Gladiator vs Hyperion

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Doesn't Gladiator contain this half solar system destroying nova level blast?

https://m.imgur.com/a/1xBscAj

He contained it to the point that another star was created.

I thought off panel feats don't count, carvturd

why doesn't Orion's solar system feat count?

Originally posted by carver9
Orion ft is hyperbolic and off panel. It's deserving of ignoring. Do you think Orion can produce Shockwaves from a single punch strong enough to melt Hercules and Aquaman if he clashed with an equal? Think about it and be honest.

Originally posted by MrMind
I thought off panel feats don't count, carvturd

why doesn't Orion's solar system feat count?

Gladiator ft happened on panel. Orions didn't.

Originally posted by carver9
Gladiator ft happened on panel. Orions didn't.

It happened off panel. That's the reason why we don't actually know what exactly happened or what Gladiator did.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Doesn't Gladiator contain this half solar system destroying nova level blast?

https://m.imgur.com/a/1xBscAj

Did he shield the blast with his body? We dont actually know what he did. At best sounds like a durability feat against energy projection. Not a strength feat.

Originally posted by carver9
Yep, he's done it before.

He collapsed a star with his bare hands before? Issue number please

Originally posted by Stoic
His son said that he saw him do it. That isn't hyperbole it's a direct statement by an eye witness. It happened.

So did Spidey saying Sentry stalemating Galactus. But we all know where that went here on Kmc.

Originally posted by Booya_69
Through writers intent on multiple occasions. Yes, he’s physically contained an explosion that would have destroyed half the solar system.

Originally posted by JBL
Yes he has.

What was it that >= collapsing a star in one's hand

We don't need to know how he contained it. Just that he did. I hope nobody is trying to claim he tanked the blast without any side-effects, though. That would be pretty dishonest.

Originally posted by -Pr-
We don't need to know how he contained it. Just that he did. I hope nobody is trying to claim he tanked the blast without any side-effects, though. That would be pretty dishonest.

Nope, he didn't tank it, but, Gladiator had nothing on him and the proof is up to the person saying he did have something on him to show it. It was said that he contained it and it was also mentioned that a star was born. All done under his own power.

Originally posted by carver9
Nope, he didn't tank it, but, Gladiator had nothing on him and the proof is up to the person saying he did have something on him to show it. It was said that he contained it and it was also mentioned that a star was born. All done under his own power.

"A star was born" is flavour-text, trying to show off the magnitude of an explosion.

Explosions aren't how stars are created.

Originally posted by -Pr-
"A star was born" is flavour-text, trying to show off the magnitude of an explosion.

Explosions aren't how stars are created.

He contained it to the point of a star being created near Mars. They actually showed the star before he flew off to Earth.

Originally posted by carver9
He contained it to the point of a star being created near Mars. They actually showed the star before he flew off to Earth.

That's not how stars are made.

They showed the explosion. We don't see an actual star. And, unless I'm mistaken, Reed says nothing about a sun/star being created.

John Byrne isn't an idiot, so it was either flavour-text, or incredibly bad writing because he was having an off-day. Pick one.

So we're back to saying 616 Marvel Earth has two suns. Ok.

Originally posted by -Pr-
We don't need to know how he contained it. Just that he did. I hope nobody is trying to claim he tanked the blast without any side-effects, though. That would be pretty dishonest.

Originally posted by JBL
What side-effects did he have that was caused by that explosion?

He was out of it enough to think the Fantastic Four were Skrulls. It says as much in the next issue (FF 250).

Originally posted by -Pr-
He was out of it enough to think the Fantastic Four were Skrulls. It says as much in the next issue (FF 250).

You are mistaken. Glads says it's from the previous encounter, the editor notes it's #249, and moreover he fought the FF BEFORE he met the Skrull X-Men (who used the rads).

He said his first encounter. The explosion was his second encounter I believe.

Originally posted by JBL
He said his first encounter. The explosion was his second encounter I believe.

Nope. The notes clearly state that it was the events in the previous issue, i.e. #249 that they're talking about.

In #249, all the Skrulls did was explode all over him.

Originally posted by h1a8
It happened off panel. That's the reason why we don't actually know what exactly happened or what Gladiator did.

Did he shield the blast with his body? We dont actually know what he did. At best sounds like a durability feat against energy projection. Not a strength feat.

He collapsed a star with his bare hands before? Issue number please

So did Spidey saying Sentry stalemating Galactus. But we all know where that went here on Kmc.

What was it that >= collapsing a star in one's hand

And the chains feat happened off panel, we don't know how they were "hauled" etc it was a ****ing statement but that's acceptable to you. You're one of the biggest hypocrites i know flat out.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
And the chains feat happened off panel, we don't know how they were "hauled" etc it was a ****ing statement but that's acceptable to you. You're one of the biggest hypocrites i know flat out.

Huge hypocrite. It's vomit worthy.

Stones, glass houses etc.