Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering feat?

Started by h1a816 pages

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering feat?

Originally posted by FrothByte
A single strike is not the same as a single continuous blast. Thus the descriptive word "continuous".

Of course it's the same. Thor's blast was continuous. OP is implying that it is a single strike

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering feat?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove that Superman can fire a blast for that long.

It would take probably a few seconds. Surely Superman can fire for that long.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering fea

Originally posted by h1a8
It would take probably a few seconds. Surely Superman can fire for that long.

Prove that it would only take a few seconds.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove that it would only take a few seconds.

The feat where the HV cuts the Ibeam in half with a swipe.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shatte

Originally posted by h1a8
The feat where the HV cuts the Ibeam in half with a swipe.

How is that proof he can replicate the glacier shattering feat?

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering fea

Originally posted by h1a8
Of course it's the same. Thor's blast was continuous. OP is implying that it is a single strike

Wrong. I don't think you know what continuous actually means.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier sh

Originally posted by Silent Master
How is that proof he can replicate the glacier shattering feat?
Steel>>>Ice

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacier shattering

Originally posted by FrothByte
Wrong. I don't think you know what continuous actually means.

The lightning was a continuous flow of energy. If you disagree then the debate is over. I'm not about to waste my time on you trolling the thread.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Can Superman Replicate Thor's glacie

Originally posted by h1a8
Steel>>>Ice

Ok, but how does that prove his heat vision can replicate the glacier shattering feat?

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
The length some of you homos go to, to try and go to discredit anything Thor does is hysterical. 😂

Hey bro I'm not discrediting anything Thor did with his incredibly powerful plot device hammer 😛

Originally posted by Surtur
Hey bro I'm not discrediting anything Thor did with his incredibly powerful plot device hammer 😛

Yep, you're admitting that Thor is so powerful that Superman would be jealous. 😮‍💨

How could Superman not be jealous of the mass murder potential of that hammer?

True.

Thor literally beheaded Thanos and killed who knows how many mooks. Why are people still salty that MoS killed Zod?

It's a joke there is no actual salt here.

I will point out the difference though for those legit bothered is Superman is generally thought of someone who doesn't kill no matter what. People do not view Thor like that.

Though it would have been silly for Superman to f*ck people over just to keep the moral high round, who is he...Captain Janeway?

Originally posted by Surtur
I will point out the difference though for those legit bothered is Superman is generally thought of someone who doesn't kill no matter what.

Those people need to read that comic where he executes Zod and two other Kryptonians, then.

Originally posted by LordGod
Given the context of Thor's feat, I think it's conceivable that Superman doing something like this to Jotunheim's surface-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JsJUWrCa2s&t=2m8s

Could absolutely weaken a few of the underlying pillars and cause a domino effect that crumbles the entire surface, like Thor's lightning blast did. Rock>ice, afterall, and Superman shattered the top of that mountain just by accidentally falling into it.

In order for that to happen, several pillars would have to be damaged. Now, a direct impact from Superman wouldn't cause the same effect on hollow ice than it did on solid rock.

The only way for Superman's impact to damage several pilars is through sismic waves derived from it. Now, sismic waves travel perfectly fine through very solid material like rock, but materials like ice would break and absorb such sismic waves.

So, I believe Superman's impact would rather have a clean penetration, rather than a surface wide effect.

I think using HV would be more effective to try replicate the feat.

Do you mean without destroying the entire planet?

Originally posted by Psychotron
Those people need to read that comic where he executes Zod and two other Kryptonians, then.

True, but that does drive him insane right? At least temporarily. What a pussy.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
In order for that to happen, several pillars would have to be damaged. Now, a direct impact from Superman wouldn't cause the same effect on hollow ice than it did on solid rock.

The only way for Superman's impact to damage several pilars is through sismic waves derived from it. Now, sismic waves travel perfectly fine through very solid material like rock, but materials like ice would break and absorb such sismic waves.

So, I believe Superman's impact would rather have a clean penetration, rather than a surface wide effect.

I think using HV would be more effective to try replicate the feat.

Thing is, Superman doesn't know about the pillars.