiot. In the panels showing the dead Celestials the narration describes how the Kreee abs shiar home worlds were attacked and you see the planets cracked in half behind, troll.

Possibly. But in the blasts that were hitting Thanos were not destroying planets at all.

That leaves several possibilities.
1. Those planets were cracked by beams far stronger and or more in quantity (a bunch of blasts instead of 1)
2. The planets and Celestials were damaged by a totally different tech (since we literally don't see what caused the damage of the planet and the Celestials).

1. is more likely true.
But nonetheless, the blasts that hit Thanos wasn't planet shattering because they failed to shatter a planet. Duh.

Originally posted by h1a8
Possibly. But in the blasts that were hitting Thanos were not destroying planets at all.

That leaves several possibilities.
1. Those planets were cracked by beams far stronger and or more in quantity (a bunch of blasts instead of 1)
2. The planets and Celestials were damaged by a totally different tech (since we literally don't see what caused the damage of the planet and the Celestials).

1. is more likely true.
But nonetheless, the blasts that hit Thanos wasn't planet shattering because they failed to shatter a planet. Duh.

more idiocy from you with lame excuses.

The blast were concentrated on Thanos and not the planet itself as the comic says. Drax even says about the planets FULL power being brought to battle (writers intention>>>>>>>>your opinion) ignoring that is trollling.

Again more bs , no other tech is shown to be used. Again the narration describes what Annihilus has been doing with the planets power and it even shows it in action.

Surfer can’t kill Celestials , Thanos with stood what killed them it’s that simple.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
more idiocy from you with lame excuses.

The blast were concentrated on Thanos and not the planet itself as the comic says. Drax even says about the planets FULL power being brought to battle (writers intention>>>>>>>>your opinion) ignoring that is trollling.

Again more bs , no other tech is shown to be used. Again the narration describes what Annihilus has been doing with the planets power and it even shows it in action.

Surfer can’t kill Celestials , Thanos with stood what killed them it’s that simple.

I'm talking about the blasts that hit the planet dummy. They didn't shatter the planet at. Not even 1 trillionth of the damage to shatter a planet.

Originally posted by h1a8
I'm talking about the blasts that hit the planet dummy. They didn't shatter the planet at. Not even 1 trillionth of the damage to shatter a planet.
read the actual book not just a few scans you retard. Writers intention trumps your bullshit excuses.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
read the actual book not just a few scans you retard. Writers intention trumps your bullshit excuses.

Writer's intentions were that those were not blasts that can shatter a planet. Otherwise, we would see the planet shatter after the blasts struck it.

Think about it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Writer's intentions were that those were not blasts that can shatter a planet. Otherwise, we would see the planet shatter after the blasts struck it.

Think about it.

The writers intention was to have the planets full destructive power at play and that’s why he had Drax say those very words. Along with having Annihilus say concentrate the fire power on Thanos.

To say otherwise is outright lies and trolling ignoring the comic. If you have any other on panel proof saying it let’s see it.

Along with proof surfers output can put down celestial, which Thanos withstood. Or this bullshit it was different tech used. Any on panel showings from that story that disprove it will do.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
The writers intention was to have the planets full destructive power at play and that’s why he had Drax say those very words. Along with having Annihilus say concentrate the fire power on Thanos.

To say otherwise is outright lies and trolling ignoring the comic. If you have any other on panel proof saying it let’s see it.

Along with proof surfers output can put down celestial, which Thanos withstood. Or this bullshit it was different tech used. Any on panel showings from that story that disprove it will do.

All that matters is the blasts failed to destroy the planet upon striking it. Therefore, the blasts were not capable of shattering a planet. You can insert any reason for why that is but the fact still remains.

You are using the logic that we assume a character has the strength to lift a car but fails to do so when trying to lift a car. But you still claim he exerted the force capable of lifting a car on panel.

What version of the characters are being used? If these are the characters at their base levels, Thanos should win this. He solo'd the Annihilators. The Hulk is really a non factor as he can be sent away, the Surfer even the new intangible one can be affected by powerful magic, and Thor as a Sky Father would be his biggest challenge, but Cates shows that Thanos defeats this version of Thor in a future.

Gonna go with Thanos winning this.

Originally posted by Stoic
but Cates shows that Thanos defeats this version of Thor in a future.
*Sigh*

Originally posted by h1a8
All that matters is the blasts failed to destroy the planet upon striking it. Therefore, the blasts were not capable of shattering a planet. You can insert any reason for why that is but the fact still remains.

You are using the logic that we assume a character has the strength to lift a car but fails to do so when trying to lift a car. But you still claim he exerted the force capable of lifting a car on panel.

so in this instance writer intention means nothing because it goes against your bullshit excuses. You’re a retard troll

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
*Sigh*

Did I make an inaccurate statement? Thanos under Cates not only defeated Old King Thor, but he also killed Galactus of that future. That future also has Cosmic Ghost Rider who I believe had knowledge of those events.

Having knowledge of these events =/= it being the canon past.

Kingdom Come Superman had 'knowledge' of his past, doesn't mean Kingdom Come is canon to Earth Prime, even when he was running around with Earth Prime JSA.

Originally posted by Stoic
Did I make an inaccurate statement? Thanos under Cates not only defeated Old King Thor, but he also killed Galactus of that future. That future also has Cosmic Ghost Rider who I believe had knowledge of those events.
people don’t want to acknowledge it because duh Thanos despite it all been relayed in his official 616 bio.

Lol