Here's inertia: an object in motion or at rest will remain in that state unless acted upon by an outside force. In zero G, unless hit by a comet or caught in a gravitational field, the lightest nudge required to start an object moving is sufficient to keep it moving in a straight line theoretically forever.
Originally posted by Diesldude
so you dont know? Or understand the reason why I asked. Should i dumb it down for you?
What does that have to do with the fact that in zero G I can move an object exponentially more massive than myself? You're undervaluing the fact that moving a thing in space is ridiculously easier than overcoming gravity AND that once moving, an object in space requires no force to keep it moving.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
What does that have to do with the fact that in zero G I can move an object exponentially more massive than myself? You're undervaluing the fact that moving a thing in space is ridiculously easier than overcoming gravity AND that once moving, an object in space requires no force to keep it moving.
You are aware that the sun is already in motion, right?
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
PR when are you going to talk to To the Step Mom?
When she contacts me, I guess.
For perspective: Astronauts on the moon, which actually has gravity can jump many times their height and length. Now remove gravity completely. Why is it so hard to understand lack of gravity seriously lowers the power threshold for moving objects? It's like you're intentionally trying to wiggle around this VERY relevant fact.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Ok, and? The entire universe is moving in one way or another. What does any of this have to do with Zero Gravity Objects Move With Ease?
It doesn't, but neither does the sun. I'm just wondering what the actual argument is as I'm not sure what you guys are getting at.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvillook bro I’m gonna try to be nice with you and I can see why you’re saying that in zero gravity of space everything is weightless and you can push and pull big objects. Like a tug boat pulling mega yachts in water. But your talking pulling a star that has its own gravitational pull. It’s not going to want to be moved out of it’s orbit. You’re gonna need strong engines to pull it and something strong to pull it with. Those chains gotta withstand the heat, pull of the star moving at superspeed in one direction and the ship pulling it in another at faster than light. Those chains are under immense tension to snap, break but they don’t because they are that strong.
Ok, and? The entire universe is moving in one way or another. What does any of this have to do with Zero Gravity Objects Move With Ease?
Also, while this is admittedly an assumption, why would you believe the chains themselves touch the sun? That's dumb. Does the star have a hitch our loops to thread a chain through. It's almost obvious that some other device holds the star and the chains are hooked to that device at one end and to whatever is providing motile force on the other end
I wish I could see in y'all dudes heads to how y'all actually picture this happening, because based on you guys reasoning y'all are picturing something hilariously stupid like wrapping the chains around the actual star itself. Even if it wasn't a star, believing any chain is securely wrapped around a glove shaped object is retarded as ****. Clearly there's a harness of sort holding the star which the chains are hooked to. It's ****ing physics 😂😂😂😂
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Also, while this is admittedly an assumption, why would you believe the chains themselves touch the sun? That's dumb. Does the star have a hitch our loops to thread a chain through. It's almost obvious that some other device holds the star and the chains are hooked to that device at one end and to whatever is providing motile force on the other end
Speculation, not based on the comic.