Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering feat?

Originally posted by h1a8
The whole platform was collapsing as the creature was crawling underneath. It's was highly unstable.

That wasn't until well after Thor's strike, so are you ever going to back up your claim that Thor initiated the shattering by damaging support pillars.

Originally posted by Silent Master
That wasn't until well after Thor's strike, so are you ever going to back up your claim that Thor initiated the shattering by damaging support pillars.

Originally posted by h1a8
Happened before or after is irrelevant. It was a fresh platform, connected to intact support pillars, in a different location that collapsed.

It very relevant as Superman is placed in the same circumstances as Thor and has to replicate his feat. that means he starts in the same place as Thor and has to shatter the same ground.

So for your argument to even remotely hold up, you'd have to prove the area directly around Thor's strike had support pillars.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It very relevant as Superman is placed in the same circumstances as Thor and has to replicate his feat. that means he starts in the same place as Thor and has to shatter the same ground.

So for your argument to even remotely hold up, you'd have to prove the area directly around Thor's strike had support pillars.

I don't have to prove that in order for my argument to hold. We know that there is empty space under the ice and support pillars throughout. We see this when the creature comes out and also in Thor's feat (the ground collapses and falls a distance).

We see the creature collapse the platform without effecting the pillars. It creates an instability which causes a domino effect.

Thor heated the platform with a blast of energy.

If true, you'll have no problems providing a clip that proves the area immediately around Thor's strike had support pillars.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If true, you'll have no problems providing a clip that proves the area immediately around Thor's strike had support pillars.

"area immediately" is not well defined.

If there weren't any support pillars then the feat is easier.

Originally posted by h1a8

Thor heated the platform with a blast of energy.

That would have needed to be an extremely hot blast in order to destabilize such thick ice over such a large area. In the end, you still haven't posted anything that proves Superman can achieve the same feat in the same circumstances.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Most people see Superman's striking feats in MOS as superior.

Lol.no they dont

Originally posted by FrothByte
That would have needed to be an extremely hot blast in order to destabilize such thick ice over such a large area. In the end, you still haven't posted anything that proves Superman can achieve the same feat in the same circumstances.

Originally posted by h1a8
"area immediately" is not well defined.

If there weren't any support pillars then the feat is easier.

Prove it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman can use HV and achieve the same results. Possibly punch it as well.

Prove it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman can use HV and achieve the same results. Possibly punch it as well.

Prove it. Show me a feat of Superman using his HV to cause such huge devastation with a single shot.

It takes this many losers to make this thread go this long, lol, who cares.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Prove it. Show me a feat of Superman using his HV to cause such huge devastation with a single shot.

Originally posted by h1a8
He just needs to cause enough damage to create an instability. Remember, he can use one continuous beam.

No he can't use a continuous beam. Per OP:

*Clark has to do it with a single strike

Please stop trying to weasel around the stips.

Originally posted by FrothByte
No he can't use a continuous beam. Per OP:

*Clark has to do it with a single strike

Please stop trying to weasel around the stips.

Thor did it with one continuous lightning blast. The OP is defining that as one strike.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove it.

Prove it.

The ground is stronger near support pillars and weaker away. A good enough crack or damage can make the platform collapse.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor did it with one continuous lightning blast. The OP is defining that as one strike.

Thor's lightning blast lasted a second. Are you saying Clark can accomplish the same with a second's worth of HV?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor's lightning blast lasted a second. Are you saying Clark can accomplish the same with a second's worth of HV?

Doesn't matter. It was a continuous beam as you said it wasn't.

Originally posted by h1a8
Doesn't matter. It was a continuous beam as you said it wasn't.

Yeah, it wasn't. I rewatched the scene. From the moment Thor discharges the lightning on the ground till it ends takes less than a second. Calling that a "continuous" strike is just plain trolling at this point.

In any case, whatever your definition for continuous is, you still haven't answered the question: Can Clark use his HV in as short a time to cause a similar amount of destruction?

Originally posted by h1a8
The ground is stronger near support pillars and weaker away. A good enough crack or damage can make the platform collapse.

Again, prove Superman can dish out enough damage.