Originally posted by h1a8
He can defend against any of Thors attacks (force fields, evasion) and can be amped by some of them (lightning). Thor cant spin Stormbreaker around to create a shield. Iron can create weapons that can make Thanos bleed and can stab through Thor.
Originally posted by Silent Master😂
You heard it here folks h1 is claiming Ironman's forcefields can do what a blast from the full IG couldn't. IE stop Stormbreaker.
Originally posted by h1a8Super slow Speeds . As Ironsilver right?
So IM stands there and sees Stormbreaker approaching him at super slow speeds and decides to get hit
Originally posted by 9jaboyIM was hit by a thrown Mjolnir in avengers 1st movie and was fine. That negates the other showing, unless you want to argue that IM was more durable.
Setting aside the fact that Mjolnir (inferior to Stormbreaker) oneshotted Ironman, and Stormbreaker overpowered blast from IG, and can kill Thanos in Oneshot,. How is anything you said supposed to even beat Thor. Loki stabbed Thor- no big deal.
I argued that Stormbreaker won't hit IM. So that argument you posted is irrelevant. IM can make Thanos bleed (who is more durable than Thor) and can stab through Thor (killing him). Stormbreaker moves at super slow speeds in comparison to missiles and such.
IM performance against Thanos proves he will beat Thor.
Originally posted by Silent MasterPretty much since there is no indication he wasn't. Also as proof was him trying to kill CA when CA blocked his hammer slam and leveled the nearby forest.
More proof that H1 is just a troll, he's now claiming that Thor was actually going all out when he fought Iron Man in Avengers
See, even more proof that you haven't actually watched any of the movies. If you had watched the movies you would have known that Thor was more than capable of crushing Iron Man's armor with his bare hands. So the very fact that Thor did not knock Iron Man's head off or cave his chest in is proof that Thor wasn't going all out
Originally posted by Silent MasterStupid logic. Thats not how writers think. We have fiction inconsistency all the time. If Thor wasn't going all out then he wouldn't never tried to turn CA into paste from getting mad at a simple statement he said. How do you explain why Thor was trying to kill the shit out of CA when CA did less harm to Thor than IM?
See, even more proof that you haven't actually watched any of the movies. If you had watched the movies you would have known that Thor was more than capable of crushing Iron Man's armor with his bare hands. So the very fact that Thor did not knock Iron Man's head off or cave his chest in is proof that Thor wasn't going all out
Originally posted by carthageMost definitely stormbreaker can damage IM. My argument is that it doesn't hit him at all. Hulk can keep Thor distracted while IM stabs him.
Stormbreaker is vastly more powerful than Tony’s own nanotech that pierced him when Thanos stabbed him. His armors durability is great but Stormbreaker will go through it, Hulk is a non factor here
Originally posted by Silent Master
Yeah, in your fanfiction where Hulk and Ironman fight at 100% or better than they ever have in the movies and Thor fights at 1%. and this is after you exaggerate the teams powers and skills while massively downplaying Thor's.
Thor is slow. IM would have to fight like a retard and lose all his reflexes and computer reflexes to get hit by that slow hammer. Thor has no defense against getting stabbed.
Originally posted by PsychotronLol it's not like Thor would be chasing I'M around trying to hit him. It would be the opposite, I'M trying to stab the shit out of Thor while avoiding a thrown axe.
Hulk tries to tank Stormbreaker and gets one-shotted. He's not the type to fight smart or dodge. Then it's only a matter of time before Tony gets tagged.