Originally posted by FrothByte
IW Ironman was a lot more impressive than Endgame Ironman.
Originally posted by h1a8
Stormbreaker doesn't have the worthy enchantment. So team has a chance if they can separate him from it (maybe use it against him).
Ragnarok Thor was getting the better of Hulk before he had full control of his lightning powers, so even if they could separate him from the axe it wouldn't be a clear cut victory for the team. That's all a moot point since Thor can summon Stormbreaker.
Originally posted by 9jaboy
Aren't they the same though? Sure IW Ironman did good against Thanos but that was a Thanos that wasn't relying on his Strength, Skillsand Blade.
If IW Ironman fought Endgame Thanos it would be pretty much the same imo. What do you think?
IW IM fought a Thanos with 4 Infinity stones and fight him solo at times. That's way more impressive than anything Endgame IM did. You have to remember that Stark probably hasn't fought for 5 years at that point.
Originally posted by Psychotron👆 Thor is beastly.
Ragnarok Thor was getting the better of Hulk before he had full control of his lightning powers, so even if they could separate him from the axe it wouldn't be a clear cut victory for the team. That's all a moot point since Thor can summon Stormbreaker.
Originally posted by FrothByteGood point.
IW IM fought a Thanos with 4 Infinity stones and fight him solo at times. That's way more impressive than anything Endgame IM did. You have to remember that Stark probably hasn't fought for 5 years at that point.
Originally posted by 9jaboy
Good point.
Though you have to consider that Thanos wasn't seriously fighting or meant to kill any of them in Infinity War maybe right until Tony drew blood. And also EndgameThanos used the blade to deflect all their attacks including Energy attacks.
Well, he had just watched himself complete his quest just to get his head chopped off. I imagine he decided against learning the stones power at the same time he fought them. Wanted to make sure he won the fight this time and that would require him using what he is most formidable, comfortable and efficient with..
Entirely an assumption.
In character Thor wins mid to high difficulty
Serious Thor 2 shots.
Bloodlusted one shots the entire battlefield.
Originally posted by 9jaboy
Good point.
Though you have to consider that Thanos wasn't seriously fighting or meant to kill any of them in Infinity War maybe right until Tony drew blood. And also EndgameThanos used the blade to deflect all their attacks including Energy attacks.
Why would you not think Thanos wasn't seriously fighting? Sure he wasn't quite as bloodthirsty as he was in Endgame but her certainly was willing to kill Infinity War. Heck, he killed a whole bunch of Asgardians in the first few minutes of the movie.
As for using his blade to deflect attacks, that's because IM and Thor fought stupidly in Endgame. Had they simply stayed at range and bombarded him with ranged attacks then Thanos would not have been able to block all of them.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Why would you not think Thanos wasn't seriously fighting? Sure he wasn't quite as bloodthirsty as he was in Endgame but her certainly was willing to kill Infinity War. Heck, he killed a whole bunch of Asgardians in the first few minutes of the movie.As for using his blade to deflect attacks, that's because IM and Thor fought stupidly in Endgame. Had they simply stayed at range and bombarded him with ranged attacks then Thanos would not have been able to block all of them.
Its actually not even confirmed that he can deflect Thors lightning. Only IMs repulsors. I know Thor amped IM, but it was still repulsors shots being fired at Thanos, not lightning.
They really needed a scene to justify them fighting up close though against a guy stronger than Hulk, a better warrior than Thor, with a sword as strong as Mjolnir or Stormbreaker.