The intrigue behind Pope Francis' "bombshell" comments on same-sex civil unions

Started by eThneoLgrRnae17 pages
Originally posted by BackFire
In law and government it should be. In your personal life, believe whatever you want as long as those beliefs aren’t pushed on anyone else.

I just accept that you and I are gonna disagree regardless so it's pointless arguing with you.

My view on abortion being wrong has nothing to do with my religious beliefs though. Science itself says it is a human being at conception and thus it has a basic right to life just like everyone else.

The gay "marriage" thing, yeah, I suppose my religious beliefs have a lot to do with that. But I still think it's wrong to force any man of God to violate his own religious beliefs by forcing him to we'd a gay couple.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I just accept that you and I are gonna disagree regardless so it's pointless arguing with you.

My view on abortion being wrong has nothing to do with my religious beliefs though. Science itself says it is a human being at conception and thus it has a basic right to life just like everyone else.

The gay "marriage" thing, yeah, I suppose my religious beliefs have a lot to do with that. But I still think it's wrong to force any man of God to violate his own religious beliefs by forcing him to we'd a gay couple.

*wed* a gay couple.

Couldn't edit for some reason.

Originally posted by Newjak
It will be the work of the Devil and a sign we are heading to the end days.

You think you're funny.... you're not.

@ethneo, so if incest is a sin, why did God create a situation where humans could only populate due to incest?

Originally posted by wxyz
@ethneo, so if incest is a sin, why did God create a situation where humans could only populate due to incest?

*sigh*

You disappoint me, bud.

I thought I had already explained everything well enough.

This is my last attempt at trying to reach you:

When God first created humans there was no law against incest because there was no reason for one.

It was only later on during the time of Moses that restrictions were actually needed against incest because the genetic load among humans had built up so much; which meant that incestuous relationships were then far more likely to cause deformities and more deadly mutations.

@ethneo, sorry to disappoint you.

I'm just not well versed in religion and God.

I'm still not 100% on the incest thing and God, but I can research that on my own time.

Thanks for the discussion.

Well, ok. No problem... think I've probably explained it as well as I can.

@ethneo, still friends? 😁

Of course. 🙂

Internet friends, at least. 😉

Originally posted by wxyz
@ethneo, sorry to disappoint you.

I'm just not well versed in religion and God.

I'm still not 100% on the incest thing and God, but I can research that on my own time.

Thanks for the discussion.

Star's point is very easy: Way back then it was okay to **** your own sister, starting around the time of Moses it became not okay.

So don't be like Ben Shapiro and lust after your own sister:

LOL@Robbie's epic-level trolling.

You wouldn't think someone who voted for that demonic queen b*tch Hillary would trigger Rob so much but apparently he does lol.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
*sigh*

You disappoint me, bud.

I thought I had already explained everything well enough.

This is my last attempt at trying to reach you:

When God first created humans there was no law against incest because there was no reason for one.

It was only later on during the time of Moses that restrictions were actually needed against incest because the genetic load among humans had built up so much; which meant that incestuous relationships were then far more likely to cause deformities and more deadly mutations.

It sounds like you admitted God ****ed up and evolution is real.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
LOL@Robbie's epic-level trolling.

You wouldn't think someone who voted for that demonic queen b*tch Hillary would trigger Rob so much but apparently he does lol.

How is that trolling? I literally explained your "okay back then, not okay now" position in an easy to follow summary of your points.

If you actually think Shapiro voted for Clinton, then lolz all around on you. I don't think you do.

Originally posted by Robtard
How is that trolling? I literally explained your "okay back then, not okay now" position in an easy to follow summary of your points.

If you actually think Shapiro voted for Clinton, then lolz all around on you. I don't think you do.

He did, dummy. That has been confirmed.

You can keep denying it just like you deny that Richard Spencer endorsed Biden all you want.

Only one person trolling for reaction in this thread.

Spoiler:
star

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
He did, dummy. That has been confirmed.

You can keep denying it just like you deny that Richard Spencer endorsed Biden all you want.

*reported*

Originally posted by Robtard
Star's point is very easy: Way back then it was okay to **** your own sister, starting around the time of Moses it became not okay.

So don't be like Ben Shapiro and lust after your own sister:

Did he really say that?

That's kind of weird. Never had the urge to steal the underwear of anyone much less from one of my 4 sisters.

Good Ol' Ben.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Only one person trolling for reaction in this thread.
Spoiler:
star

Nah.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
He did, dummy. That has been confirmed.

You can keep denying it just like you deny that Richard Spencer endorsed Biden all you want.

As far as I've found, he's only said he didn't vote for Trump, not that he voted for Clinton. Probably just shilling for Trump again. Try harder.

YouTube video This is from 2016 where he literally calls Hillary "the wicked witch of the west"

Pretty sure that seals the deal he didn't vote for Clinton.