this fictional logic implies that the universes exerted a large force on those two planets .. hence why they crumbled when an opposing force (Hyperion) held them apart .... it ignores the planets moving in the space around them .. instead it glues them as a focal point and one unit to the universes.
clear. as. day. and common sense. you got schooled and now repeating points i already addressed. engage me when you come with up something relevant i didn't debunk already , i'll be back
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
We don't share feats, sorry.Show the SPECIFIC planets that Hyperion held apart being durable, please.
As you said yourself, the balloons don't burst instantly. So in that incredibly tiny timeframe before the burst, when they are distending, I am holding the planets apart.
It's just that the balloons (and in Hyperions case, the planets) are taking the strain.
Just like I hold two speeding cars apart, until the balloons burst and the cars slam into me. Same principle.
You are holding the front part of the balloon you are in contact with apart due to flexibility. The rest of the balloon will continue to move forward. The entire Earth's are stopped due to no flexibility. The rest of the universes would have to stop behind them.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
this fictional logic implies that the universes exerted a large force on those two planets .. hence why they crumbled when an opposing force (Hyperion) held them apart .... it ignores the planets moving in the space around them .. instead it glues them as a focal point and one unit to the universes.
Bingo!
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
because it's fictional science ... and they were durable enough to handle some force for a few moments. It doesn't get any clearer than this.the writer himself approved.
It WON'T held your pain getting debunked like this. 😂 😂
Few moments?
Please point out where it says this in the comic?
It's a durability feat for Hyperion - not a strength feat. He's more durable than a planet, sure. Just like I am more durable than a balloon.
The writer himself approves that this is a Superman worthy feat. Is that your understanding too?
To Hulkster: you still haven't answered my question :]
Originally posted by TheHulkster
You are holding the front part of the balloon you are in contact with apart due to flexibility. The rest of the balloon will continue to move forward. The entire Earth's are stopped due to no flexibility. The rest of the universes would have to stop behind them.
Actually, they would have some flexibility. Even a lump of solid iron would distort if you throw enough force behind it - that's the principle of cold forging.
Originally posted by carver9
It can withstand ANY temperature, ANY pressure.https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/51398037/SmartSelect_20200317-183023_Chrome.jpg.html
Hulk proceeds to rip through it. Also, the guy that is saying this is a scientist, lol, so he knows about black holes and suns.
That's like calling something unbreakable then it gets broke to prove the statement was false.
FYI, the pressure of suns and black holes is LESS than a stellar weight pressed on top of you, and certainly less than trillions of stellar weights.
Originally posted by h1a8
Hyperbole. Obviously it can't withstand any temperature or any pressure.That's like calling something unbreakable then it gets broke to prove the statement was false.
FYI, the pressure of suns and black holes is LESS than a stellar weight pressed on top of you, and certainly less than trillions of stellar weights.
😂 ...you just proved my point. The chains Superman broke doesnt have any fts, it's basically statements and it was called unbreakable chains. Both showings are hyperbole. Both of them. This is why I said everyone on the list can pull this ft off.
BM is a definete no. He hasnt done anything strengthwise that woyld make me think twice. The others have some ridic otherworldly shiet that theyve done.
And im only putting Thanos as a yes because he's always written above the ones on the list.
Sentry is... I dont know. He is all over the place. So yes for him too. Wutever.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
BM is a definete no. He hasnt done anything strengthwise that woyld make me think twice. The others have some ridic otherworldly shiet that theyve done.
And im only putting Thanos as a yes because he's always written above the ones on the list.
Sentry is... I dont know. He is all over the place. So yes for him too. Wutever.
Are you talking about Thor moving the world engine?
😄
Originally posted by carver9
😂 ...you just proved my point. The chains Superman broke doesnt have any fts, it's basically statements and it was called unbreakable chains. Both showings are hyperbole. Both of them. This is why I said everyone on the list can pull this ft off.
No it's not the same.
The chains he broke are used to haul stars across galaxies. That's their feat.
Resisting ANY temperature and ANY pressure is hyperbole.
Like having a car that's used to drive from A to B. That's not hyperbole. Saying it's the FASTEST car in the world, or the prettiest, or the best - that's hyperbole.
Originally posted by h1a8
Hyperbole. Obviously it can't withstand any temperature or any pressure.That's like calling something unbreakable then it gets broke to prove the statement was false.
FYI, the pressure of suns and black holes is LESS than a stellar weight pressed on top of you, and certainly less than trillions of stellar weights.
Gladiator is the weakest of them (excluding Blue Marvel), and he tore apart a Black hole once.
and Where was it shown that an inverted Black Hole is even close to what you mentioned
If the pressure of Black Holes is less than a Stellar Weight, then how was the material of those chains manipulated under the pressure of an inverted Black hole?
A Black Hole should be logically stronger than a White Hole, because it absorbs, whereas a White Hole emits.
Absorbing something requires more pressure than releasing said thing.
