Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering feat?

The length some of you homos go to, to try and go to discredit anything Thor does is hysterical. 😂

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, I'm following the conditions, you're making things up. as usual.

Thor did it with a continuous blast of energy. It was ONE blast and therefore ONE strike. Therefore Superman can do it with One continuous strike of HV.

Originally posted by LordGod
Bingo. 👆

Realistically all you'd have to do is take out a few of those pillars and the entire thing would then collapse in a domino effect. Pretty obvious that's what happened there IMO.

Afterall, we've seen Thor's lightning attacks strike the -solid- ground on several other occasions and it didn't cause anywhere near that level of collateral damage.

Although I agree with Jotunheim's surface being hollow and supported by pilars, the OP has stated that Superman has to replicate the feat in one strike.

In that aspect, he won't be able to cause the amount of damage the lightning did, as a direct impact from, per say, a punch would cause likely cause a straight through hole and not really a ripple effect.

The ripple effect was caused by massive amounts of electricity flowing through the ice and weakening several pilars, not just one.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor did it with a continuous blast of energy. It was ONE blast and therefore ONE strike. Therefore Superman can do it with One continuous strike of HV.

If heat vision comes to bear, then you'd have a point, but the effect on the ice would be different though.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Although I agree with Jotunheim's surface being hollow and supported by pilars, the OP has stated that Superman has to replicate the feat in one strike.

In that aspect, he won't be able to cause the amount of damage the lightning did, as a direct impact from, per say, a punch would cause likely cause a straight through hole and not really a ripple effect.

The ripple effect was caused by massive amounts of electricity flowing through the ice and weakening several pilars, not just one.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Yeah, because thor struck a hollow iceberg that collapsed in on itself because he took out the support.

Yeah, because buildings are not hollow themselves right?

That's why I'm saying it's a similar feat. The initial shock wave is about the same size(when debris is being tossed into the air when thor strikes, not collapsing in on itself) and both lead to the structure collapsing.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
That's why I'm saying it's a similar feat. The initial shock wave is about the same size(when debris is being tossed into the air when thor strikes, not collapsing in on itself) and both lead to the structure collapsing.

Except the building didn't collapse. It took out a chunk off the face of the building but it didn't collapse. Thor's hit took out a good chunk off the face of the tundra but then also continued to collapse the surrounding area.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Although I agree with Jotunheim's surface being hollow and supported by pilars, the OP has stated that Superman has to replicate the feat in one strike.

In that aspect, he won't be able to cause the amount of damage the lightning did, as a direct impact from, per say, a punch would cause likely cause a straight through hole and not really a ripple effect.

The ripple effect was caused by massive amounts of electricity flowing through the ice and weakening several pilars, not just one.

Could absolutely weaken a few of the underlying pillars and cause a domino effect that crumbles the entire surface, like Thor's lightning blast did. Rock>ice, afterall, and Superman shattered the top of that mountain just by accidentally falling into it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor did it with a continuous blast of energy. It was ONE blast and therefore ONE strike. Therefore Superman can do it with One continuous strike of HV.

No, because HV would just melt through the ice, not cause a massive shockwave.

Originally posted by LordGod
Given the context of Thor's feat, I think it's conceivable that Superman doing something like this to Jotunheim's surface-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JsJUWrCa2s&t=2m8s

Could absolutely weaken a few of the underlying pillars and cause a domino effect that crumbles the entire surface, like Thor's lightning blast did. Rock>ice, afterall, and Superman shattered the top of that mountain just by accidentally falling into it.

How would Superman do that with one strike to the surface?

Originally posted by Silent Master
How would Superman do that with one strike to the surface?

But the OP asks if he has -ANY- striking feat comparable. And if he struck the surface of Jotunheim like he struck that mountain, it's conceivable that he could weaken some of the underlying pillars and cause a domino effect that crumbles the entire surface, like Thor's lightning blast did.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He's the greatest murderer.

Almost anything is "conceivable" that doesn't mean it's likely to happen. even assuming Superman's impact causes enough damage to start a chain reaction. where is your proof that sed reaction would spread as far as Thor's?

a.] There's no tangible "proof" that anyone can provide here, genius. Superman is a DC character, and obviously will never be in a position to fight frost giants on Jotunheim in the MCU, lol. All we can do is logically speculate and scale based on the feats he has preformed.

b.] Once the collapse is initiated by way of weakening the underlying ice pillars, basic engineering dictates that the entire structure is going to collapse as a result. That's how Thor's bolt brought down the surface; that's how Superman's "mountain strike" could conceivably do the same.

a)Thanks for admitting you have no proof.

b)So your claim is that if a structure for example is 1,000 miles long. it losing a couple support pillars from one tiny section will cause the entire 1,000 mile long structure to collapse?

Originally posted by LordGod
You're an idiot.

I suggest actually watching the movie. 🙂

Not wasting any more time addressing your nonpoints. You "debate" like you're 6 years old, lol.

Yes, demanding proof of claims is certainly how most 6 year olds argue, rather than adults who resort to insults when they don't get their way.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, because HV would just melt through the ice, not cause a massive shockwave.

How would Superman do that with one strike to the surface?

Lightning is hot too. I didn't see any Shockwave. Even so, once enough ice is melted the structure will collapse. Superman can take all day if he wants. As long as it's ONE continuous blast.

Originally posted by h1a8
Lightning is hot too. I didn't see any Shockwave. Even so, once enough ice is melted the structure will collapse. Superman can take all day if he wants. As long as it's ONE continuous blast.

A single strike is not the same as a single continuous blast. Thus the descriptive word "continuous".

Originally posted by h1a8
Lightning is hot too. I didn't see any Shockwave. Even so, once enough ice is melted the structure will collapse. Superman can take all day if he wants. As long as it's ONE continuous blast.

Prove that Superman can fire a blast for that long.