Can World Breaker Hulk break the chains in Up and the Sky?

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
So everything happening in the comics is capable of happening in real life?
So they don't live in a world where alien was able to shrink whole cities and keep it's inhabitants in a space in his ship where they continued to live their lives?
It's not a universe where there's an extradimensonal overlord that turns planets into exploding fire pits and travel through wormholes generated by a living machine box?
It's not a universe where there's a whole dude that travels through mirrors using a modified "laser" pistol or a dude with a stick can control localized patches of weather?
It's science fiction, you can't ignore the fiction because it doesn't fit your narrative. The shit isn't a legit quantifiable feat because the writer himself wasn't trying to create one beyond Superman overcomes a villain that says he can't. It's all bullshit beyond that.

the chains were forged in some shit that not even light would be able to get into, something that's consistently pushing matter out.
What's the calc how a white hole would forge something?
Would you place something at the end of it while it's pounded with matter?
Can you explain it in anyway that would create a more conclusive argument?

Let me know. No amount of head canon from you or the superman camp is going to change THE fact that it's unquantifiable, period.

By this argument, Superman rips Wolverines un-quantifiable comic book metal bones in half.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
You two will ignore the fact that a throwaway villain had a solid enough invasion force and apparently was towing stars via "we don't know" just to come to that conclusion then say that. The shit isn't irrelevant because it's an unknown variable that's there that you can't figure out to at least give it an as close to definitive answer that fiction allows then it's clear that's your aim.

Originally posted by abhilegend
A throwaway villain saying is a lie, Mandrakk saying it is a lie and you're the paragon of truth.

That "throwaway villian" is the primary antagonist. His kidnapping a child and Supermans quest to rescue her is literally the entire series.

Calling him a "throwaway villian" is laughable. As laughable as calling Thanos a throwaway villian of Infinity Gauntlet.

Originally posted by cdtm
That "throwaway villian" is the [b]primary antagonist. His kidnapping a child and Supermans quest to rescue her is literally the entire series.

Calling him a "throwaway villian" is laughable. As laughable as calling Thanos a throwaway villian of Infinity Gauntlet. [/B]

He had DC earth minus Superman defeated.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
You two will ignore the fact that a throwaway villain had a solid enough invasion force and apparently was towing stars via "we don't know" just to come to that conclusion then say that. The shit isn't irrelevant because it's an unknown variable that's there that you can't figure out to at least give it an as close to definitive answer that fiction allows then it's clear that's your aim.

So youre going by the unknown possibly non existent variables over what is told on panel in the comic instead.

This site is a comics message board where we discuss what happens in the comic book not what you think happened because of some unknown variables.
Thats how you debate, no wonder you never won a BZ.

Originally posted by cdtm
By this argument, Superman rips Wolverines un-quantifiable comic book metal bones in half.

Except The difference between adamantium and this metal is it's a proven boast on the chains end and true adamantium has a clear cut explanation that it has no molecular flaws in its bonds to break. Nobody has broken it without some sort of ****ery being the catalyst like magic, the power cosmic, or molecular manipulation.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Albert was arguing that since we have inertia, the chains that haul stars between galaxies aren't actually all that, as once you accelerate anything in space (be it a pebble, a rock, a planet or a star) you could haul it around with a human hair or w/ever.

😐

Originally posted by carver9
😂

They are discussing the chain ft. Some are saying the person who was talking about the chain isn't reliable because he lied throughout the comic and others are saying even though he is a compulsive liar, we still can't ignore what he said about the chains.

Yeah... except that people weren't asked to deconstruct the feat. They were asked if the characters could replicate it. So you lot are way off topic.

People need to get back on topic.

Originally posted by Diesldude
So youre going by the unknown possibly non existent variables over what is told on panel in the comic instead.

This site is a comics message board where we discuss what happens in the comic book not what you think happened because of some unknown variables.
Thats how you debate, no wonder you never won a BZ.

YOU are going by an unknown conclusion both clear unknown variables.
it's just vague. Saying it's involved in a process doesn't tell you what the other parts of that process is.
Yes we are on a forum where we discuss what happens in a comic book. That doesn't mean we ignore all other available info.

^^^

look at this guy accusing me of using unknown variable and then says we can’t ignore all other available info. Like shrunken cities, FTl travel smh what moron. Youre confuse Alberto, you’re arguing against yourself.

All that “other info” is the unknown variables you twit. I’m going by on panel statement that the chains are used to haul stars.

What does haul mean to you?

In the case of some chains haul would mean it was between a propulsion object and a carrying/holding object.
Do chains float through the air on their own?

I'll wait.

Originally posted by cdtm
That "throwaway villian" is the [b]primary antagonist. His kidnapping a child and Supermans quest to rescue her is literally the entire series.

Calling him a "throwaway villian" is laughable. As laughable as calling Thanos a throwaway villian of Infinity Gauntlet. [/B]

I think he means that we’ll never see that villain ever again as it was just created for that story alone

Thanos was a force well before he collected the stones. Don’t ever disrespect the mad titan like that.

I want to see the step-mom! Doxx doxx doxx!

Originally posted by Diesldude
^^^

look at this guy accusing me of using unknown variable and then says we can’t ignore all other available info. Like shrunken cities, FTl travel smh what moron. Youre confuse Alberto, you’re arguing against yourself.

All that “other info” is the unknown variables you twit. I’m going by on panel statement that the chains are used to haul stars.

What does haul mean to you?

The thing here is that Banner hold unlimited control of the source of his powers, which dwarves stars by comparison. Could writers write Hulk to that level? Of course.

"Did you lose another debate? Well time for your punishment stepson!"

RELEASE THE WEDDING CERTIFICATE

GIVE STEPMOMMY A BACKRUB WHILE SHE SPEAKS TO THE MAN IN CHARGE OF THE WEBSITE

Originally posted by One Big Mob
I want to see the step-mom! Doxx doxx doxx!

👆

Originally posted by Stoic
The thing here is that Banner hold unlimited control of the source of his powers, which dwarves stars by comparison. Could writers write Hulk to that level? Of course.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
In the case of some chains haul would mean it was between a propulsion object and a carrying/holding object.
Do chains float through the air on their own?

I'll wait.

This is the problem that some of you have, you are trying to apply real world physics to comic book story, some would find that very laughable, just remember and recognize it for what it really is, fantasy entertainment.