Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Not in my life, personally, but Mohammad's legacy has sown plenty of misery across the world over the last 1000+ years.
Holy Prophet (PBUH) brought an end to backward warring pagan tribes who were known to bury newborn daughters alive as well as practice racism, and reorganized them into a civilization in its own right.
So you are telling me that it is acceptable for Europeans to create civilizations but not for Asians? This is height of bigotry on your part.
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Funny you should say that, considering that Mohammad was a morally bankrupt, hypocritical imperialist. While most Western leaders, on the other hand, did a great deal to combat imperialism and have made tremendous strides in de-colonization in the last 100 years. Hell, even the American support for the Taliban was largely to combat Soviet imperialism.
Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was/is much better than any leader your kind produced in modern times. He managed to reform backward warring pagans of his time and produced first Arab civilization with a charter of Women and Orphan rights and discouraged racism through notion of brotherhood.
American HISTORY is much DARKER, VIOLENT, and DISGUSTING in comparison.
https://www.history.com/news/native-americans-genocide-united-states
When Native Americans Were Slaughtered in the Name of ‘Civilization’
Their skin was dark. Their languages were foreign. And their world views and spiritual beliefs were beyond most white men’s comprehension.
https://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/american-civil-war-history
The Civil War in the United States began in 1861, after decades of simmering tensions between northern and southern states over slavery, states’ rights and westward expansion.
Most Western leaders combating imperialism? Who are these guys again?
https://www.vox.com/2014/6/24/5835320/map-in-the-whole-world-only-these-five-countries-escaped-european
YouTube video
Americans (Foreign settlers in the lands of native Indians to be precise) fought the British Imperialists for independence - localized American agenda.
Many years later, it would be Adolph Hitler who would manage to break the back of European colonialism around the world.
Now check my first post in the following link: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=671894&pagenumber=3
- You will find ample examples of unproductive American interventions in Islamic countries which in turn helped fuel anti-American sentiments, extremism, and ruined the lives of millions of Muslims over the course of years.
USA is just as bad as those whom it derides in official capacity.
Sorry friend - no moral high ground for you.
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Saying hateful, offensive things is still freedom of expression; mocking religious figures is one of the main cornerstones of freedom of expression in the Western world, especially France. So yes, you should be allowed to mock the victims of the Holocaust. Remember, 'hate speech' is still freedom of speech.
Thanks for letting me know.
Hate Speech is disturbing/problematic practice regardless:
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/UN%20Strategy%20and%20Plan%20of%20Action%20on%20Hate%20Speech%2018%20June%20SYNOPSIS.pdf
https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-against-racism-and-intolerance/hate-speech-and-violence
Backwardness of American conception of Freedom of Expression is apparent in the following link: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/hate
You need to do better than that TBH.
You and member Surtur continue to surprise me with your disgusting levels of bigotry.