Abortion

Started by StyleTime787 pages

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Vietnam has far more adoption applications that actual foster kids available for adoption.

Why is this?

Because hollywood movie stars would rather look "humanitarian" by adopting from third world countries than in their own backyard.

Vietnam isn't the only place, China has this problem as well.

If most of the people applying for adoption would do so here in the U.S., you'd see no overflow of kids in foster care.

Your question is stupid.

Why should other people take care of the kid that grown adults had concieved through consentual sex?

It's thier responsibility.

And if not, plenty of people WILL adopt.

Being pro-life doesn't mean that you then have to adopt every child who's in foster care.

2 points for a good attempted dodge, though.


Originally posted by StyleTime
Do you personally vow to adopt these kids? Do you even realize how many children are in foster care at the moment? I doubt you do, so I'll help you out a bit.
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/afcars/trends.htm

According to a service provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, approximately 800,000 children are in foster care each year since 2000. Of the aforementioned 800,000, only around 50,000 actually are adopted each year. The majority of foster children are not adopted. Adoption is not the magical solution to unwanted fetuses you like to pretend it is.


Seriously guys, stop making me quote myself. Do you honestly believe that hollywood is going to account for the approximately 750,000 children without parents each year?

His question isn't stupid.

However your logic is questionable at best. You say that the parents are responsible for their own child, yet immediately proceed to tout adoption as a solution. You quite effectively contradicted yourself. Your skill in this craft is astounding. You are a masterful one my friend.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

So you could come up with no retort for what I stated ? I knew it.....

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
So would your anti-gay propaganda. Hitler was completely against gays, and attempted at "fixing" them via means of castration, genital torture, etc.

And what do you do today ? You post on KMC proposals as to how we can decrease the rise of Homosexuals through your absurd theories 👇

Please don't be a hypocrite...i know it's hard for you, but please try.

i agree with his decision to ignore this crap. its irrelevant to the topic and unprovoked.

ZOMG U R HITLER!!1

It's not irrelevant, I find him a hypocrite for comparing women who have abortions to Hitler, when he himself shares a similiar opinion to Hitler on another issue.

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
It's not irrelevant, I find him a hypocrite for comparing women who have abortions to Hitler, when he himself shares a similiar opinion to Hitler on another issue.

Hitler called for the death of homosexuals, has he?

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
It's not irrelevant, I find him a hypocrite for comparing women who have abortions to Hitler, when he himself shares a similiar opinion to Hitler on another issue.

he didnt directly point the hitler-spotlight at a particular member, or claim that they supported hitler's propaganda. its a far cry from not wanting gay marraige to wanting gays exterminated. granted his use of the hitler analogy was stupid, it wasnt a direct and all-assuming/damning ZOMG HITLER assault.

He compared a woman having an abortion to a genocide. He stated it would make Hitler proud.

I find that an extremely stupid and offensive comment, AND hypocritical, especially in the case where he has come up with proposals as to how to decrease the rate of Homosexuality.

Hitler gets everywhere

Godwins law!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies) is a mainstay of Internet culture, an adage formulated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law states:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.[1]

Godwin's Law does not dispute whether any particular reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be apt. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued,[2] that overuse of the Nazi/Hitler comparison should be avoided, as it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.

A.K.A. "Argumentum ad Nazium" *yawn*

Originally posted by Robtard
A.K.A. "Argumentum ad Nazium" *yawn*

Almost 👆 Well done, that was good for you! [Pats head] dur

Originally posted by Islamic_Cleric
Almost 👆 Well done, that was good for you! [Pats head] dur

Do a little research on "logical fallacies" and don't use Wiki, it might help you become a better sock-troll... because as it stands, you seriously fail at it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Do a little research on "logical fallacies" and don't use Wiki, it might help you become a better sock-troll... because as it stands, you seriously fail at it.

[pats head again] 🙂

What?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
If most of the people applying for adoption would do so here in the U.S., you'd see no overflow of kids in foster care.

And you think that ending abortion would help with this "overflow"?

You want every child conceived to be born, but so many will end up languishing in orphanages. And on top of that, I suspect that a huge number of these adoption applications in Vietnam and other "third world countries" are coming from homosexual couples, who would be happy to adopt a child from their "own back yard", if they were allowed to do so.

No, maybe.

Originally posted by Islamic_Cleric
Hitler gets everywhere

Godwins law!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies) is a mainstay of Internet culture, an adage formulated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law states:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.[1]

Godwin's Law does not dispute whether any particular reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be apt. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued,[2] that overuse of the Nazi/Hitler comparison should be avoided, as it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.

pitt_sock

Originally posted by Islamic_Cleric
Hitler gets everywhere

Godwins law!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies) is a mainstay of Internet culture, an adage formulated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law states:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.[1]

Godwin's Law does not dispute whether any particular reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be apt. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued,[2] that overuse of the Nazi/Hitler comparison should be avoided, as it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.

And this has to do with abortion because?jm 😕

its very possible that post 10,000 will occur on page 500. its a sign. close it

Here we go with the closing again!jm 🙄 😆