What do you think about same-sex marriage?

Originally posted by BackFire
Long been in favor of it. Never heard a logically sound argument against it.

Not a big fan.

Im married and have been having the same sex for over a decade. I wouldn't recommend it. (Unless my wife reads this, in which case im just kidding and its super awesome)

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!

Spoiler:
nobody answers to god, he's not real

Keep telling yourself that, neo-marxist commie scum. It'll make your kneeling before Him (and yes, you most certainly will, just like everyone else) when He returns all the sweeter. 👆

I'm sure gay couples everywhere are awaiting with bated breath for my opinion on something that has the sum total of f**k all to do with me.

Lawyers and Twitter mobs are standing by.

Originally posted by Raptor22
Not a big fan.

Im married and have been having the same sex for over a decade. I wouldn't recommend it. (Unless my wife reads this, in which case im just kidding and its super awesome)

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Keep telling yourself that, neo-marxist commie scum. It'll make your kneeling before Him (and yes, you most certainly will, just like everyone else) when He returns all the sweeter. 👆

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I'm sure gay couples everywhere are awaiting with bated breath for my opinion on something that has the sum total of f**k all to do with me.

Originally posted by Klaw
I support it.

None of my business, but seeing as we're all being asked: There's no practical reason not to allow it. If two consenting adults want to get married, then so be it.

If the best argument against it is one of religious fanaticism, then it can't be that bad.

Originally posted by -Pr-
None of my business, but seeing as we're all being asked: There's no practical reason not to allow it. If two consenting adults want to get married, then so be it.

If the best argument against it is one of religious fanaticism, then it can't be that bad.

Yeah, that's right, pooty.... just go jerk your pecker some more.

Originally posted by -Pr-
None of my business, but seeing as we're all being asked: There's no practical reason not to allow it. If two consenting adults want to get married, then so be it.

If the best argument against it is one of religious fanaticism, then it can't be that bad.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
People who wanna engage in homosexual acts are free to do so if they like (though they will have to answer to God in the end) but marriage is an entirely different matter.

In the eyes of God, and by extension in the eyes of anyone who truly believes in Him, marriage is between a man and woman only.

God's decree >>>>>>>> any man-made law.

So, do I support "Same sex marriage"? I say there is no such thing as that because it contradicts what God has decreed marriage to be. You might as well ask me if I support leprechauns and vampires lol.

You're ****ing hilarious ethneo

Oh Blakey.... you are the one who believes in magical fairy tale nonsense (that is what Darwinism basically is).

Originally posted by Raptor22
Not a big fan.

Im married and have been having the same sex for over a decade. I wouldn't recommend it. (Unless my wife reads this, in which case im just kidding and its super awesome)

👆

I'd just call it marriage, but yeah, never heard a solid argument against it.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh Blakey.... you are the one who believes in magical fairy tale nonsense (that is what Darwinism basically is).

Do you not see the circular reasoning in that?

circular reasoning is the foundation of religion. after all, it's in the bible, which means it's true.

Originally posted by truejedi
I'd just call it marriage, but yeah, never heard a solid argument against it.

The arguments against it are about as solid as the arguments for the earth being flat.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
circular reasoning is the foundation of religion. after all, it's in the bible, which means it's true.

Originally posted by BackFire
Long been in favor of it. Never heard a logically sound argument against it.

Families definition is pretty sound.

The whole point of breaks is to encourage having kids.

Frankly, the codes should be re-written to allow any couple raising kids as getting those benefits, while childless couples get treated the same way as two strangers rooming together, because there's no real reason for two people living together without any dependants to get any breaks then unmarried strangers.

Originally posted by truejedi
I'd just call it marriage, but yeah, never heard a solid argument against it.