Which of these characters can replicate this feat

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
If the pressure of Black Holes is less than a Stellar Weight, then how was the material of those chains manipulated under the pressure of an inverted Black hole?
A Black Hole should be logically stronger than a White Hole, because it absorbs, whereas a White Hole emits.
Absorbing something requires more pressure than releasing said thing.

Those chains can pull starS FTL from one galaxy to another. No one on this list can break them.

That's pure speculation. Admantium has nothing do here.

they're used to haul stars, but it wasn't shown at what speed or within what time period.
Saying that it's FTL is speculation.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Who know what else was involved with creating those chains. Admentium is made on earth via bonding process.

Those chains can pull starS FTL from one galaxy to another. No one on this list can break them.

Until otherwise stated, we are limited.to how they are stated to have been forged.

He may not be on the list, but Surfer can break them.

https://imgur.com/a/VfTSkX4
https://imgur.com/a/fwrUayd

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil

Gladiator is the weakest of them (excluding Blue Marvel), and he tore apart a Black hole once.

and Where was it shown that an inverted Black Hole is even close to what you mentioned

I forgot that Gladiator did rip a black hole with his hands.

Everyone on this list is weaker then Gladiator.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
If the pressure of Black Holes is less than a Stellar Weight, then how was the material of those chains manipulated under the pressure of an inverted Black hole?
A Black Hole should be logically stronger than a White Hole, because it absorbs, whereas a White Hole emits.
Absorbing something requires more pressure than releasing said thing.

3rd, when people mention black holes they are referring to the event horizon (a region of space), not the singularity in the center (which is the size of an atom). Inside the event, the pressure is less than stellar. But when you get infinitesimally close to the singularity then the pressure would exceed stellar amount.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
BM is a definete no. He hasnt done anything strengthwise that woyld make me think twice. The others have some ridic otherworldly shiet that theyve done.
And im only putting Thanos as a yes because he's always written above the ones on the list.
Sentry is... I dont know. He is all over the place. So yes for him too. Wutever.

Carver should get reported by naming BM. He doesn't even have a planetary feat, let alone a stellar feat.

Originally posted by carver9
😂 ...you just proved my point. The chains Superman broke doesnt have any fts, it's basically statements and it was called unbreakable chains. Both showings are hyperbole. Both of them. This is why I said everyone on the list can pull this ft off.

Superman didnt break unbreakable chains. That would be a contradiction. The chains were not unbreakable because they were broken. Yes, stating that they are unbreakable is hyperbole. The feat is what the chains are capable of doing. That's what we are going by, not the unbreakable stance.

Good so you agree that the statement "any pressure" is false when shown otherwise.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
they're used to haul stars, but it wasn't shown at what speed or within what time period.
Saying that it's FTL is speculation.

It's not speculation. We go by writers intent. It is understood to haul them in a reasonable amount of time (like days or hours, not years or longer). The writer purposely is hyping up the chains to show how powerful Superman is. Do you really think he will lowball the feat to contradict him hyping the feat? Why did he make them to go from galaxy to galaxy and not star system to star system? Because he knows intergalactic space is much larger and requires a larger speed to travel in a reasonable amount of time.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Until otherwise stated, we are limited.to how they are stated to have been forged.

He may not be on the list, but Surfer can break them.

https://imgur.com/a/VfTSkX4
https://imgur.com/a/fwrUayd

1. deadpool team up is non canon

2. that's not a sun, it's a huge fireball

how on earth does this feat explain surfer can break chains that pull billions of suns from one galaxy to another....is delusion beyond me

Originally posted by h1a8
You are assuming here.
1st white holes are not proven to exist, so there is no actual science on them. So in fiction, they can have more pressure than a black hole can if the writer wanted.
2nd, absorbing something requires more pressure than releasing is a false statement.

3rd, when people mention black holes they are referring to the event horizon (a region of space), not the singularity in the center (which is the size of an atom). Inside the event, the pressure is less than stellar. But when you get infinitesimally close to the singularity then the pressure would exceed stellar amount.

Carver should get reported by naming BM. He doesn't even have a planetary feat, let alone a stellar feat.

Superman didnt break unbreakable chains. That would be a contradiction. The chains were not unbreakable because they were broken. Yes, stating that they are unbreakable is hyperbole. The feat is what the chains are capable of doing. That's what we are going by, not the unbreakable stance.

Good so you agree that the statement "any pressure" is false when shown otherwise.

He said the chains were unbreakable and they were broken which contradicts his statement. That alone makes his entire statement questionable. Also, H1, if I feel Blue Marvel can do the ft, I have every eight to believe he can do it.

Originally posted by carver9
I forgot that Gladiator did rip a black hole with his hands.

Hyperbole. You cant grab a black hole to even rip it. It's just space.
And what you are not understanding is that the feat takes more than trillions of stellar weight to achieve.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Until otherwise stated, we are limited.to how they are stated to have been forged.

He may not be on the list, but Surfer can break them.

https://imgur.com/a/VfTSkX4
https://imgur.com/a/fwrUayd

So Surfer can exert trillions of stellar weight of force? This showing doesn't even show him able to exert a planet of force.

an unimpressive feat from a non canon book, dunno why he brought it up, that wasn't even a sun, it was bigger than the planet but do you realize how big star is compare to even the biggest sized planet?

Originally posted by carver9
He said the chains were unbreakable and they were broken which contradicts his statement. That alone makes his entire statement questionable. Also, H1, if I feel Blue Marvel can do the ft, I have every eight to believe he can do it.

You don't have every right. If you have no have a basis for what you say then you are trolling. That's a fact. You have no basis for saying BM can do it other than trolling the thread. That's like me saying Spider-Man or Batman can do it because I believe they can in order to downplay the character you are arguing against.

A character can believe something is unbreakable because of what they know they are capable of. But that doesn't make what they are capable of questionable or false. And you are clearly ignoring writers intent.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
they're used to haul stars, but it wasn't shown at what speed or within what time period.
Saying that it's FTL is speculation.

Originally posted by h1a8
Hyperbole. You cant grab a black hole to even rip it. It's just space.
And what you are not understanding is that the feat takes more than trillions of stellar weight to achieve.

Lol and you cant put chains on a sun and pull it (like, wtf). You're arguing hyperbole with hyperbole.

Originally posted by h1a8
You don't have every right. If you have no have a basis for what you say then you are trolling. That's a fact. You have no basis for saying BM can do it other than trolling the thread. That's like me saying Spider-Man or Batman can do it because I believe they can in order to downplay the character you are arguing against.

A character can believe something is unbreakable because of what they know they are capable of. But that doesn't make what they are capable of questionable or false. And you are clearly ignoring writers intent.

Gotcha. So I'm ignoring writers intent even though you're ignore writers intent with the Hulk and Gladiator ft? We are either come to come to a conclusion and accept everything here or we are going to keep debating this. Hulk destroyed something with ease that can withstand ANY pressure and temperature. Gladiator ripped a black hole apart with his hands. Superman destroyed chains that can carry suns, etc...

OOOOORRRRR, everything above is hyperbole. Choose!!!

Originally posted by h1a8
You are assuming here.
1st white holes are not proven to exist, so there is no actual science on them. So in fiction, they can have more pressure than a black hole can if the writer wanted.
2nd, absorbing something requires more pressure than releasing is a false statement.

3rd, when people mention black holes they are referring to the event horizon (a region of space), not the singularity in the center (which is the size of an atom). Inside the event, the pressure is less than stellar. But when you get infinitesimally close to the singularity then the pressure would exceed stellar amount.

Carver should get reported by naming BM. He doesn't even have a planetary feat, let alone a stellar feat.

Superman didnt break unbreakable chains. That would be a contradiction. The chains were not unbreakable because they were broken. Yes, stating that they are unbreakable is hyperbole. The feat is what the chains are capable of doing. That's what we are going by, not the unbreakable stance.

Good so you agree that the statement "any pressure" is false when shown otherwise.

1. Yes, White Holes aren't proven to exist. Right, but the writer didn't say that they're powerful than a Black Hole.
2. Absorbing something requires more power, there are many characters who struggle absorbing certain level of Power, but don't have any problems in releasing said power.
One of the simplest examples are humans, our body takes hours to absorb the proteins and energy or whatever from food, but can emit and spend that energy within 30 seconds.
3. Wrong, A Black Hole is a Black Hole, they aren't only famous for their event horizon. What makes them interesting is there Singularity, where laws of physics cease to operate and what happens after it.
4. Writer didn't low-ball anything. Just breaking those chains alone is helluva impressive, regardless whether they haul them at normal or FTL speeds. He made them go from galaxies to galaxies because Galaxies consist of STAR'S'. A Star System, most of the times, consists of only a single Star. The writer was talking about STAR'S, not STAR, that's why he chose Galaxies, which consist of many of them, over Star Systems, which mostly contain only one of them.
5. How's it a hyperbole? Because it sounds illogical? Exceeding the speed of light is illogical too, but nobody calls it a hyperbole. This is fiction, if some Humans can get Multiversal powers from some wierd experiments, then Black Holes can be tore apart too.

Originally posted by MrMind
an unimpressive feat from a non canon book, dunno why he brought it up, that wasn't even a sun, it was bigger than the planet but do you realize how big star is compare to even the biggest sized planet?

Can you point me to where it's stated to be non-canon?

When did we start judging based on artistic scaling?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Can you point me to where it's stated to be non-canon?

When did we start judging based on artistic scaling?

it didn't even say it's a sun, it's just a giant fireball. so what relevance is this feat in relation to stars pulling chains?

now don't make me repeat the third time

how on earth does this feat explain surfer can break chains that pull billions of suns from one galaxy to another?