Originally posted by tkitna
Hulk wasnt portrayed weak. He just happened to fight a character that was his physical equal or better.
Really? Look at all the things he did. Using car doors as boxing gloves.
Exerting forces on objects with less than 50 tons of force, etc.
Same with Abom. Every action he did measured less than 50 tons of force.
Originally posted by h1a8
Really? Look at all the things he did. Using car doors as boxing gloves.
Exerting forces on objects with less than 50 tons of force, etc.
Same with Abom. Every action he did measured less than 50 tons of force.
He didnt use car doors, he used both halves of a car. One half was the front with the engine and the other half was the rear. Also, where do you pull all of your imaginary numbers up? Froth was right, you need meds bad.
Originally posted by tkitnaOh ok. So part of the front of a car and part of the rear. Look like car doors when I first seen the movie.
He didnt use car doors, he used both halves of a car. One half was the front with the engine and the other half was the rear. Also, where do you pull all of your imaginary numbers up? Froth was right, you need meds bad.
Originally posted by h1a8
Oh ok. So part of the front of a car and part of the rear. Look like car doors when I first seen the movie.
Anyway that shit is weak in comparison to the sub feat.
So for Zod future feats of Superman from other movies count. Yet for Hulk himself his own feats from the very next film he was in doesn't count.
Again this is a timeless loop of endlessly arguing around in circles with your blatant double standards.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
So for Zod future feats of Superman from other movies count. Yet for Hulk himself his own feats from the very next film he was in doesn't count.Again this is a timeless loop of endlessly arguing around in circles with your blatant double standards.
Superman wasn't stronger in BvS.
Hulk was stronger in future films.
This is Abom (not Hulk).
Common sense.
Originally posted by h1a8
Superman wasn't stronger in BvS.
Hulk was stronger in future films.
Why because you say so ?
Kal struggled with an Oil Tanker in MOS, Ergo he was Weaker.
Hulk did not show any clear limits to his strength in TIH. Ergo he was not necessarily weaker.
Originally posted by h1a8
Common sense.
Unfortunately You don't seem to have any.
Originally posted by h1a8
Oh ok. So part of the front of a car and part of the rear. Look like car doors when I first seen the movie.
Anyway that shit is weak in comparison to the sub feat.
You need to lay off of the sub feat. While its a good feat, its nowhere near what your making it out to be. Kudos to Aquaman for being durable and strong enough to not buckle while he steadied the sub as he propelled it up to the surface. Once again, if Aquaman lifted the sub on land, you would have a case.
The Hulk was one shotting Leviathans that were 3 times the size of a submarine and the Abomination was rag dolling the Hulk until he went into rage mode.
Originally posted by h1a8
So why should Abom get Hulks feats from other films. That's stupid as hell.
And yet you use Supermans feats from other films for Zod.
And around and around and around we go spending all eternity trying to get you to see your double standards. But your intellect seems incapable of grasping something so basic.
Originally posted by Darth ThorSuperman wasn't stronger in BvS. If he was i wouldn't. Tell you what. I take the nuke feat away from Zod. Zod still is aircraft bullet proof though.
And yet you use Supermans feats from other films for Zod.And around and around and around we go spending all eternity trying to get you to see your double standards. But your intellect seems incapable of grasping something so basic.
Originally posted by tkitna
How did he operate at a lower strength? He was fighting a physical equal. Its MCU Hulk period,
The things Hulk did independently of Abom showed he was much weaker. Getting struck by lightning and getting damaged. The way he moved and threw objects around. Him using tissue paper to try to hurt an equal (metal chains, car parts, etc).
If Abom was so tough then how can he get strangled by a metal chain? Shouldnt his neck be too tough to squeeze with a chain?
What if someone tried to strangle you with a piece of paper?
You are not using any rational sense.
Originally posted by h1a8
The things Hulk did independently of Abom showed he was much weaker. Getting struck by lightning and getting damaged. The way he moved and threw objects around. Him using tissue paper to try to hurt an equal (metal chains, car parts, etc).If Abom was so tough then how can he get strangled by a metal chain? Shouldnt his neck be too tough to squeeze with a chain?
What if someone tried to strangle you with a piece of paper?You are not using any rational sense.
So basically if there are no alien creatures the size of small skyscrapers or steel vaults to rip out of metal walls in the movie, that automatically means he's unable to perform those feats? Thats how your thinking right? You constantly bring up the metal chain that the Hulk choked the Abomination out with, but refuse to use the context behind it. The Abomination had no chance to break the chain (as so obviously shown during the movie). He was going out at that point. He never once even attempted to break the chain. Instead of concentrating on things you dont understand, try figuring out how Aquaman got KO'd by a grenade launcher if he's so tough.