Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
What socialists usually do when you bring up an example of a failed socialist state (which is actually all of the countries that have tried it) is deflect by pointing to supposed shining examples of successful socialist countries.Really though, there are none. As already mentioned, the nordic countries are not actually socialist. Socialism always ends in failure eventually and leaves everyone either dead, starving, or miserable.
Yeah, except that you keep calling me a socialist when I'm not one. Are you not capable of having something at least approaching a grown-up conversation? Or is all you can do snip and snipe so you can come across as being an *******?
Originally posted by ilikecomics
It's addressing the idea the Venezuela failed from anything but communism.The idea it was something done to them by the US is a popular take.
So in your view, if it's not communism or sanctions, what was it ?
Communism and socialism aren't the same thing, so I don't know why you brought that up.
It wasn't the US, though. Even if they contributed (whether they did or not, I can't say), Hugo Chavez and his legitimately stupid reign, and the consequences of which, is why I believe the country is the way it is more than any other factor. And he was no socialist.
Honestly though, I don't know what we're supposed to call him other than a greedy, incompetent imbecile.