Ares (DCEU) vs. Hela (MCU)

Started by h1a812 pages

Originally posted by Nibedicus
See? This is why everyone thinks you are a troll. You are dishonest and everything you said up there is just bait. But I’m bored so I’ll bite.

You are accusing me of moving the goalposts while at the same time moving the goalposts yourself. La dee dah. Predictable h1 projection-troll.

Ok, let’s test your “honesty” level here.

Were you or were you not shown that Cap can do advanced grappling techniques by SM? (Y/N)

Are the techniques shown by SM techniques a pure striker would use? (Y/N)

Did you and did you not still insist that a specific sequence of tackling is required before you would accept it AFTER SM has already shown you the techniques Cap used? (Y/N)

3 simple questions. Answer them honestly and you are busted for projection. Answer them falsely and the world sees how much of a idiot/liar you are.

This should be interesting.

My intention was primarily showing Cap tackling someone to the ground. Silent didn't provide any scenes where that occurred. He provided a lot of irrelevant scenes (Cap fighting on the ground, Cap striking someone with a shield push hit, Cap getting someone on the ground that didn't consist of tackling them to the ground). That's what I meant when I argued the proper combination (not necessarily sequence). He had to first establish Cap tackling someone to the ground (as this stems from the original argument about Comedian).

In summary, Silent was arguing shit whose spirit does not stem from Comedian tackling Ozy.

Originally posted by h1a8
My intention was primarily showing Cap tackling someone to the ground. Silent didn't provide any scenes where that occurred. He provided a lot of irrelevant scenes (Cap fighting on the ground, Cap striking someone with a shield push hit, Cap getting someone on the ground that didn't consist of tackling them to the ground). That's what I meant when I argued the proper combination (not necessarily sequence). He had to first establish Cap tackling someone to the ground (as this stems from the original argument about Comedian).

In summary, Silent was arguing shit whose spirit does not stem from Comedian tackling Ozy.

Answer the questions. 3 questions yes or no.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Answer the questions. 3 questions yes or no.

My statement answers the questions.
Your questions are misleading and leads someone to a false conclusion.
They paint a one sided picture that doesn't convey the full picture.
Also asking setup questions instead of getting to the point is rather deceiving.

Also, it does not matter what my argument WAS or WAS PERCEIVED TO Be, but what MY CURRENT argument is.

^ can’t even answer 3 simple questions.

Obvious liar-troll caught.

/thread.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
^ can’t even answer 3 simple questions.

Obvious liar-troll caught.

/thread.

For you to insist on getting me to answer loaded questions KNOWING that my statement paints the full picture proves that it is your intention to flame and troll me via being deceitful.

^ Yeah. Nobody believes that. Questions were simple. You clearly are afraid to answer because then you’d get caught in your dishonest liar-y attempt at changing the narrative.

Obvious liar-troll caught.

/thread

Originally posted by Nibedicus
^ can't even answer 3 simple questions.

Obvious liar-troll caught.

/thread.

Agreed.

Originally posted by h1a8
For you to insist on getting me to answer loaded questions KNOWING that my statement paints the full picture proves that it is your intention to flame and troll me via being deceitful.

You suck, you and Cuck Alexander are the reason no one posts here anymore

The last three posts are on target.

H1 is a troll.

Hela wins.

i'll bet anyone this thread will last until the nfl draft

Originally posted by h1a8
My statement answers the questions.
Your questions are misleading and leads someone to a false conclusion.
They paint a one sided picture that doesn't convey the full picture.
Also asking setup questions instead of getting to the point is rather deceiving.

Also, it does not matter what my argument WAS or WAS PERCEIVED TO Be, but what MY CURRENT argument is.

I read the questions Nib asked, there's nothing misleading about them. They're very straightforward and unbiased.

Were you or were you not shown that Cap can do advanced grappling techniques by SM?

^There's nothing misleading about that. If you think that's a misleading question then you have no idea what a misleading question is.

Rather, it seems to show that you're refusing to answer the question because it will highlight how dumb your stance is.

Originally posted by h1a8
For you to insist on getting me to answer loaded questions KNOWING that my statement paints the full picture proves that it is your intention to flame and troll me via being deceitful.

When everyone says you are wrong, you are wrong.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I read the questions Nib asked, there's nothing misleading about them. They're very straightforward and unbiased.

^There's nothing misleading about that. If you think that's a misleading question then you have no idea what a misleading question is.

Rather, it seems to show that you're refusing to answer the question because it will highlight how dumb your stance is.

I disagree. My stance is fairly simple and very logical.

If you disagree then clearly explain why you think so.

Originally posted by h1a8
I disagree. My stance is fairly simple and very logical.

If you disagree then clearly explain why you think so.

My post mentioned nothing about your "stance".

My post was about pointing out your inability to answer a simple question.

Originally posted by FrothByte
My post mentioned nothing about your "stance".

My post was about pointing out your inability to answer a simple question.

Agreed, h1 is just too scared to answer them.

H1 should have been banned a long time.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
You suck, you and Cuck Alexander are the reason no one posts here anymore

Reported for baiting. Take any personal comments to the Off Topic Circle Jerk.

Thanks.

Originally posted by FrothByte
My post mentioned nothing about your "stance".

My post was about pointing out your inability to answer a simple question.

That's because they are loaded questions. My post explained EVERYTHING ABOUT THE SITUATION. Anyone could read it and answer any relevant questions. The fact that he's asking is a trap.

My point is just be direct and say what you think. Enough with the baiting.

H1 is just dragging this on so that he can mash the report button hoping for someone to bail him out. He’s been caught.

Just save this thread and reference under it under “more of h1’s lying caught red handed” for future debates with the guy then ignore his attempts at changing the narrative and return to topic before this gets buried in pages of him lying or before a mod closes the thread.

If he wants to clear his name, he can always BZ me after all.

Originally posted by h1a8
That's because they are loaded questions. My post explained EVERYTHING ABOUT THE SITUATION. Anyone could read it and answer any relevant questions. The fact that he's asking is a trap.

My point is just be direct and say what you think. Enough with the baiting.

No dude, it seems apparent that you don't know what a loaded question is. Just because someone asks a question you don't want to answer doesn't mean it's a loaded question.

Now, are you going to answer the simple questions or are you going to continue being a troll?