MI5 worried about online toxic right wing ideology grooming kids on sites like Discor

Started by snowdragon5 pages
Originally posted by Scribble
nah it really does matter tbh, like quite a lot,

You think so, maybe. I mean i get labeled as right on these forums so perhaps I'm just not seeing things your way.

Originally posted by snowdragon
You think so, maybe. I mean i get labeled as right on these forums so perhaps I'm just not seeing things your way.
could be because you aren't part of a group who the right-wing specifically disagree with the very existence of and want to annihilate, idk who knows, maybe,

@snowd

iirc, you've told me you're a Conservative. That would be "Right" in the political spectrum.

Now I do get you've been called "Far-Right" and such, which doesn't seem to be true.

Originally posted by snowdragon
You think so, maybe. I mean i get labeled as right on these forums so perhaps I'm just not seeing things your way.

Perhaps in order to see things his way you should start wearing women's clothing and call yourself a "she" lol. Maybe that will give you the proper perspective. 😂

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Yeah, only a retard would think rejecting leftist bs makes one a fascist. Especially considering the fact that fascism is actually left wing. It's authoritarian.. That alone puts it on the left, though not as far left as totalitarian communism obviously.

The irony of that post when you have Margaret Thatcher of all people in your sig is... well, it's funny.

It's left wing.... nothing you say will convince me otherwise.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Perhaps in order to see things his way you should start wearing women's clothing and call yourself a "she" lol. Maybe that will give you the proper perspective. 😂
this guy has me on ignore and still talks smack, smh haermm

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It's left wing.... nothing you say will convince me otherwise.

Yeah, because being unwilling to listen is totally a positive personality trait.

I have always said that communism, fascism, and naziism are all sister ideologies. They are all authoritarian, they all value the collective more than individuals and their rights, and they are all big government. They are not on opposite ends of the spectrum, sorry.

Maybe they are the opposite of each other with how europeans see the spectrum, but that is a f***ed-up way of looking at it.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I have always said that communism, fascism, and naziism are all sister ideologies. They are all authoritarian, they all value the collective more than individuals and their rights, and they are all big government. They are not on opposite ends of the spectrum, sorry.
haermm

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I have always said that communism, fascism, and naziism are all sister ideologies. They are all authoritarian, they all value the collective more than individuals and their rights, and they are all big government. They are not on opposite ends of the spectrum, sorry.

Maybe they are the opposite of each other with how europeans see the spectrum, but that is a f***ed-up way of looking at it.

If they weren't the opposite of each other in actual practice too, you might have a point. But they are.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Yeah, only a retard would think rejecting leftist bs makes one a fascist. Especially considering the fact that fascism is actually left wing. It's authoritarian.. That alone puts it on the left, though not as far left as totalitarian communism obviously.

Trying to coerce a justice department under your executive power to target journalists who say mean things about you seems pretty authoritarian to me.

Originally posted by -Pr-
What kind of normalisation are you talking about? Because I already feel like we're not gonna see eye to eye on this, but I have to ask out of curiosity.
O.K. I finally have time for a coherant answer for this Pr. Firstly, I think political grooming and sexual grooming are not that different in aims and outcomes. I think a Paedo and an alt-right groomer on a gaming site use many of the same techniques. The outcome for one is dirty chat the full implications are not understood by the child young person. videos and perhaps meeting. The outcome for the other is illicit chat the full implications are not understood by the child young person. propagation of radical ideas and perhaps meeting. Sexualising a child and Radicalising a child are proably very similar. Adults mixing with children without a chaperone is rarely a good idea. What is abnormal is easy to make normal without a framework. Ideas which are sick are easy to normalise in safe spaces. If you propagate a disgust idea enough and fight for it strongly enough it becomes the norm within a group particularly if the older leaders propagate said ideas.

That's all speculation on your part my friend.

When we have actual proof of left wing grooming, such as attempts to normalize "leatherslaves" and other sexual inuendo with children.

Originally posted by cdtm
That's all speculation on your part my friend.

When we have actual proof of left wing grooming, such as attempts to normalize "leatherslaves" and other sexual inuendo with children.

durwank No, it's my observation, leading me to the same conclusion as MI5 who provide proof.

Originally posted by cdtm
That's all speculation on your part my friend.

When we have actual proof of left wing grooming, such as attempts to normalize "leatherslaves" and other sexual inuendo with children.

👆

Yeah like pedophilia lol.

Not to mention how they try to normalize toxic ideologies like marxism lol. Fffs, they are actually brainwashing kids to become racist with this crt crap.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
O.K. I finally have time for a coherant answer for this Pr. Firstly, I think political grooming and sexual grooming are not that different in aims and outcomes. I think a Paedo and an alt-right groomer on a gaming site use many of the same techniques. The outcome for one is dirty chat the full implications are not understood by the child young person. videos and perhaps meeting. The outcome for the other is illicit chat the full implications are not understood by the child young person. propagation of radical ideas and perhaps meeting. Sexualising a child and Radicalising a child are proably very similar. Adults mixing with children without a chaperone is rarely a good idea. What is abnormal is easy to make normal without a framework. Ideas which are sick are easy to normalise in safe spaces. If you propagate a disgust idea enough and fight for it strongly enough it becomes the norm within a group particularly if the older leaders propagate said ideas.

Originally posted by cdtm
That's all speculation on your part my friend.

When we have actual proof of left wing grooming, such as attempts to normalize "leatherslaves" and other sexual inuendo with children.

Lots of people groom. Lots of people indoctrinate. Yes, it does happen on what we would call both sides of the spectrum.

It being "normalised" though? No. Not when society at large still rejects it.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
durwank No, it's my observation, leading me to the same conclusion as MI5 who provide proof.

James Bond is a Conservative 😛

Originally posted by -Pr-
Lots of people groom. Lots of people indoctrinate. Yes, it does happen on what we would call both sides of the spectrum.

It being "normalised" though? No. Not when society at large still rejects it.

Ahh, whilst Society at large rejects it, deviant sub cultures grow and within their ranks it appears normalised. Remember the obvious racism that went on here in the mostly deleted KMC "CULTURE WAR".

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Ahh, whilst Society at large rejects it, deviant sub cultures grow and within their ranks it appears normalised. Remember the obvious racism that went on here in the mostly deleted KMC "CULTURE WAR".

When you have to say "within x group", and that group is an obvious minority, that honestly kills any argument of it being normalised. To me at least.

Which time? We get a lot of racism and intolerance.