Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering feat?

Started by h1a816 pages
Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, prove Superman can dish out enough damage.

Superman's HV feat against Ibeam. Superman's strength feats, etc.

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman's HV feat against Ibeam. Superman's strength feats, etc.

Not even close to being proof. Which specific striking feats?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not even close to being proof. Which specific striking feats?

Striking feats?

Knocking Zod nearly a mile away.
Uppercut to the top of a skyscraper while creating a crater in the bricks at the top of a skyscraper.
Knocking Aquaman far away with a casual blow.

The amount of heat needed to melt several inches of structural steel instantly is insane. One swipe of Hv would do the trick.

I didn't ask for inferior feats, I asked for feats that prove Superman could match Thor's feat.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I didn't ask for inferior feats, I asked for feats that prove Superman could match Thor's feat.

The feats prove that Superman can cause a domino effect in the ground.

And you don't understand the physics of a projectile going through something.

You believe Superman would simply punch a hole in the ice.
There is a huge amount of energy that would be imparted throughout.
look at 0:56

Prove it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove it.

I did. Superman's feats prove it.
Superman can punch the ground hard enough and impart enough energy to create a domino effect.

The creature was doing it while only supplying its weight as the force.

No, you just made claims. you've provided no proof that those feats represent enough force to replicate Thor's Jotunheim buster.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you just made claims. you've provided no proof that those feats represent enough force to replicate Thor's Jotunheim buster.

Just because you don't think something is proof doesn't make it not.

You have to refute why it isn't proof, not just say it isn't.
I stated facts, not claims.

It wasn't proof, you just named a couple feats and declared they were proof.

Now. since you seem to be of the opinion that mearly declaring something to be true counts as proof. Those weren't feats. there, using h1's logic. I just "proved" those feats weren't proof. try again.

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman's HV feat against Ibeam. Superman's strength feats, etc.

Please post a scene where Superman's HV caused massive shockwaves.

Pretty sure HV would just melt the ice. Come on now. Quit with these shenanigans

Originally posted by FrothByte
Please post a scene where Superman's HV caused massive shockwaves.

The HV can melt a relevant portion of the ice with a swipe. Causing an instability and a domino effect. Plus the heat will be absorbed throughout a large portion of the ice, causing it to melt.

Originally posted by h1a8
The HV can melt a relevant portion of the ice with a swipe. Causing an instability and a domino effect. Plus the heat will be absorbed throughout a large portion of the ice, causing it to melt.

Please post proof of Superman's HV causing as much destruction as Thor's shockwave.

Originally posted by h1a8
The HV can melt a relevant portion of the ice with a swipe. Causing an instability and a domino effect. Plus the heat will be absorbed throughout a large portion of the ice, causing it to melt.

Prove it can do enough damage to replicate Thor's attack.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove it can do enough damage to replicate Thor's attack.
Prove the minimum damage Thor needed to do in order to cause a chain reaction domino effect.

^
Attemtping to shift the burden means you lost.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Please post proof of Superman's HV causing as much destruction as Thor's shockwave.

Thors heat possibly caused more damage as it flowed throughout the ice.

But thats irrelevant. You are changing the goalposts.
It's about power. I can cause a lot of damage to fluff objects over seconds or I can cause damage to a far more durable objects nearly instantly. Superman sliced through structural steel nearly instantly. He swipes the ground for a few moments and create devastating results.

Superman can achieve the feat with a punch.
Superman can punch more than 1/100th the speed of light. From the flash scene we see Superman throw his first punch as lightning from Flash travels and hits the statue. Lightning is about 1/3rd the speed of light. So if Superman punched with 1/30th of the speed of that lightning stroke (it was visually closer to 1/10th) then he punched with more than 1/100th of the speed of light. The kinetic energy he could impart in the ground is more than enough(more than 2e13J or more than 1/20th of a typical hydrogen bomb).

Originally posted by Silent Master
^
Attemtping to shift the burden means you lost.

No amount of energy needed by Superman wouldnt be proof to you since you dont know much energy it takes to do the feat. I could prove that Superman can output a petawatt times a billion and you would say "prove that is enough ". So since you don't know how much energy it took then you can't objectively say whether Superman can do it or not.

But anyway I proved it again above this post.

What you've proven is that you can't back up your claim.

Better luck next time.