Abortion

Started by Rogue Jedi787 pages

Originally posted by Bardock42
Just that it is not a racist rant. Now is it?
racist? dont know you at all. elitist? a bit. very hitleresque of you.

The opinion itself. And that so many people have it. And that they want to force it on others. All that.
and as i have said too many times to count, i am not one of these people.

Well, as you have often portrayed you are unable to grasp situations. I do not hate that you excersise your freedom of speech, just that what you say, is stupid and harmful. I wouldn't want you to stop saying it, I want you to understand that it is a mean opinion and that should change it.
funny, i see you as the one unable to grasp certain situations. we think of each other this way because we see eye to eye on nothing. simple as that.

And still the question stands. If there is a vote whether abortion should be banned or not.What would you vote?
yes, i would vote to ban abortion. you know full well my views on this, so why ask?

Originally posted by Schecter
anyone that declares that aborting this

is the equivalent of murder is an idiot deserving of nothing more than spit (unless they are on fire, of course)

this is not a baby. this is not a sentient being. if you are forcing your nonsensical beliefs on others and willing to destroy lives just to feel rightous, that imho is worthy of hate.

its a POTENTIAL living breathing being. for us to rob it of a chance at life is just wrong. this is my opinion, and i AM NOT TRYING TO FORCE IT ON ANYONE.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
its a POTENTIAL living breathing being. for us to rob it of a chance at life is just wrong. this is my opinion, and i AM NOT TRYING TO FORCE IT ON ANYONE.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
yes, i would vote to ban abortion. you know full well my views on this, so why ask?

😬

Originally posted by Schecter
😬
would you rather me say to myself "well, schecter and bardock believe abortion is ok, so i better agree to it too?"

would you respect me for conforming to your beliefs? would you still call me in the morning?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
racist? dont know you at all. elitist? a bit. very hitleresque of you.

and as i have said too many times to count, i am not one of these people.

funny, i see you as the one unable to grasp certain situations. we think of each other this way because we see eye to eye on nothing. simple as that.

yes, i would vote to ban abortion. you know full well my views on this, so why ask?

Maybe. But I am not harming anyone so, whatever.

Y-yes you are. You just said so in your last sentence. Can you not remember something you said over two sentences? You are exactly one of them. And to me, you are a bad person (in that aspect). You would harm others conscious human beings for your moral ideals and just them nothing else. I don't get it.

But you are the one actually wrong. So whatever. I don't want to limit your freedom of speech. You think I want to though. And well, that just means you are the one who doesn't grasp the situation. As everyone that can read will tell you.

Because you repeatedly claim you would not force it on others. Now say you would though. Why? Hypocrite? Too stupid to think that far? Why?

Originally posted by Schecter
😬
Stop stealing my kills.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
would you rather me say to myself "well, schecter and bardock believe abortion is ok, so i better agree to it too?"

would you respect me for conforming to your beliefs? would you still call me in the morning?

No, I'd just much rather have it that you don't lie and be a hypocrite. You don't see your stupidity in saying

I am not forcing my opinion on anyone

I would vote so I could force my opinion on everyone.

?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
would you rather me say to myself "well, schecter and bardock believe abortion is ok, so i better agree to it too?"

would you respect me for conforming to your beliefs? would you still call me in the morning?

we are alike in that we are not forcing our beliefs on other people and destroying lives just to save a ball of cells. we are not against people refusing to abort [edit: their OWN] embryo because they feel it is morally wrong.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Stop stealing my kills.
Terrorists win.

You take away the choice to have an abortion by banning and making it illegal then its the same as forcing your beliefs and opinions on others. If you are comfortable with that then so be it, but call it like it is.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Maybe. But I am not harming anyone so, whatever.
still.....

Y-yes you are. You just said so in your last sentence. Can you not remember something you said over two sentences? You are exactly one of them. And to me, you are a bad person (in that aspect). You would harm others conscious human beings for your moral ideals and just them nothing else. I don't get it.
you are so far off that its pathetic. explain how i am trying to push my beliefs on others. and i am only a bad person because i am taking a different stance than you on this. to think bad of me for that is truly ridiculous.

But you are the one actually wrong. So whatever. I don't want to limit your freedom of speech. You think I want to though. And well, that just means you are the one who doesn't grasp the situation. As everyone that can read will tell you.
who the hell are you to say i am wrong? so you are right? we must all bow down and accept the mighty bardocks word as law? dood....screw that. i am not one of your bitches.

Because you repeatedly claim you would not force it on others. Now say you would though. Why? Hypocrite? Too stupid to think that far? Why?
by voting against it i am exercising my right to do so. i would not be trying to force it upon others. if you were to vote prochoice, would you be forcing your will upon others? didnt think so.

"By voting for legislation prohibiting others from abortion due to my personal beliefs, ergo attempting to force my beliefs on others, I would not be attempting to force my beliefs on others." No wonder JM agrees with you.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
still.....

you are so far off that its pathetic. explain how i am trying to push my beliefs on others. and i am only a bad person because i am taking a different stance than you on this. to think bad of me for that is truly ridiculous.

who the hell are you to say i am wrong? so you are right? we must all bow down and accept the mighty bardocks word as law? dood....screw that. i am not one of your bitches.

by voting against it i am exercising my right to do so. i would not be trying to force it upon others. if you were to vote prochoice, would you be forcing your will upon others? didnt think so.

Yeah

D-dude...you just said you would vote on it being forced on others. What the hell is wrong with you?

N-no, you just have to bow down to reality. I am not trying to limit your freedom of speech (fact). You think I am trying to limit your freedom of speech (fact). You are wrong (fact). Easy as that.

No, because it would be pro-choice, because people who would want an abortion could get one and people that don't wouldn't have to. So, if you would vote on banning abortion, and it would go through, could anyone get an abortion? No? aren't you FACTU****INGALLY forcing your views on others then?

this thread has consistantly proven that pro-lifers are hypocrites and idiots.

Originally posted by Schecter
this thread has consistantly proven that pro-lifers are hypocrites and idiots.
Terrorists win?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Terrorists win?

Pro-lifers are terrorists, so, no, hopefully not.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Pro-lifers are terrorists, so, no, hopefully not.
But counter-terrorists win doesn't have the same ring to it. 🙁

Semantically "anti-choice" as illustrated above, is a more accurate terminology to describe people who wish to overturn Roe v. Wade, since the direct opposites of both "anti-abortion" and "pro-life" aren't applicable to the diametric opposition. People who are "pro-choice," are not "anti-life" nor "pro-abortion," they are accurately described as in support of the right to choose.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
But counter-terrorists win doesn't have the same ring to it. 🙁

Semantically "anti-choice" as illustrated above, is a more accurate terminology to describe people who wish to overturn Roe v. Wade, since the direct opposites of both "anti-abortion" and "pro-life" aren't applicable to the diametric opposition. People who are "pro-choice," are not "anti-life" nor "pro-abortion," they are accurately described as in support of the right to choose.

True. Logically.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
still.....

you are so far off that its pathetic. explain how i am trying to push my beliefs on others. and i am only a bad person because i am taking a different stance than you on this. to think bad of me for that is truly ridiculous.

who the hell are you to say i am wrong? so you are right? we must all bow down and accept the mighty bardocks word as law? dood....screw that. i am not one of your bitches.

by voting against it i am exercising my right to do so. i would not be trying to force it upon others. if you were to vote prochoice, would you be forcing your will upon others? didnt think so.

Who the hell are you to say women wanting to abort are weak, same thing!!

I thought you were one of his bitches 😛

By voting against it,you would be forcing it upon others, dont you see that???

its not that he cant see the simple truth, its that he refuses to.

its easier to convolute logic and play the victim

I think the trouble is that he doesn't.

He thinks by voting against it he is just stating his opinion and not that it actually is forced on others then. He wouldnt want it, but he doesn't understand how voting works.