Originally posted by Robtard
That's a long and highly defensive way to dodge a simple question.You said:
"Yeah, if we have an annual flu vaccine and still we end up with tens of thousands of deaths each flu season, I'm unsure what type of protection reduction we are considering.
What did deaths per capita look like before we got hip with annual flu vaccines? In other words, what was the reduction? From what I read, it was 20%-35%. That's a ton of lives saved but it will never be "safe enough" to re-open America if that's the standard people are wanting." -DDM
I'm asking your opinion on whether or not you specifically believe we need a vaccine for covid-19. Not what other people believe.
And I directly addressed your dishonest question in my reply. You have not addressed my reply and, instead, have doubled down on your idiocy.
Address my reply instead of doubling down.
Start here:
That's not in my post at all nor is it implied.You have the entire post quoted. There's no excuse for this type of ignorance.
What's your objective with this dishonesty?
If you are not honest enough to admit you tried to strawman my point with a loaded question, you're not worth engaging and are wasting time.
If you're honest enough to admit you tried to strawman my position with a loaded question, we can continue. If not, I'll just skip - not interested in these types of convos that you have with Surtur.