The whole time 🤦🏿‍♂️ We're talking about the fraudulent boast that they're unbreakable and you dudes are STILL repeating "bUt tHeY hAuL sTaRz..."
Yeah. We get that. That's not the BASIS for this being a FEAT.
The basis for this being a somewhat dope feat is his claim that they're unbreakable. The superman camp already conceded MY point that dude clearly had no real frame of reference for the strength of the chains or robots. That is and always has been my only point.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilit’s not even a victory. you sound like you won a marathon. You 3 are known to lie, carver just stated that Superman was using super speed against mighto. I can bring up other examples. And you link to stuff that counter your argument as proof in your debate. Misremembering something isn’t the same as outright lying like you 3 do all the time with out of context scans.
When did i take credit? I said "somebodys" I didn't say "I had"😂 😂 You're over here getting emotional cause your comprehension skills is terrible
Originally posted by Diesldude
Alberto is guy that says a star is weightless in space and is jizzing all over this thread because I misremembered something. 😂 I guess it’s a small victory for him that I’m not infallible.
He's never won a single BZ and he ran from my BZ challenge to him about Supermans moot feat.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
If the guy was a liar or too stupid to understand how powerful earth heroes are (the book proves it clearly) then nothing he claimed is valid. YOU'RE arguing mechanism and I'm like it's irrelevant if his claims were trash. And they were. sTrOnGeR aNd fAsTer tHaN yOu... uNbReAkAbLe... Yeah okAny other feat, in other time, any other character, the feat would need references from other books. This doesn't? It's just true cuz the guy said so... Riiiiight. Not.
However, we must remain objective and admit that extrapolating such conclusions to the internal world of comics would constitute a logical fallacy. Indeed, the fact that even a hyper-advanced being capable of literally astronomical feats cannot fathom the true power of Superman is a valid counter-example.
Originally posted by Magnon
I find myself somewhat sympathetic to your claim that a being who underestimates Superman must necessarily be a liar and stupid; after all, we have plenty of examples of such beings on these very forums.However, we must remain objective and admit that extrapolating such conclusions to the internal world of comics would constitute a logical fallacy. Indeed, the fact that even a hyper-advanced being capable of literally astronomical feats cannot fathom the true power of Superman is a valid counter-example.
He didnt just underestimate Superman, he flat out lied. He said that the robots were more powerful than Superman and beyond Superman comprehension but Hawkman along with other leaguers were one shotting them.
Originally posted by Magnon
I find myself somewhat sympathetic to your claim that a being who underestimates Superman must necessarily be a liar and stupid; after all, we have plenty of examples of such beings on these very forums.However, we must remain objective and admit that extrapolating such conclusions to the internal world of comics would constitute a logical fallacy. Indeed, the fact that even a hyper-advanced being capable of literally astronomical feats cannot fathom the true power of Superman is a valid counter-example.
um hawkman and Adam strange were beating on and breaking them down them for an hour straight. Yes, he lied. Which was shown on panel, I posted that scan too many times.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Superman breaking some chains were invalidated the moment he broke them even though the character mentioning it was invalidated the moment he said the robots were stronger than superman while hawkman and Adam strange were beating on and breaking them down them for an hour straight.We know he can break shit. He's Superman. The feat is only valid if we have a true reference for the strength of the chains. We don't. For all we know, Nth metal could be stronger. We really don't know so if it can't be quantified, it's not a relevant feat. It's just Superman being Superman, Nothing more, nothing less.
If Superman lifts a truck then did he lift more than 1 ton although you don't know exactly how much the truck weighs?
Of course. Same thing here. The chains are capable of withstanding MORE than millions of stellar weights of force. So we can lowball the feat and say 1 million stellar weights.
Originally posted by h1a8
If Superman lifts a truck then did he lift more than 1 ton although you don't know exactly how much the truck weighs?Of course. Same thing here. The chains are capable of withstanding MORE than millions of stellar weights of force. So we can lowball the feat and say 1 million stellar weights.
No we can't. Because the chains aren't lifting a star. We covered this. They're pulling in object in zero G. It's just not as impressive as y'all wanna act like it is.