Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Pretty much 😂 it's literally just another day for him. GS, you're taking time out of your own Christmas to go argue with a guy who is probably at work and is getting paid to reply to you lol.
Nah we just playing.
A bit of smack talk doesn't hurt anybody.
Plus i don't celebrate Xmas. So i've got time. Just another day for me. 😉
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Oh dear.I was waiting for you to bring up the Alien Entity and his lone appearance in continuity before never being seen or referred to again
Is that our new criteria based on your nonsense?
Its said in your scans that reality was triggered by their desire to understand:[B]"Are you saying that, we, you and i, that our desire to understand was the spark that lit the fire of creation"
One less showing of Big Bang without the phoenix force, how many are these now?
What would go on to be revealed in the next issue was that in this one time interpretation from like 10yrs ago, that was never supported or adopted by any official source ever since, be that comic books or handbooks, this story says that Eternitys desire to understand itself, to understand the meaning of life was the spark that triggered the Big Bang.
Its not the only source. Entropy also did the same.
Oh look, another big bang without any mention of phoenix force. How many are there , eh?
Reed and the Alien Entity are beings of the universe, aspects of the chronal axis that Eternity embodies. So by travelling back in time to the pre-Big Bang void and asking "WHY?" just as Eternity did (in this interpretation,) they were able to trigger the Big Bang event the same as he did.Whats significant is
1) its stated explicitly that they merely acted as triggers, the questions the Alien had created the spark and this then triggered the Big Bang. So again a depiction of a trigger. Zero depiction or re-assignment of the role of Big Bang/energies of creation to another being. Just multiple triggers for it and thats fine. No ones saying the Phoenix Force triggered the Big Bang. However what is being said is it IS those energies.
Wrong again, Alien Entity flat out said that its his energy which is creating the big bang.
2) You deceitfully havent put this incident into context by referring to the next issue which unfortunately for you i have knowledge of
We are only talking about big bang idiot.
3) As you highlighted earlier this week the current continuity trigger for the Big Bang is Galans ship colliding with the Alpha/Omega object that contained the Big Bang.
And which is not related to Phoenix Force at all.
So this incident, that you spent all this time posting about, that you didnt even interpret correctly (a running theme 😱 ) unfortunately for you and your cause is whats actually been retconned LMAO 😆 [/B]
Which retconned that Big Bang is Phoenix Force. Your scan fortunately doesn't tell anything about sentience of big bang. The energy of creation are big bang/phoenix.
He gets proven wrong anyway.
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
So once again, your poor comprehension skills, deficient research and tendency to post out of context evidence in an effort to fool the forum has been highlighted.Its a daily occurrence 😆
The clocks still ticking b**ch 😱 😆
I'll be happy to kick your ass until the end of time.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Is that our new criteria based on your nonsense?One less showing of Big Bang without the phoenix force, how many are these now?
Its not the only source. Entropy also did the same.
Oh look, another big bang without any mention of phoenix force. How many are there , eh?
Wrong again, Alien Entity flat out said that its his energy which is creating the big bang.
We are only talking about big bang idiot.
And which is not related to Phoenix Force at all.
Which retconned that Big Bang is Phoenix Force. Your scan fortunately doesn't tell anything about sentience of big bang. The energy of creation are big bang/phoenix.
He gets proven wrong anyway.
Nope. The Alien Entity states clear as day that his question on the meaning of life was a spark that triggered the Big Bang.
The points made explicitly so it isnt open for debate. 😄
The next issue puts that Big Bang into context and confirms my interpretation. So your selective presentation of evidence is deceitful and a sign that you cant be trued.
Youve now shown a scene of Genis Vell triggering another Big Bang by blowing up Entropy who is a manifestation of the endpoint of Eternity. The heat death of reality.
Can you show us where its stated specifically in those scans that another entity embodies the Big Bang/energies of creation and not just another triggering of the Big Bang? We're getting bored here Abhi.
The forum is waiting!! 😱
This is still very relevant:
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
As i said before, i dont need to go into a back and forth over that point. It doesnt matter to my argue and it doesnt help yours. Youre just filling up the page with nonsense to bury the posts where i highlighted you have nothing 😆Please show us all a scan that states explicitly that another entity is the energies of creation, that another entity embodies the Big Bang.
[B]NO
scans of something triggering the Big Bang (after all no is arguing that Phoenix triggers Big Bangs)NO scans of someone referencing the energies of creation or Big Bang without stating explicitly to be it or embody it
NO scans of a Big Bang happening coupled with your supposition and side commentary "oh it doesn't mention Phoenixes name so its not the Big Bang" It is after all stated in continuity that Phoenix is the Big Bang already. So unless a story is about the Phoenix then a generic visual depiction of the Big Bang event doesnt have to refer to the Phoenix. Just like a generic depiction of the 616 universe doesnt have to mention Eternity if the story isnt about him. Not referring to it does not signify a retcon.
SHOW US an explicit and in continuity reference of another entity being given the role of embodying energies of creation today or you forfeit the argument 😆 [/B]
Show the forum Abhi!!!
You've had nearly 2 weeks and have still failed to show in continuity scans demonstrating another entity being assigned the role of embodying the energies of creation or Big Bang.
By tomorrow afternoon your 24hrs is up, you will automatically concede and your views on this topic will be irrelevant forevermore 😆
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Nope. The Alien Entity states clear as day that his question on the meaning of life was a spark that triggered the Big Bang.
You can't read, can you?
"The light, it came from within me".
The points made explicitly so it isnt open for debate.
Haha, it is explicitly Entity's light which created the big bang.
The next issue puts that Big Bang into context and confirms my interpretation. So your selective presentation of evidence is deceitful and a sign that you cant be trued.
Why don't you post the scans which actually show what happened? Too chicken?
Youve now shown a scene of Genis Vell triggering another Big Bang by blowing up Entropy who is a manifestation of the endpoint of Eternity. The heat death of reality.
And not a phoenix force mention in sight. Its not heat death moron, its the big bang.
Can you show us where its stated specifically in those scans that another entity embodies the Big Bang/energies of creation and not just another triggering of the Big Bang? We're getting bored here Abhi.
Triggering the big bang? Its the big bang my idiot friend, created by Entropy and his own energy (no phoenix force in sight)
The forum is waiting!! 😱
😂
Is this what you are going to do? Kick your ass in every post, you pretending it did not happen and ask for more ass kicking?
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
This is still very relevant:
Now post one big bang which actually shows Phoenix Force creating it. You are riding on one statement from Reed till now. Post Phoenix Force actually doing it.
Or get reported for spamming.
Originally posted by abhilegend
You can't read, can you?"The light, it came from within me".
Haha, it is explicitly Entity's light which created the big bang.
Why don't you post the scans which actually show what happened? Too chicken?
And not a phoenix force mention in sight. Its not heat death moron, its the big bang.
Triggering the big bang? Its the big bang my idiot friend, created by Entropy and his own energy (no phoenix force in sight)
😂
Is this what you are going to do? Kick your ass in every post, you pretending it did not happen and ask for more ass kicking?
I can read perfectly. The difference is i read and take into consideration the whole scan and not just a selective out of context part that i can swing to support my agenda 😆
The end part of the sentence is "It came from a question. Was born in the fire of our need to understand"
So as i stated previously, the question was what generated the spark. The Alien Entity states that explicitly so you are in no position to say otherwise.
Reed then has it confirmed by the Alien Entity that this question was merely the spark/trigger for the Big Bang:
Conclusively yet another trigger and ZERO. Let me repeat ZERO reference to any being taking the role of embodiment of the energies of creation. So the evidence doesnt do what you need it do.
Furthermore as i revealed earlier today this one off interpretation of a trigger for the Big Bang was retconned anyway. So its completely useless evidence.
You try so hard and yet FAIL at every turn ✅
Originally posted by abhilegend
How many times are you going to spam the same thing after I posted so many big bang scenes with no phoenix force in sight?Now post one big bang which actually shows Phoenix Force creating it. You are riding on one statement from Reed till now. Post Phoenix Force actually doing it.
Or get reported for spamming.
I post it because it highlights the point that a generic depiction of the Big Bang occurring doesn't need to mention the name Phoenix Force just like a depiction of the 616 universe doesnt need to mention Eternitys name unless the stories about him.
Its already stated in continuity multiple times that Phoenix is the embodiment of the Big Bang/Energies of creation so why would the Phoenix have to get a shoutout for every depiction of a Big Bang if the story isnt a Phoenix story? bangin
The quote i keep posting is a reminder of this point, a reminder that you keep saying the same countered shit and instead of showing the forum the evidence you need to show, (AN EXPLICIT REFERENCE TO A NEW ENTITY BEING ASSIGNED AS EMBODIMENT OF THE BIG BANG/ENERGIES OF CREATION) you keep repeating the same strategy showing multiple different triggers.
We're still waiting 😱